NFL Network pulls Michael Irvin after misconduct complaint

Super Bowl LVII Opening Night presented by Fast Twitch
Getty Images

Hall of Famer Michael Irvin has made a quick exit from NFL Network’s coverage of Super Bowl LVII, following an allegation of misconduct recently made against him.

Via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News, a woman complained about Irvin’s behavior during an encounter that occurred on Sunday evening in Arizona.

“Michael Irvin will not be a part of NFL Network’s Super Bowl LVII week coverage,” NFL Media spokesperson Alex Riethmiller said in a statement to Gehlken.

Irvin disputed the allegations in comments to Gehlken.

“Honestly, I’m a bit baffled with it all,” Irvin told Gehlken. “This all happened in a 45-second conversation in the lobby. When I got back after going out . . . I came into the lobby, and I talked to somebody. I talked to this girl. I don’t know her, and I talked to her for about 45 seconds.

“We shook hands. Then, I left. . . . That’s all I know.”

Irvin added that he was “out drinking,” which will make it hard for him to dispute her version, if the drinking potentially has impaired his memory of the interaction.

“It was just a friendly conversation,” Irvin said. “‘What’s up?’ I don’t even know. . . . I am totally perplexed.”

He insisted that there was nothing sexual.

“What law did I break?” Irvin said. “There was definitely nothing physical. . . . That’s honestly all that happened. Nobody was in my room. It was a 45-second conversation in the lobby, a handshake and we left. . . . I don’t know. I don’t know what this is, and it’s running me crazy.”

Irvin also is scheduled to appear on Friday’s First Take on ESPN. An ESPN spokesperson declined to comment on Irvin’s status, in response to an inquiry from Gehlken.

128 responses to “NFL Network pulls Michael Irvin after misconduct complaint

  1. We have to remember that the younger generations feel words can be a ‘physical assault’. He probably made a suggestion that she didn’t receive too well.

  2. RE: alarmbottle says:
    February 8, 2023 at 12:56 pm

    Of course he’s going to say he didn’t do anything.

    ——–

    Do you have any facts about what he did?
    Or do we take your Opinion as Fact?

  3. Not an Irvin fan at all but this sounds rather fishy. Guess what really went down will come out eventually but sounds like a whole lotta nothing to me.

  4. The whole issue is a non-issue to me. I can probably watch NFL Network this week, But… It sounds like he’ll be back, though. M. Irvin = Tuck.

  5. Old habits obviously are still hard to break. Hopefully that’s the last we see of Michael Irvin on network TV.

  6. hotel lobbies have cameras. No audio, but should be able to see some body language to give any indication of what really happened…?

  7. I’m sure there are security cameras, and I feel like this has happened to Mike a few times.

  8. (Please use this one–without the typo!) The whole issue is a non-issue to me. I can probably watch NFL Network this week, But… It sounds like he’ll be back, though. M. Irvin = Yuck.

  9. Well the hotel will have video of lobby cams and showing his door of who was coming and going.

  10. The NFL … brought to you by Bud Light. Can’t really blame Michael Irvin for being a product of the product.

  11. I’m shocked. Shocked, I say..

    Michael Irvin hasn’t been able to get out of his own way since The U. Multiple sexual assault allegations, drug arrests and he stabbed a teammate with a pair of scissors in a barber’s chair. He was a terrific player but a poor teammate and human being.

  12. Michael Irvin has always had a big mouth. Always arrogant. This doesn’t surprise me one bit.

  13. If that’s it proof should be easy enough I’d think.
    The NFL Network has hired a handful of questionable characters in the past though…

  14. There should be video of the hotel lobby which viewer can get an idea of the interaction. The internet will release it eventually.

  15. It’s not the first allegation against Irvin in his career, so that doesn’t help him in the eyes of the public, but this is kind of a non-story until it’s investigated. Hopefully, there were witnesses or there is camera footage that will either corroborate the allegations or clear Irvin.

  16. The best defense is to just shut up and not say anything, but Michael has started digging his hole.

  17. Lets first see the video tape of the encounter before we all rush to judgement. Celebrities are always at risk of an alleged accusation no matter what.

  18. Mrs. Irvin isn’t gonna be happy about this. Mike has some ‘splaining to do when he gets home.

  19. My only question is what took him so long? He exhibited this type of behavior at the so called White House in the 90’s.

  20. If he gets fired from the network after the Superbowl, then it had to be more than a handshake. I can’t think of a network that has drop kicked someone with similar allegations that wasn’t eventually found to be a fault for what they did.

    Other than that, Irvin is painful to listen to so glad he’s out.

  21. Let’s go to the video tape. It may tell the real story in body language. It’s Michael Irvin, so anything is possible. I’ll reserve judgement until then…

  22. Why is there an automatic assumption that Irvin has actually done something wrong? I’m definitely NOT a fan of his as a football talking head, but this is patently ridiculous. The NFL Network has also assumed that, just because someone he claims to have spent 45 seconds with and then made an accusation, that her accusation is true and accurate. Could she be an attention-seeker? Someone who might later try to sue Irvin for harassment? I’m as liberal as it gets, but this whole “woke” thing is going too far. How many more people in the public eye will have to be accused and later exonerated before everyone begins to think that maybe, just MAYBE some of these accusations have ZERO basis in actual FACT? The NFL Network, and by extension, the league itself, has already ASSUMED that Irvin is guilty of some transgression when there’s NO supporting evidence of any kind. And please, let’s not forget how inept the NFL has been in punishing those players who were proven to have actually punched, kicked or otherwise assaulted their wives or partners.

  23. This is the same guy that previously stabbed his co-worker in the neck with a scissors, missing the carotid artery by inches. Yeah, I will just say that I’m extremely surprised the NFL Network hired him to begin with and I have always doubted their judgement of character.

  24. Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, that Irvin is telling the truth.

    Then try to imagine Michael Irvin — normally gregarious (and now tipsy) — approaching you at the party hotel during SB week, leaning in for a handshake, looking you in the face with a big smile, and saying “whaaaat’s uuuuuupppp?”

    Not saying she should’ve filed anything, but…Even though he did nothing wrong, you’d be at least a little creeped out, right? I know I would.

  25. A. The stripes on a leopard do NOT change
    B. We will already hear and see 117 “analysts” every hour all week talking about the big game. He won’t be missed…and the overall broadcast will be QUIETER without him.

  26. Please tell us exactly what is considered bad behavior. And if you’re off duty why is should the company care. ( Yeah I know some little clause in a NFL contract). Mountain out of a mole hill, she said he said ….

  27. I do not know why he is an announcer, he is loud, annoying, interrupts and does not make sense

  28. “Irvin added that he was “out drinking,” which will make it hard for him to dispute her version, if the drinking potentially has impaired his memory of the interaction.”

    That’s an interesting statement. Does that standard apply to accusers of misconduct as well?

  29. Irvin is in his 50’s and he’s been living in a bubble all his life due to wealth and influence. He probably has no idea that at some point during the Obama administration, we switched to running the country based on feelings, while simultaneously excluding any requirement that those feelings be accompanied by some semblance of mental health. This is just a fact, and it doesn’t matter how we feel about it (oh the irony). So it’s normal for him to not be aware of how these conversations can become catastrophic (for him), in a world where the accusation is the proof. The lesson is that he cannot simply have informal conversations with people he does not know, especially if the person is potentially a member of an aggrieved social group who may be sensitive to his verbosity and overbearing personality, without risking having a clash of cultures based on being raised in different era’s, and not having been in a position to learn about these things, which may or may not be related to his position of wealth and influence. My guess is he will be offered the opportunity to attend Re-Education Camp followed by an opportunity to make public statements of apology and show off his new found understanding of a world run by feelings. I could have had the same conversation with her and nobody would ever hear about it. Irvin is a public figure with deep pockets, so it is natural that he is being attacked, as these kinds of public attacks can not only net financial gain, but at the very least, there is the social boost they get from posting online and rallying support to get someone fired, which helps them balance the negative feels with the ego boost that comes from making yourself a victim on Tik Tok.

    Or, he did something he shouldn’t have done. There are cameras everywhere. More will be revealed.

  30. Irvin: Unsubstantiated complaint regarding a 1-minute verbal encounter – you’re cut from the biggest gig of the year.

    Watson: Dozens of allegations of sexual abuse – here’s a quarter-billion dollars, please be the face of an NFL franchise.

    Morality, NFL style.

  31. realfootballfan says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:16 pm
    First Sapp, now this. Every time they come to Arizona.
    ______________

    Not a safe place to be an African-American.

  32. Utterly disgusting if Irvin was removed based on just an allegation made. If video exists that shows a short interaction that ended in a hand shake, (This should be easy enough to verify) then this is utter garbage and any claim of an inappropriate interaction should not be given merit. How many inappropriate short conversations between a Woman and a Man that end in a hand shake has anyone been involved in or witnessed? Men everywhere are in a lot of trouble if this is the remedy to unproven allegations and they better start adjusting any and all interactions with the public. How long before we see a player removed before a big game based on a allegation that cant be verified before a game starts.

  33. Meanwhile Alvin Kamara still hasn’t been disciplined…

    With plenty of video evidence

  34. gmjoe says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:56 pm
    Please tell us exactly what is considered bad behavior. And if you’re off duty why is should the company care. ( Yeah I know some little clause in a NFL contract). Mountain out of a mole hill, she said he said ….
    ______________

    Off duty conduct still reflects upon and effects the company’s reputation. If you need someone to explain the difference between good or bad behavior you weren’t raised very well.

  35. GoodellMustGo says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:36 pm
    Innocent until proven guilty folks.
    ________________

    That concept is only applicable only in a court of law.

  36. NFL Network has employed a number of questionable characters over the years. Guys no other network wanted to hire. This should mot be a surprise.

  37. Nice hotel. Classy clientele. Approach a stranger in the lobby and invite her up to your room? What could go wrong?

  38. I am shocked the guy that actually sliced a teammates neck was on good behavior this long.

  39. True or not, good riddance as it saves me from changing channels every time he appears and opens his yip!

    NFL can do much better.

  40. This is a bit like that Cardinals coach who got instantly fired while in Mexico. The wheels normally turn fairly slowly on these sorts of things as an investigation takes place. When things move really fast it makes you wonder what exactly is going on. Is their embarrassing video they don’t want to leak? Was this person connected to somebody important?

  41. Unless Irving is completely exonerated, the NFLN will take a huge PR hit if they don’t fire him, particularly in light of his past reoccurring history.

  42. mogogo1 says:
    February 8, 2023 at 2:31 pm
    This is a bit like that Cardinals coach who got instantly fired while in Mexico.
    ______________

    Irvin hasn’t been fired, just removed from the Super Bowl coverage.

  43. jdunnfla says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:56 pm
    A. The stripes on a leopard do NOT change
    B. We will already hear and see 117 “analysts” every hour all week talking about the big game. He won’t be missed…and the overall broadcast will be QUIETER without him.

    212Rate This

    —————–

    Leopards don’t have stripes.

  44. Probably like drunk Joe Namath hitting on Suzy Kolber on air a few years ago, trying to get her to kiss him while she gamely tried to avoid his advances and try to get him to answer a question, any question. That’s the kind of drunk I imagine Irvin to be – obnoxious and having no recollection of what he did the next day.

  45. Innocent until proven guilty, but it’s interesting that this sort of thing continues to happen to Irvin over the years, while the rest of the NFL Network desk guys – Eisen, Warner, Mariucci – never seem to have any of these kind of issues.

  46. the bottom line, ‘cuz Stone Cold says:
    February 8, 2023 at 2:19 pm
    I will really miss his excessively exaggerated annunciation.

    ——

    The Annunciation was when Gabriel came to Mary to tell her she’d be the mother of the son of God.

    You mean “enunciation.”

  47. I mean, I doubt Irvin was staying at the Glendale Motel 6. Any decent hotel is gonna have security cameras everywhere in their lobby.

    Would be pretty easy to tell if the “lady” was disturbed after the conversation.

  48. If she was standing around a hotel lobby with the Super Bowl in town, it’s not difficult to think she’s in the hotel “on business “. Maybe Irvin was mistaken, and she took offense.

  49. I have zero love for Irving or anything Dallas but I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions here. Obviously there will be video of the hotel lobby which will either cook him or exonerate him.

    Wait for the facts to come out!

  50. Have we learned nothing? “What law did I break?” is probably the worst thing you could say other than admit it. You’re better off in today’s world saying “I don’t know what happened, I was drunk” and leave it at that. Sometimes a thing is wrong even if it is legal.

  51. When you start counting how many former players have been fired from the league’s own network, the number is pretty startling. Irvin could be joining the club, depending on how this plays out. It’s a club that no one wants to be a member of.

  52. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But the court of public opinion is a different story.

  53. Those of us hasn’t said something ReallyReallyStupid when we was drunk may cast the first stone….Buurp.

  54. Don’t like him. He”s a loudmouthed blowhard. That being said, he deserves the benefit of doubt. Problem is nothing can be said anymore without offending someone.

  55. So he says it wasn’t sexual, he’s perplexed, it was just a conversation, he doesn’t remember. But it seems he’s not denying whatever he was accused of. Dude has always been a trash person. But having cocaine and prostitutes in his previous arrests wasn’t enough to keep him off the network, so whatever.

  56. This has been a constant long running problem at the NFL network hiring African American ex players getting into trouble and having to fire them . It seems that network has some serious flaws in there Human Resources dept. hiring process .

  57. mcbabble says:
    February 8, 2023 at 3:46 pm
    Those of us hasn’t said something ReallyReallyStupid when we was drunk may cast the first stone….Buurp.
    ————————————————-
    Perhaps you could call the network and Michael’s wife to put a good word in.

  58. All the people saying he’s innocent until proven guilty are assuming the NFL network did zero investigation before making this decision. It’s more likely they did a thorough investigation before making this decision and going public. Let’s see if ESPN keeps him on the air..

  59. Maybe he should have asked her “Do you know who I am?”

    But seriously, men would be able to protect themselves by never being alone with a woman who was not their wife or girlfriend to eliminate the he said she said conflicts, but I guess that is a thing of the past now too.

  60. Fire the over the top fawning Eisen while your at it minus one big ten school fans would cheer that move.

  61. I’m an Eagles fan who can’t stand Irvin, but let’s get some facts before we rush to judgment. Hopefully, there are witnesses to their interaction

  62. Tough situation until more details come out, that being said he does a weekly spot during the NFL season for my local radio station WFAN. Or at least he did a few years ago, not sure If he did it this year. Dude is funny as heck. Looked forward to hearing that spot every week.

  63. It’s a guess, but what about security cameras?
    The NFL nixxed Irvin, but it would be interesting if cams in the lobby prove Irvin’s take on what happened.

  64. As in all walks of life, sports media is populated with and inhabited by lotsa knuckleheads. HOWEVER, Michael Irvin is alone at the very pinnacle of the shyt-heap: the undisputed A-#1 biggest loud-mouth lip-flappin’ baloney-spewing cretin, bar none. No clue about this recent incident, but if Irvin is removed, de-platformed, & permanently banned from any further of his whiny imbecilic @ss-hat pontificating, won’t be soon enough, & couldn’t happen to a more deserving (sub)human.

  65. whitecomet77 says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:31 pm
    Look at Irvin’s track record. Nuff said.

    ———–

    Irvin would be an easy mark too for the same reason. Just let the evidence surface from the investigation. No one can be confirmed guilty by a PFT article.

  66. SeekTheTruthInHim says:
    February 8, 2023 at 1:15 pm
    RE: alarmbottle says:
    February 8, 2023 at 12:56 pm

    Of course he’s going to say he didn’t do anything.

    ——–

    Do you have any facts about what he did?
    Or do we take your Opinion as Fact?

    ______________________________________

    You mean like most of America takes things as fact when mainstream media tells you something. Only to be proven wrong time and time again

  67. As a celebrity, he should know that talking and/or touching any stranger is enough for them to accuse him of anything, which in todays culture will cost you your job.

  68. pioniere says:
    February 8, 2023 at 2:50 pm
    Innocent until proven guilty, but it’s interesting that this sort of thing continues to happen to Irvin over the years, while the rest of the NFL Network desk guys – Eisen, Warner, Mariucci – never seem to have any of these kind of issues.

    ___________________________________________________________________

    Not to steal off Sesame Street but ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER

  69. I don’t know if he did anything or not, but I’m just glad he’s off TV for a while.
    Watching his routine just makes me cringe.

  70. There has to be video in the lobby during SB week in a hotel that NFL personalities use, right? As for the removal from the air, he had a 45 second drunken conversation with a strange woman that he can’t remember while on a company business trip. That woman reported his behavior as inappropriate. NFLN is 100% correct to remove him until its sorted.

  71. People seem to have forgotten all about Irvin stabbing fellow Cowboy’s player Everett McIver in the neck over a haircut. Irvin shouldn’t be on TV at all. He’s not someone kids should look up to.

  72. Irvin shouldn’t be on TV at all. He’s not someone kids should look up to.
    ==========

    If you’re a parent, letting guys like this mold your kids lives, you have bigger problems than Michael Irvins employment status.

  73. I don’t see any description anywhere of what actually happened. I would assume that the NFL did some digging before pulling him from the coverage. And there’s got to be something there. They just don’t want to look bad and have an uncomfortable story during SB week.

  74. A handshake should be worth a few million in a civil suit. People with money should wear a body cam that’s on 24 hours a day.

  75. She probably pushed off, he was never called for that when he played. The real crime was him being in the hall of fame before Art Monk

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.