Matt Rhule, Panthers battle over buyout

New Orleans Saints v Carolina Panthers
Getty Images

The Panthers got a gift when former head coach Matt Rhule landed at Nebraska, since his earnings in his new job will reduce the amount of money that multi-billionaire David Tepper would otherwise owe to the man he fired after five games into his third season.

But the Panthers apparently think that Rhule and the Cornhuskers have engaged in contractual shenanigans, with the goal of forcing Tepper to pay more.

Via Jonathan Jones of CBS Sports, Rhule has filed an arbitration claim over the team’s refusal to pay his buyout.

The Panthers reportedly have refused to pay Rhule because they believe the Nebraska contract was structured to maximize his buyout. In Carolina, Rhule was making roughly $8.5 million per year. In Nebraska, the eight-year deal has a base value of $74 million — and average of $9.25 million.

Rhule’s Nebraska contract, however, pays $5.5 million in the first year and escalates to $12.5 million.

The Panthers reportedly will rely on the following language from the anti-tampering policy regarding the reasonableness of subsequent NFL contracts given to a fired coach: “If the contract with the new club includes a substantial salary increase in new contract years, the Commissioner shall use the following as a guideline to determine the reasonableness of those increases: (i) if annual compensations is scheduled to increase by 20 percent or more for the new contract years, the prior club’s annual offset, if that club is entitled to an offset, shall be calculated based upon the employee’s average annual compensation during the entire term of contract.”

The first challenge for the Panthers will be to get the league to apply that language to a coach who takes a college job. Given that the issue will be resolved under the auspices of the NFL, that argument has a far better chance of succeeding in the Court of Roger Goodell than it would in a court of law.

According to the report, roughly $5 million is at issue. If the rule quoted above is applied to Rhule, he’ll get nothing. If it isn’t, he’ll get the difference between what he would have made in Carolina and what he’ll actually make in Nebraska, until the moment at which the Nebraska pay exceeds the Carolina pay.

Bottom line? Tepper and the Panthers believe that moment should be regarded as right now.

While I generally feel no compulsion to help a guy worth $17 billion to save some couch-cushion cash, it’s a persuasive argument. No coach should be allowed to structure a contract in a way to maximize his buyout.

Rhule will make more per year on average with Nebraska than he was making per year at Carolina. That should extinguish any obligation Tepper would have to Rhule.

30 responses to “Matt Rhule, Panthers battle over buyout

  1. I’m sure that the term “Club” is defined somewhere in this agreement. And I’d bet a fair amount that the definition doesn’t refer to the University of Nebraska.

  2. David Tepper is rapidly becoming one of the most despised NFL owners.
    Unless he backs away and allows the people he hires to do the job they were hired for,.. Carolina will be the next dumpster fire team.
    Buying and Selling stock options and derivatives doesn’t immediately qualify you to run an NFL team like an expert.

  3. Yeah, I’m not gonna feel sorry for Rhule for trying to squeeze a few extra millions that he’s not owed. There is an argument to be made that Tepper deserves it for hiring him in the first place, but it’s a clown show when someone is suing for doing a terrible job when they’re making almost a million MORE at their new job.

  4. 1967forever says:
    February 1, 2023 at 11:15 am
    I’m sure that the term “Club” is defined somewhere in this agreement. And I’d bet a fair amount that the definition doesn’t refer to the University of Nebraska.
    ________________

    Exactly

  5. right or wrong, it’s a super bad look for a coach who is going to make $74 million dollars to use accounting tricks to squeeze a few more million from a job where he failed miserably.

  6. Rhule spent most of his college coaching career deftly inserting commentary about what a “pro style offense” he ran so that he could get to the pros. He left broken promises to recruits everywhere he went. Now he wants the Panthers to keep a promise the buy-out clause doesn’t even say they made?

    Please…be happy you have work, Matt.

  7. In most any buyout scenario like this, the issue isn’t necessarily where the former employee goes or who they work for, its how much compensation they receive. It’s pretty clear Rhule structured his contract to screw over the Panthers — his average comp will exceed what he was to get with Carolina. And this is coming from a guy that strongly dislikes the Panther’s owner.

  8. Next question, how did Tepper structure Frank Reich’s contract? Did he pay him at or above what colts were paying him or did he play games with that offset?

  9. This issue would have to be settle in civil court, period. The NFL rules do not apply once he is terminated but a contract is binding and for whatever reason they structured his Nebraska contract has nothing to do with the NFL. The Panthers are going to have to pay him of they like it or not.

  10. purpleguy says:
    February 1, 2023 at 11:43 am
    And this is coming from a guy that strongly dislikes the Panther’s owner.
    ______________

    Why do you strongly dislike Tepper? You’ve never met the man. You have no basis to like or dislike him.

  11. Nebraska will and should tell the “league” to pound sand. If they have to offer a defense, they can cite cash flow issues resulting from the dump truck loads of coin they paid to get rid of Frost (when they could have waited 2 weeks or so to mitigate that ‘crisis’).

  12. therealtrenches says:
    February 1, 2023 at 11:43 am
    Rhule spent most of his college coaching career deftly inserting commentary about what a “pro style offense” he ran so that he could get to the pros. He left broken promises to recruits everywhere he went. Now he wants the Panthers to keep a promise the buy-out clause doesn’t even say they made?

    Please…be happy you have work, Matt.
    ______________

    I seriously doubt that you followed Rhule’s every comment that closely. Every college coach breaks promises to recruits.

  13. Maybe Tepper is angry Rhule is being smarter than him. Contracts are rock solid. It was Tepper who ended it,.. not Rhule. If Rhule had taken another NFL HC job,… I’d have a different perspective,.. but he didn’t.
    He took an NCAA job.

  14. The Huskers are probably going to eat the last 5 years of that new 8 year contract they gave Rhule.

  15. Bottom line the Panthers agreed to the contract. Don’t think they can control the terms of the Nebraska contract. For context Nebraska owes Scott Frost $5M for the next 2 years after firing him. Would make sense that they are paying Rhule less not as an attempt to deceive the Panthers but to balance their own budget. Predicting a rare Rhule victory here,lol.

  16. Seems to me that if you sign a coach to a contract and then fire him, you ought to be bound by that contract for its entirety, whether the coach gets another job or not. If there are extenuating circumstances, such as a criminal conviction, then the contract could be voided, but I don’t think ineptitude should count as an extenuating circumstance. And that is definitely the case here.

  17. Sorry, but Tepper is right here. The one time the owner is right, people here are like that’s wrong. When they do obviously wrong stuff like their hiring practices or screw over players, most of you are on their side. Weird. Oh, and Rhule is going to fail spectacularly at Nebraska. Guy has two winning seasons in his life but for some reason has this great reputation. It’s funny.

  18. gibson45 says:
    February 1, 2023 at 12:01 pm
    therealtrenches says:
    February 1, 2023 at 11:43 am
    Rhule spent most of his college coaching career deftly inserting commentary about what a “pro style offense” he ran so that he could get to the pros. He left broken promises to recruits everywhere he went. Now he wants the Panthers to keep a promise the buy-out clause doesn’t even say they made?

    Please…be happy you have work, Matt.
    ______________

    I seriously doubt that you followed Rhule’s every comment that closely. Every college coach breaks promises to recruits.

    —–

    And in that, you’d be wrong. I’m admittedly a Temple alum with an axe to grind, but his broadcast of his pro style offense while coaching at the college level is well documented.

    And yes, lots of college coaches break promises to recruits. But that doesn’t make it okay. And few do what Rhule did at Temple, which was sign a fresh new contract, go on the air to say he wanted to stay and build the program, and then bail for Baylor days later without ever facing his Temple players.

  19. What is the difference in this, and the “contractual shenanigans” the Browns and Watson pulled, with the 1st year of HIS contract? I’m thinking none at all. That said, I am happy that there is better than a 50/50 chance the Browns are ALREADY regretting it!

  20. The Smartest Guy In The Room (Tepper) strikes again. Another shining example of how, relative to football, he excels at winning the battle and losing the war…

    I have no doubt that contractually, The Smartest Guy In The Room would prevail in court. However, making horrible football decisions seems to be Tepper’s sole claim to football fame (in addition to trying to hose his neighbors in South Carolina by backing away from a deal to develop a training facility and attempting to stick them with the tab)…

  21. It does feel like the simple math says take the AAV of the contract and just say that’s what he’s making per year. I’d argue though that maybe college salaries shouldn’t even offset NFL salaries. If these idiot owners can’t help themselves when luring coaches from the college ranks, it serves them right when those coaches fail and need to go crawling back to college.

  22. When Lil Napoleon Snyder sells his team, the Commodes, the Carolina Paper Tigers will assume the place of garbage management.

  23. IF you havent followed Teppper’s business dealings, read the news and maybe that will give you some insight on the type of guy Tepper is. The purpose for Arbitration is to protect coaches from Billionaire owner’s lawyers. Its not about the money, its about precedent and responsibly holding all owners accountable.

  24. Funny how NFL teams cut players despite their contracts all the time, but now when they might owe money to a coach they fired they want to whine about what’s fair?

  25. Sounds to me like Rhule has outsmarted the owner. I have a gut feeling there is more to this than any of us know. I could care less what Rhule does but we all knew he would land on his feet with another college team once he was fired. Funny how Rhule will make more money with a college team than with a pro team. The college’s and the owners of the NFL teams are making a killing off the players. I am glad to finally see the young players in college get paid and I never get mad at any player for holding out to get their money.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.