Report: YouTube to pay $2.5 billion per year for Sunday Ticket

YouTube
Getty Images

As explained in Playmakers, the Janet Jackson incident at Super Bowl XXXVIII — and the curiosity of those who missed it live — helped provide the spark for the creation of a video-sharing service known as YouTube. Nearly 20 years later, YouTube and the NFL will be doing a significant piece of business together.

As reported last night by multiple outlets, and as PFT has confirmed, YouTube is closing in on a deal for Sunday Ticket, the out-of-market package that DirecTV has exclusively broadcast since 1994, when it debuted. John Ourand of Sports Business Journal reports that YouTube will pay $2.5 billion per year for the package.

Talks with Google (the YouTube parent company) accelerated after Apple dropped out. Amazon was also involved; however, Ourand reports that Amazon “never got close” to the amount Google/YouTube will pay.

The Sunday Ticket package will be available on YouTube TV and YouTube Premium channels, if/when the deal is done. The price will be similar to the current DirecTV charge. That reportedly became the sticking point for Apple, which wanted to make the product less expensive for consumers.

As Alex Sherman of CNBC.com reported in June, the NFL’s deals with CBS and Fox prevent the NFL from offering Sunday Ticket at a significantly lower price. This helps maximize viewership of the games offered by CBS and Fox in a given market, by keeping people from purchasing the ability to watch all games.

Don’t get mad at CBS or Fox or YouTube about this. The NFL could have taken less from CBS and Fox in order to secure the ability to sell Sunday Ticket for less. The league, taking full advantage of its broadcast antitrust exemption, maximized the revenue from all broadcasters while also making it more expensive for average fans to watch the games they want to watch.

Basically, Apple wanted to buy the package and make it cheaper for fans. The NFL said no, no, no.

So ho, ho, ho. Merry Christmas.

111 responses to “Report: YouTube to pay $2.5 billion per year for Sunday Ticket

  1. Sounds about right. The NFL is all about unbridled greed. So now I can just pay Google $300 a month instead of DTV. BFD. I guess the dream of buying individual games was just that.

  2. Most I know subscribe to NFL Redzone (7 hours of football with no commercials) instead of Sunday ticket.

  3. Just let us, the fans, pick the games we want to pay for. I don’t need to watch Houston or Chicago unless my team is playing them. I don’t want to pay for games I WON’T be watching.

  4. Sounds like apple wanted to offer team only based subscriptions everyone was clamoring for, NFL said “naw” but what I don’t understand is, so long if the NFL is getting 2.5 billion from YouTube every year, what does the NFL care what YouTube charges for the package?

  5. Let’s not make Apple sound like good guys in all of this. A top of the line iPhone starts right at $1K.

    Hopefully the buffering/spotty quality that TNF on Amazon gives us won’t be an issue with YouTube.

  6. DirectTV has been a ball and chain I cannot get rid of for the past 24 yrs……until now. I’ll miss those 300+ channels that we never watch.

  7. Whatbthe nfl doesnt seem to understand, making the package cheaper means more people will buy it meaning more money, instead they gouge the fans, so ill just stream the games from dofu…

  8. I wonder if I’ll have to pay for the YouTube app and the subscription? I like how MLB has a package if you only want to watch your team. I pay about 100 bucks per year for my out-of-market team and it’s totally worth it. I get the home feed and everything.

  9. To break even on this – assuming it’s still about $300 to subscribe – they need over 8 million subscriptions per year. Best estimate I’m seeing is DirectTV maybe got 2 million subscriptions in a good year.

    I know there will be ad revenue and data collection to make more money, but those numbers are also heavily dependent on that subscriber number growing.

    Don’t they have anyone at Google that can do math? Or do Apple and Amazon just have better calculators?

  10. As a subscriber of YouTube TV this makes me happy. But until they offer an A la carte package, I’m still sticking with Redzone.

  11. end of the day 2.5 billion is peanuts for a company that does over a quarter trillion dollars a year in revenue. What bothers me if there are two good games on you cant just switch back and forth between the two as you could with direct tv. With streaming you have to wait for each game to load, etc….That reason alone is why it should cost less, but direct tv is dead in the water now, AT&T/Direct TV is a complete rip off compared to these other streaming services.

  12. That’s fine. Why begrudge them a profit like everybody else. We can always not buy the product.

  13. Supply and demand. Plain and simple. They charge that much because they can easily get that much. I imagine YouTube will have an introductory offer to capture new subscribers to their live TV platform, just as DirecTV did. I doubt YouTube will be as motivated as DirecTV was to discount renewals, however. To those who don’t want to pay for games they aren’t going to watch, you do that already if you have cable or satellite or streaming TV. If you get ESPN, you’re paying for every MNF game. If you get local channels, you’re paying for every national and regional game aired in your market. You just don’t realize it because it’s not a line item. But you’re totally paying for it.

  14. jtm18113 says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am

    Just let us, the fans, pick the games we want to pay for. I don’t need to watch Houston or Chicago unless my team is playing them. I don’t want to pay for games I WON’T be watching.
    ************************
    Or COURSE this is how we ALL feel. We’d love to be able to pay some reasonable amount for a “per-team” package to watch our favorite team. But of course a business (which is what the NFL is) is going to construct the best option for them to get the maximum amount of $$ possible.

    If the NFL ever goes to “per team” a-la-carte” you will find it would end up being ALMOST as much as the full package.

  15. MortimerInMiami says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am
    Most I know subscribe to NFL Redzone (7 hours of football with no commercials) instead of Sunday ticket
    /////
    So you only get your favorite team when they’re in the red zone. Doesn’t make sense to me.

  16. jtm18113 says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am
    Just let us, the fans, pick the games we want to pay for
    ////
    Great idea! Now go call your local cable company and ask to only pay a small amount to watch the 5 channels on cable that you watch.

  17. arrowhead816 says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am
    Hopefully the NFL Sunday Ticket is included with standard Youtube TV package.

    ———

    If you think that’ll happen, I’ve got some great real estate to sell you…

  18. When we did our research on which streaming service was the best for sports, YouTube TV came out on top. It’s understandable that Google would see getting Sunday Ticket as a way to increase sports fan subscribers to YouTube TV. Too bad that it sounds like YouTube TV won’t be allowed to fold Sunday Ticket into some Sports tier; the NFL will require them to slap on a big fat $300 or so price for it. Well, thanks but no thanks. I’ll stick to RedZone. After this season I won’t even bother with NFL+ because it’s too glitchy.

  19. jtm18113 says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am
    Just let us, the fans, pick the games we want to pay for. I don’t need to watch Houston or Chicago unless my team is playing them. I don’t want to pay for games I WON’T be watching.

    —————————–

    Cable in general is all about paying for things you don’t want to watch otherwise most of the channels would go away.

  20. would love it if they had an a la carte menu, and you pick only the games you want to watch. Kind of a pay per view set up.

  21. Here come the whiners about the price. We are on a site called football talk do I assume most of us like football to some degree. We’re talking 400 dollars a year or 22 a week for 18 weeks. Fakes are on from 1-7 when the 4 pm ends, that’s 6 hours of entertainment for 4 bucks an hour. This will sound crass but if you can’t afford that then wait for your team on broadcast tv and maybe go for a hike or mow the yard. 22 a week – the nfl isn’t a charity and watching games isn’t a right. I like live music too but I just don’t spend 200 dollars to go to a show by choice

  22. Let’s not pretend apple was being charitable. I’m sure they had a plan to make up the difference in revenue elsewhere. Plus, they already overcharge yuppies for a new iPhone every year.

  23. Good job NFL, you are slowly weening me off watching the games. First there was ESPN, then Prime, then NFL Network and now YouTube. Only a short time before I lose the Sunday games…oh well there’s always college games which are better.

  24. arrowhead816 says:
    December 21, 2022 at 10:01 am

    Hopefully the NFL Sunday Ticket is included with standard Youtube TV package.

    ————-

    Heh.
    Haha. HAAAAAAHAHAHA
    AHHHHHHAGTFOHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAA

    Ah. Good one, man. Thanks for the laugh.

  25. Maybe I’m just getting older but todays football is just not that interesting anymore, I will watch my hometown team but any other game I’m just 1/2 interested at best. Maybe it’s all the changes, not many kick off , punt returns, onside kicks and every penalty reviewed for 10 minutes with 20 camera angles, and don’t get me started on the new player numbers. Players doing a celebration dance after taking the runner after a 15 yard gain. Sorry for the rant

  26. They said they want to make it cheaper
    The league said no no no
    They said it’s gotta a be less steeper
    The league said no no no

  27. Still won’t be buying. Until we get to buy individual team packages, I will not support. The fact that it’s Google makes it even easier. I would’ve supported Apple, and it sounds like Apple wanted to do the right thing by fans. What a shame.

  28. Sunday Ticket is $75/mo. Yes that’s a lot, but if you go to a sports bar to watch all the games you will easily spend $30-$40 in 3-4-5 hours. Times that by 4 Sundays a month & you’re spending what, $150/month in bars to watch football. And who wants to be in a bar that many hours anyway.
    btw, YT TV will be 1000% better service than Direct TV. PPV ala carte games would be better but that ain’t happnin any time soon.

  29. This used to be the only reason I kept DTV for so many years but since my normal rate crept up year after year, once you added in Sunday Ticket it was STUPID how much I was paying them. So I finally ditched them and cobble together weekly solution for my out of market team with various streaming… um… creativity. MLB gets this right with MLB TV. It’s offered by the league, not a provider, and you can get all games or just your team’s games. I’ve long thought the NFL should follow that model, and even at much higher prices than MLB, it would still be a better way to go.

  30. I’ll still pay. I love to watch. The Directv dinosaur will be immediately jettisoned from my house. I’ll be curious to see the new pay structure and format of delivering the games.

  31. Word has it apple wanted to really spice up the coverage like they did with baseball which has been well received. They also wanted to include it with their Apple TV+ in order to boost subscribers but the deal the NFL has with the networks does not allow ST to have the price lower than it is cause everyone would watch that instead. I still don’t quite get that because I am watching fox or cbs feed through ST so I get all the same commercials anyways! Plus stealing they will finally get a true accurate viewers

  32. Wont be long before security at the games hangs people upside down to make sure they get every last dime out of their pockets before entering.

  33. Interesting to see if YouTube TV raises its prices or uses the Ticket to entice new customers. DirecTV has the best quality as far as user friendliness, unfortunately the highest prices have done them in.

  34. It seems I’ll be missing all those games on Youtube TV and not helping line the pockets of billionaires.

  35. Who cares. People will still be able to watch out of market NFL games for free via bootleg streams. If the NFL refuses to be fan friendly even in the most minimal amount, fans will have alternatives to shelling out $300 per year to watch out of market games.

  36. Too bad a good part of the country isn’t set-up (halfway decent internet services and /or capable TV) to stream sports, that lag almost and at points makes it unwatchable. See this more pushing people to cut that NFL cord.

  37. “Here come the whiners about the price. ”

    That’s true. That’s why I watch out of market games for free.

  38. Cable TV companies, Streaming service companies, auto and life insurance companies, Mobile phone companies, Internet providers…these companies have been ripping off American consumers for years charging much higher prices than seems ethical at times…yet, we all pay because “we need them.” Yay capitalism.

  39. It is called a business. Directv adjusted monthly bills and offered free subscriptions to customers at times. I imagine YouTube TV will have the same luxury. Such as sig up for YouTube Premium and get NFL Ticket for free. When people whine about a business maximizing their profits, I can tell they never have owned a business. The NFL is not a charity and it is considered an optional expenditure. If the NFL was supplying food, fuel or other necessity item I would be outraged too. I don’t see anyone holding it against Apple that they control the cost of their over priced iPhone or Sony fixing the cost of a Playstation .

  40. As long as they don’t use the feed Amazon does. Someone has to fix that. Amazon picture quality has set the viewing back a decade for twice the price

  41. That reportedly became the sticking point for Apple, which wanted to make the product less expensive for consumers.
    —————————————-
    I don’t believe this for a second. Apple has never been about wanting to make anything cheaper. This is just PR spinning it, trying to make them look better.

  42. Assuming they charge $200 for the package they need 12.5 million subscribers to break even.
    Hopefully they get a cut of the ad revenue based on the number of folks watching through their platform!

  43. It’s crazy when you realize you can find free links to every NFL game posted right on youtube every week.

  44. Anyone backing Goodell is a loser. Period. Rooting on greed to this is just absolutely disgusting.

  45. ow they can add your football watching habits to the huge dossier of data they collect on you. Awesome.

  46. Welp, guess I’ll go another 15 years without Sunday Ticket until the NFL wakes up and puts it on Amazon or ESPN/Disney. Not buying any more platforms or services. Enough is enough

  47. So folks like me, who live in areas with slow internet options, are screwed. Thanks NFL.

  48. Sooner or Later the NFL is going to make the product less viewable and less desirable for the average fan. Consumers are quirky people. Eventually when they get fed up for paying high ticket prices, high concession prices, ridiculous parking fees, NOW having to pay more and more to view the product..they will slowly erode and the NFL will be faced with “How do we get fans back?” Don’t think so? Just watch and see.

  49. Can anyone make the math make sense here? At $2.5 billion per year and $300 per subscriber, YouTube would have to have 8.33 million subscribers per year just to break even. While nobody has an exact number, most estimates have DirecTV with under 2 million subscribers per year for Sunday Ticket. What am I missing?

  50. I read the comments here and think…wait we live in a capitalist society with freedom and rights but everyone is surprised and complaining when the NFL decides to maximize profits on something they own? Thats how our country works. And as im told by conservatives all the time, if you dont support that you must not live our country. Stop whining everyone. This is how the US works

  51. I don’t get it, the Sunday ticket brings you to the FOX or CBS broadcast of the game. Does FOX and CBS not get credit for those viewers that are viewing through Sunday Ticket? $300 is not that bad, its annoying to have to pay the $65 on top of that for the YouTubeTV subscription, which I of course will pay, instantly, for the rest of my life.

  52. YouTube was more than willing to pay $4.2B, but the NFL held firm and insisted they also televise some Vikings games.

  53. Really? They wanted to make it cheaper for fans? Because they are just so generous? Apple knows how to brainwash people to continually buy their products. I have zero doubt this was a power move to somehow make it easier for Apple buyers to use and shift more people out of Android and Windows. Apple NEVER leaves money on the table.

  54. You can get all the games for $20 a month, $80 per season from September through December, if you already have a VPN. If not, $10 more per month for a good VPN. Go to Amazon Canada at Amazon.ca and buy a DAZN gift card for $25 Canadian dollars and email it to yourself. Pick a Canadian network on your VPN and go sign up to DAZN.CA. Pay for your one month subscription with the gift card code (if you pay with your credit card it will detect that you’re in the USA). And there you go. All the games and Red Zone for $20 usd a month.

  55. So, the NFL gouges you while paying officials part time, and not paying for appropriate cameras in the end zones to ensure no blown scoring calls. Add that to the inferior football teams are playing now due to all the stupid rule changes, and we’re now supposed to be excited to sign up and pay a small ransom for the privilege of not only watching this drivel, but being preached to about what our positions should be on politics and social issues? I’m supposed to watch while the NFL caters to various groups based on criteria I not only disagree with, but I want to prevent them from exposing my family to? I’ve been perilously close to cutting the tie here already. It’s just not what it used to be and there are so many other options now. There is a a tribal bond with teams and fans. It’s not easy to break. It’s only in recent years I even thought of this, and in the last 3 years it’s been progressively worse. The product isn’t worth it anymore especially packaged the way it is. Going into this future economy, this will be a luxury many cannot afford, and frankly, there are better places to put your money.

  56. Sorry people.ala Carter isn’t happening. Nfl has in the contract with fox and CBS they can’t give it on the cheap.google it.yeh it sucks.id love to only watch my team for,say 100 bucks.

  57. The NFL is a business, I don’t blame them one bit for taking the higher $$$$. Anyone who has ever owned a business knows you take it while you can get it.

  58. “Basically, Apple wanted to buy the package and make it cheaper for fans. The NFL said no, no, no.”

    So …. Apple is the good guys there.

    I need to stop at the Apple Store today. The new computer I ordered is ready for pick-up.

  59. Sooooo glad I cut the cable years ago. Now I can just pay all these other companies for each individual service that adds up to double the price plus taxes on each service. So convenient and wicked smart.

  60. I’m worried they’re gonna mess this up. With DirecTV we’re able to watch all the games at once. I’m note sure how or if that is going to work on a streaming platform.

  61. Coming soon to a streaming service…contracts for the whole year. Gotta get ya to stay around as long as possible. Part of the regular service of YouTube?!??! Yall foolish to assume this.

  62. Late stage capitalism means never having to say your sorry for being greedy. We are getting close to big change because the greed has gotten so absurd.

  63. You know, if people don’t pay exorbitant fees for 16 games a week (most of which they won’t watch), the price will come down. They might teach that on the very first day of your high school economics elective.

  64. Sure. Sure Apple was motivated by charity towards fans. And oh by the way you probably would have had to pay to subscribe to an Apple service to get that discount on Sunday Ticket.

  65. The reason Roger Goodell still has his job is because he keeps making the owners richer with unreasonable deals like this.

  66. So, what will happen to the DirecTV Redzone with Andrew Siciliano? The NFL Redzone is only on tablets and phones.

  67. At $350 a year. That 7.5 million subscribers to break even. Must be a loss leader. No way close to that many people will pay for Sunday ticket.

  68. For those of you who don’t know (and many here do not seem to) there is a federal law that REQUIRES your local cable network to carry the ‘over the air’ local TV stations and also prevents the networks from offering you a subscription for their ‘out of market’ local stations. Thus thru cable you can not buy, by law, let’s say NYC ABC if you live in LA. That same law, in theory, applies streaming\satellite\whatever.

    Also the NFL has a vested interest in making sure your local team gets coverage in market (how many times do the commentators say at LA games [either team] that the local fans seemed out numbered by the visitors?).

    Also ALL TV\streaming\cable\satellite goes into a big pot and is shared equally among all teams. If the NFL allowed team only packages you can be sure that JJ would not want to share the revenue generated by Cowboys’ sales with say the Lions.

    So you can forget about ala-carte packages.

    All that said this is a capitalist society. The NFL has a right to generate as much revenue as it can and you have a right to not pay to watch their product.

    Get over you aren’t getting what you want …. the universe doesn’t work that way.

  69. So, the NFL gouges you while paying officials part time, and not paying for appropriate cameras in the end zones to ensure no blown scoring calls. Add that to the inferior football teams are playing now due to all the stupid rule changes, and we’re now supposed to be excited to sign up and pay a small ransom for the privilege of not only watching this drivel, but being preached to about what our positions should be on politics and social issues? I’m supposed to watch while the NFL caters to various groups based on criteria I not only disagree with, but I want to prevent them from exposing my family to? I’ve been perilously close to cutting the tie here already. It’s just not what it used to be and there are so many other options now. There is a a tribal bond with teams and fans. It’s not easy to break. It’s only in recent years I even thought of this, and in the last 3 years it’s been progressively worse. The product isn’t worth it anymore especially packaged the way it is. Going into this future economy, this will be a luxury many cannot afford, and frankly, there are better places to put your money.
    ——————————————–
    Every single line here is truth.
    All this is why I haven’t spent $1 on anything NFL related in 20+ years.
    And never will again.

  70. All of you here worrying about the youtube subscription are 3 years behind life. There are dozens of LEGAL apps you can download that consolidate all of the nation’s local broadcasting channels into one location. If you live in Arizona and want to watch the Giants, you open the app and click the NY Fox station and there are the Giants. The subscription for these Apps is between $10-$20 per month. Get with the times!

  71. Apple’s main sticking point was wanting to make it less expensive for consumers? Something seems amiss here. That’s not the Apple way.

  72. VPNs do not work. There are no “legal apps” that consolidate all local broadcasts and give them to you with any quality. If any of this were true that is what everyone would do and no one would pay for Sunday Ticket.

  73. If you know anything about marketing, you know the commercials alone will pay for that sum of money. No brained for YouTube.

  74. The “I should get everything I want for free/cheap” crowd will hate this but welcome to the real world. This is business, straight out of the text book. Why do you think that down in the fine print of coupons and promotions they always exclude the brands you really want like Bose, Weber, Yeti, North Face, Nike, etc. This isn’t some conspiracy stemming from a special anti-trust exemption. Companies have the right to set their own prices as well as put a floor on the price their customers re-sell their products at (hint, you aren’t the NFL’s customer, you’re the end user) in order to protect their brand and protect their customers who meet their service standards.

  75. I will buy a standalone Sunday Ticket package from Youtube. If I have to pay $65 per month for YoutubeTV before I even have the opportunity to buy ST then I’ll be a no.

  76. They make the big money from bars and restaurants who have to pay $300 x capacity of their establishment. It’s a huge expense for them.

  77. YouTube TV is much better than Amazon, however from a picture quality standpoint Apple is supreme.

  78. If you’re not watching games for free on one of the many Russian streaming sites, you’re doing it wrong.

  79. All the games still come on cbs and fox on Sunday ticket. I’m not understanding the importance of watching/ protecting the the local market.

  80. Amazing how a fake journalist who can’t post any truths here passes off his book as packed with facts? And he has no shame self-promoting on a website he does not own.

  81. Look I’m old school …I’ll watch free games on SunDAYS and Monday night till they get bought up too. At that point I’ll be done with the NFL. It’s that simple. I would never begrudge a company to grow their brand regardless of their strategy.

  82. Everyone that has posted it would require around 8m subscribers to break-even yearly isn’t accounting for the actual cost of Youtube TV in there. There will be subscribers to YTTV already that sign-up but there is a dedicated group that hasn’t had YTTV that will now be paying $65+ monthly packages (obviously not all revenue to Google) plus the cost of ST. Not to mention the ad revenue and general word of mouth that will lead to additional subscribers of YTTV even without ST.

    I am certainly not a paying subscriber to Sunday Ticket, only gotten it with deals and offers in the past through my mom having DTV already but if you don’t care about paying $300 for additional games, there are a lot of ways to watch now. The only people this really screws is if you absolutely cannot get good enough internet where you live, which is ironic that your option is probably to replace DTV with Satellite internet and stream if it really came down to that haha.

  83. I’ll suck it up and get YouTube for three months a year. If it’s $200 to watch the games I want, I can live with that, but not going to pay Google for a year.

  84. Right now I VPN to Amsterdam and get Gamepass with all the games for $225 a year. But I think this deal means I’m done. They just dig around in your pockets and it’s killing off the fan base. I think I’m done.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.