Matt LaFleur doesn’t rule out bringing back Nathaniel Hackett, or giving up playcalling

Green Bay Packers v Chicago Bears
Getty Images

Former Broncos coach Nathaniel Hackett earned his chance to become the former coach of the Broncos based on his work as the offensive coordinator of the Packers.

Now that Hackett is available, could he return to the Packers?

“I think I’ve definitely entertained all that,” coach Matt LaFleur said Monday, via Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com, regarding the possibility of Hackett returning. “I think you can never have enough great coaches, and certainly you guys know how I feel about Nathaniel and the job he did here. But again, just getting started into the evaluation phase. I did talk to him after he got let go in Denver. I know that he needs some family time as well.”

Hackett, who was the offensive coordinator in Green Bay from 2019 through 2021, has a multi-year buyout, which surely includes standard offset language. Thus, if he coaches elsewhere, he’d essentially be working for free.

Still, coaches coach. And Hackett may crave a better experience in 2023, to erase the bad situation he had in 2022.

The failure of his Broncos doesn’t mean he doesn’t know what he’s doing. It just means he did one job so well that he got promoted into a position with which he clearly struggled.

One of the problems for Hackett in Denver was that, after not calling plays in Green Bay, Hackett was both running the team and selecting the offensive plays. If he goes back to Green Bay, he or some other assistant would potentially call the plays — because LaFleur hasn’t ruled out the possibility of delegating those duties in the name of paying more attention to the rest of the team.

“As far as the playcalling’s concerned, yeah that’s crossed my mind in terms of I want to do whatever’s best for us to have success,” LaFleur told reporters. “If we feel like that is the best way for us to win games, then I would 100 percent hand that over.”

Playcalling has become a thing for the Packers because quarterback Aaron Rodgers complained a little bit about LaFleur’s decisions late in Sunday night’s loss to the Lions.

“Those last three calls definitely sting a little bit,” Rodgers said on Sunday. “But [we’ve] still got to execute.”

Asked about the comment from Rodgers on Monday, LaFleur was very linear and literal: “I would say yeah, if that’s what he said, then he probably didn’t like the playcall.”

At some point, it’s hard not to wonder whether LaFleur’s effort to take better control of the team will include taking better control of his passive-aggressor passer of the football — especially since at times Rodgers seems more interested in settling scores and/or making points over doing whatever needs to be done to become the best possible player and teammate he can be.

22 responses to “Matt LaFleur doesn’t rule out bringing back Nathaniel Hackett, or giving up playcalling

  1. Hard to believe LaFleur would let Hackett call plays after A) Not letting him do so in his prior stint and B) Watching the disaster that was the Denver offense when Hackett was calling their plays. Hackett’s main “skill” seems to be that he’s likable. From a football standpoint he doesn’t seem to bring anything at all.

  2. It would be really nice if just once a coach or teammate could give it back to #12. “Yeah, I definitely shouldn’t have dialed up that porrly-thrown interception on the last play.”
    Just once.

  3. LaFleur has his work cut out for him this offseason.

    Not sure Hackett is the answer. But he should definitely find a senior Shanahan/McVay member to review all the things that went wrong in 2022.

  4. Previous posts are spot on. Rodgers and Hackett became fast friends.
    Aaron thinks the world of Nathaniel. Hackett put La Fleurs game planning and play call sheets together for him. It didn’t work out for Hackett in Denver,.. but that wasn’t all his fault. When the star QB comes in and throws picks and fumbles,… that’s a problem.

  5. When the star QB comes in and throws picks and fumbles… that’s a problem.
    ==========

    Rodgers thumb sure looked like an issue throughout the season.

    The two deep balls to Watson would have been sure touchdowns the previous two seasons.

    We’ve rarely seen him miss those throws.

  6. He had the same look of resignation on his face I once saw on Brett Favre. If you measured his postseason performances following each of his recent MVP regular seasons, you’d have to call them an anomaly. He’s trying too hard and accomplishing too little, just like Favre. That’s the way it has been for twelve years. Please take your talent and go be the next John Hadl somewhere else.

  7. Packers offence struggled early because of the loss of Adams, and largely because Rodgers didn’t put in enough time with his young new receivers. It’s not surprising that they looked better at the end of the season than they did at the start.
    Hackett managing the diva at QB is wishful thinking.

  8. Packers offence struggled early because of the loss of Adams, and largely because Rodgers didn’t put in enough time with his young new receivers.
    ===========

    Rookie WRs rarely make a big impact. Relying on them was a huge mistake.

    The fact that Lazard, Watkins and Cobb didn’t step up was a much bigger deal.

  9. Rookie WRs rarely make a big impact. Relying on them was a huge mistake.
    ++++++
    Nope. It was time for Green Bay to prepare for the future. Lazard was okay. Bringing in old vets was dumb.

    Even BEFORE Rodgers hurt his thumb Green Bay should have been relying on defense, time of possession, and field position to win games. Rodgers/LaFleur never properly embraced that.

    AFTER it should have been mantra. Instead Packers going for 4 and 1 on their own 36 in the first freaking quarter. Stupid.

    Even if Aaron plays ball, Green Bay will need to a year to deal with the cash they pushed back in recent years. Make it 2023! (when the Lions win 13 games).

  10. I’d worry more about bringing in a coach on the defensive side that actually teaches some on-field discipline.

  11. purpleguy says:

    I’d worry more about bringing in a coach on the defensive side that actually teaches some on-field discipline.
    +++++
    I’d worry more about a team that’s been in the bottom 20% of the League in defense for three years running. I know you guys don’t want to start that until you’re eliminated, though.

  12. stellarperformance says:
    January 10, 2023 at 1:17 pm
    He had the same look of resignation on his face I once saw on Brett Favre. If you measured his postseason performances following each of his recent MVP regular seasons, you’d have to call them an anomaly. He’s trying too hard and accomplishing too little, just like Favre. That’s the way it has been for twelve years. Please take your talent and go be the next John Hadl somewhere else.

    ________

    An anomaly is right and that’s because the MVP award is a popularity contest.

  13. packerlies says:
    January 10, 2023 at 3:53 pm
    Rookie WRs rarely make a big impact. Relying on them was a huge mistake.
    ++++++
    Nope. It was time for Green Bay to prepare for the future. Lazard was okay. Bringing in old vets was dumb.

    ////////////

    Maybe they should bring in that Ron Hutson you talk about. The one that can get you 475 yards a season.🤣

  14. Maybe they should bring in that Ron Hutson you talk about.
    ++++++
    You couldn’t even get that right.

  15. From a Packer fan, he has no control over this team, he’s a cheerleader, rodgers is going to do Rodgers, his choice in his defensive coordinator was terrible and it showed all season, players go rouge whenever they want, clean hose, send rodgers away, far away, hire a real coach that’s not afraid to stand up to players. The team is a mess from top to bottom.

  16. packerlies says:
    January 10, 2023 at 6:51 pm
    Maybe they should bring in that Ron Hutson you talk about.
    ++++++
    You couldn’t even get that right

    ////////////////

    Outside gb no one knows his name. 🤣

  17. Outside gb no one knows his name. 🤣
    ==========

    Ignorance isn’t an excuse.

    Hutson still holds about a dozen records. And after nearly 80 years, they’ll probably never be broken.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.