Judge grants Michael Irvin’s request for expedited discovery against Marriott

2022 NFL Draft - Round 1
Getty Images

Marriott wants the $100 million lawsuit filed against it by Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin to be dismissed. Even if that effort eventually succeeds, Marriott will have to cough up some information first.

Via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News, Judge Amos Mazzant II granted Irvin’s request for discovery against Marriott.

This means that Marriott must surrender surveillance video and other requested materials, such as internal reports, more quickly than the rules otherwise would allow.

The evidence must be given to Irvin by Tuesday, March 7, at 5:00 p.m. CT. The judge authorized Marriott to redact the name of the employee who complained about him.

In his lawsuit, Irvin claims that Marriott employees woke him up, escorted him from the hotel grounds, and informed NFL Network of the incident.

“Michael and I are pleased with the ruling, and we thank the Court for ruling so quickly and equitably,” attorney Levi McCathern told Gehlken. “We look forward to receiving the information that we believe will prove that Michael was engaged in no wrongdoing.”

In a recent filing, Marriott said that Irvin made “harassing and inappropriate comments” to the unnamed employee. That could make it more difficult to determine whether Irvin did or didn’t do what he’s accused of doing based only on the video surveillance.

Other documents and evidence become important to the question of whether the story shifted from an allegation of physical misconduct to something verbal in nature after, for example, it was realized that the video shows nothing improper.

Marriott seeks dismissal on the basis that it doesn’t actually own the hotel at which the incident occurred. Marriott argues that it merely licenses its name to the property.

21 responses to “Judge grants Michael Irvin’s request for expedited discovery against Marriott

  1. The longer this goes on, the more it sounds like the side that’s worried is Marriott.

  2. In order to follow along here at PFT I’m thinking I should sign up for the online Law Review at one of our fine universities. Jus’ sayin…

  3. Florio beat me to it. Other documents and evidence become important to the question of whether the story shifted from an allegation of physical misconduct to something verbal in nature after, for example, it was realized that the video shows nothing improper.

    Marriott has nothing on video. Its going to be a he said she said. Basically someone got their feelings hurt and Marriott overreacted based on that. They didnt expect to get sued over it. So now they just want the whole thing dismissed on a technicality that they dont actually own the property. LOL

  4. They kicked him out of the hotel?
    What in the world did he say to that woman?

  5. Mike is going to get paid. And, frankly, he deserves to get paid after this.

  6. I was in Mr Irvins side the whole time he’s getting paid very soon Marriott will settle this w/ a big check. He said she said I’ve seen the clip he doesn’t say anything to the ladies. Pure money grab.

  7. mackcarrington says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:56 pm
    They kicked him out of the hotel?
    What in the world did he say to that woman?

    ——————

    Yep. Obviously something happened. And, Irvin was drunk. Gee, Irvin with no memory and drunk or witnesses everywhere?

    Irvin just thinks because he has money he’s entitled to get off like all the rest of these people in our society.

  8. touchback6 says:
    March 1, 2023 at 8:42 pm
    mackcarrington says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:56 pm
    They kicked him out of the hotel?
    What in the world did he say to that woman?

    ——————

    Yep. Obviously something happened. And, Irvin was drunk. Gee, Irvin with no memory and drunk or witnesses everywhere?

    Irvin just thinks because he has money he’s entitled to get off like all the rest of these people in our society.

    ——————————

    You are going off nothing but speculation and siding with Marriott without any evidence. If he is so guilty why do the eye witnesses support Irvin? Why is the hotel so slow at releasing the video and why do they change their story?

    I never liked Irvin but by all accounts this conversation was not even a minute long and witnesses have come forth and said nothing about it was wrong. Even if he did say something a little off color is that reason to go def con 9 on him and his career?

    Irvin is entitled to defend himself as we all are. Most of us don’t have his resources and I am glad he is using them.

  9. It was likely a drunken verbal assault. He wants the video because it doesn’t show much and has no audio. It’s the ol’ “if the glove don’t fit, you must acquit,” defense.

    With his background there was very likely fine print in his contract to the effect; “Any negative incident of any nature.” He lost the broadcasting gig and all that money because he was drunk and stupid.

  10. Hotels generally have broad latitude when removing guests from their premises, as long as those reasons are not discriminatory. However, General Managers do not make that decision lightly, every benefit of the doubt is given to the customers, especially when that customer is a high profile employee of a major client such as one of the public faces of the NFL. The same NFL who has suspended him based on the information received from the hotel. He may eventually prevail against the franchise owner, he won’t win against Marriott International whose franchise agreements protect them against suits like this. They won’t settle either for that same reason.
    Irvin’s biggest beef, should be with his employer, who apparently has chosen to believe the accuser over him

  11. The discovery will probably determine if Marriot can be sued. If Marriot informed the league – then Marriot can almost surely be sued.

  12. And if it turns out Marriot told the NFL Irvin did something physical then Marriot will probably lose the case.

  13. If Marriott hadn’t acted on their employee’s claim, I’d bet that employee would be suing the company right now. Seems like Marriott is screwed either way.

  14. Irvin’s lawsuit is very much like his shtick on NFL Network. Lotsa noise and hype and hoopla without much substance.

  15. touchback6 says:
    March 1, 2023 at 8:42 pm

    Yep. Obviously something happened. And, Irvin was drunk. Gee, Irvin with no memory and drunk or witnesses everywhere?

    Irvin just thinks because he has money he’s entitled to get off like all the rest of these people in our society.

    12133Rate This
    —————

    “Obviously something happened”? Based upon what evidence that you have that nobody else does? And who are “these people”?

    I’m not “rich” but I tell you right now that if I believe a person is lying about me, going to destroy my career and my reputation, I’m going to fight back. I’d rather mortgage my house than just lie down and take it.

  16. Michael Irvin knows about terrible behavior, as he has done unlimited amounts of it in the past. Obviously he knows he did nothing wrong here, or he wouldn’t be full court pressing them in this manor.

  17. Question, what if they threw him out of the hotel and he got behind the wheel and hurt someone or worse? Seems like you let an impaired person sleep it off first

  18. If Irvin physically groped or touched the woman, then the video will show that. However, if he simply complimented her or even flirted or asked her out, is that a crime? Because if it is, 80% of the male population may be guilty of doing the same at one time or another.

  19. I think Michael is going to win this one….imagine that! If he wins it maybe worth more than 5 seasons of salary from his playing days!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.