NFL is “pleased” with ruling in Brian Flores case

Buffalo Bills v Cincinnati Bengals
Getty Images

Well, maybe there won’t be any appeals of Wednesday’s mixed-bag ruling in the Brian Flores litigation.

In a statement provided earlier this evening to PFT, the NFL seems to indicate that it will proceed to arbitration with the claims that will be arbitrated, and that it will proceed to litigation with the claims that will be litigated.

“Diversity and inclusion throughout the NFL make us a better organization,” Chief NFL Spokesman Brian McCarthy said. “We recognize there is more work to be done and we are deeply committed to doing it. That said, we are pleased with the court’s decision, which correctly holds that the vast majority of claims in this case are properly arbitrable by the Commissioner under binding agreements signed by each plaintiff. We intend to move forward promptly with arbitrations as directed by the court and will seek to dismiss the remaining claims.”

This means that, instead of appealing the decision to submit the other claims to the normal litigation channels, the league will file a motion to dismiss the claims made by Flores against the Broncos, Giants, and Texans. If successful, those claims end. If not, those claims head toward trial.

It also appears that Flores, Steve Wilks, and Ray Horton will not be appealing the ruling regarding claims that must be submitted to arbitration.

“We are pleased that Coach Flores’ class claims of systematic discrimination against the NFL and several teams will proceed in court and ultimately before a jury of his peers,” attorney Doug Wigdor said in a statement. “We are disappointed the court compelled arbitration of any claims before Mr. Goodell as he is obviously biased and unqualified to rule on these matters. We expect him to delegate those matters to a truly neutral arbitrator as a matter of fundamental fairness. We look forward to pursuing all these claims to trial in their various forums.”

Don’t expect trials to happen any time soon. There will be various phases and stages to the litigation, and arbitration, before final rulings are issued.

27 responses to “NFL is “pleased” with ruling in Brian Flores case

  1. Ok so answer me this. If the league is discriminating against him then how does he have a job?

  2. Great luck to the plantiffs. This type of suit is long overdue i love the NFL but the CTE case shows unfair the NFL can be.

  3. funny how people push the nfl for more diversity. Percentagewise, there is a higher percentage of head coaches that are black than in the overall population of the US.

    Percentagewise, there is a VAST percentage of players that are black than in the overall population of the US.

    And yet, they still complain about diversity?!?

  4. It’s a win for Flores and company as he put the NFL back on their heels… gut checking their ‘Good ole’ boys system

  5. By the time this is settled….most people will have forgotten about it

  6. This guy doesn’t stand a chance. There is no way he’ll be able to prove whatever he’s claiming happened to him

  7. bozobiden says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:37 pm
    Ok so answer me this. If the league is discriminating against him then how does he have a job

    ================================

    He doesn’t have a headcoaching job. The 40% of minority assistants rarely get to move up to become headcoaches. The hire pool is almost exclusively the other 60%.

  8. Like the Snyder story told us a few days ago NFL arbitration is a joke.

  9. If the league or teams didn’t do anything wrong let them have their day in court and make everything public.

  10. Good for Flo. Nice to see the little guy win over cooperations for once. Eri B not having job vindicated Flo case further.

  11. Ashley says:
    March 1, 2023 at 8:27 pm
    “biased and unqualified” — sums up Goodell perfectly

    —————–

    One of the biggest fraud criminals the country has ever seen.

  12. “marthisdil says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:40 pm
    funny how people push the nfl for more diversity. Percentagewise, there is a higher percentage of head coaches that are black than in the overall population of the US.

    Percentagewise, there is a VAST percentage of players that are black than in the overall population of the US.

    And yet, they still complain about diversity?!?”

    You don’t get it, do you? This is about diversity and representative numbers of people of color at all levels of the NFL, not just on the field. We need persons of color in the C-suites, in middle management, in head coaching positions, and in every other level of the business. Diversity is about having different kinds of people in the organization. Inclusion is about ensuring that those people have full and equitable access to all levels throughout the league. So far, that hasn’t happened to any significant degree. There’s a lot of work to do.

  13. “Diversity and inclusion throughout the NFL make us a better organization,” Chief NFL Spokesman Brian McCarthy said.
    *************************************

    What about Equity? If you had Equity, you’d be paying all the players the same salary and the teams would be comprised of players who look more like the local population. It seems these things only apply in-between carefully marked lines that are if nothing else, convenient to the DIE narrative.

  14. Ok so answer me this. If the league is discriminating against him then how does he have a job?

    ———————————————

    Well it’s not a real job, he’s coaching the desperate Vikings. It’s more of a paycheck than a job.

  15. I don’t know anything about this case, but I can just tell you by reading quotes from Flores’ attorney, they don’t think they have a winning case. If they felt confident about their case, I don’t think they’d be trying to sway public opinion, and I thought it sounded pretty bizarre. Just doesn’t sound like a winning attorney, to me. I seriously don’t give a hoot about this stuff, and I’ll be happy with any verdict. I’m not partial. And I’m not saying I don’t think they have a good case. I’m saying they don’t think they have a good case. They’re already making excuses. I’m sorry but winning teams don’t make excuses. They sound like they’ve already conceded.

  16. They’re “pleased” at whatever contains the least amount of friction.

  17. >> What about Equity? If you had Equity, you’d be paying all the players the same salary and the teams would be comprised of players who look more like the local population. It seems these things only apply in-between carefully marked lines that are if nothing else, convenient to the DIE narrative.

    Your definition of equity is inaccurate in my view. I would say, as far as payscale goes, that equity means that desire that roughly equivalently employees (talent-wise, performance-wise, experience-wise, etc) get paid roughly the same regardless of certain parameters like race, gender, and sexual orientation. It does not imply that a quarterback will be paid the same as a punter. Nor does it imply that Patrick Mahomes should be paid the same as Baker Mayfield. So, your comment that “you’d be paying all the players the same salary” misrepresents the argument made. There is a good conversation that could be had on this topic, but setting up a straw man to kick over makes it harder.

  18. Poor Vikings fans. They think their D is about to improve when all the team has done is hired a head case to run it.

  19. So instead of compelling discovery from 32 teams and the NFL, they get discovery from 3 teams and the NFL. The league is stilled screwed. The last thing they want is public exposure of their emails and text messages.

  20. All of you commenting about the NFL’s diversity, remind me again about how many African American owners there are.

  21. mikecrabtreeschain says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:57 pm
    bozobiden says:
    March 1, 2023 at 7:37 pm
    Ok so answer me this. If the league is discriminating against him then how does he have a job

    ================================

    He doesn’t have a headcoaching job. The 40% of minority assistants rarely get to move up to become headcoaches. The hire pool is almost exclusively the other 60%.

    ———–

    Why all the downvotes? Do people think there is no discrimination in the NFL and it’s currently equitable?

  22. Maybe I am ignoring stats, but I feel like any owner in the NFL would hire a purple and yellow giraffe to coach their team if they felt like they had the best chance to win. All business owners tend to hire familiarity to some degree but I really don’t think race
    Matters when it comes to hiring the guy they think will make them the most money, which usually entails winning

  23. perfect72 says:
    March 2, 2023 at 12:18 pm
    Maybe I am ignoring stats, but I feel like any owner in the NFL would hire a purple and yellow giraffe to coach their team if they felt like they had the best chance to win. All business owners tend to hire familiarity to some degree but I really don’t think race
    Matters when it comes to hiring the guy they think will make them the most money, which usually entails winning
    —–
    When it comes down to it, they are taking a leap of faith when hiring. What is being alleged is that NFL owners are MUCH more likely to take that leap of faith when the candidate is white AND that more patience is granted to white HCs once they have been hired. It’s going to be devilishly hard to prove without either concrete evidence or a mountain of circumstantial evidence. It’s asking owners and the NFL to admit that when it comes to the HC position that they think white guys are smarter/more capable.

    I’d love to see owners and GMs surveyed to rate HC and front office candidates blindly upon their resume and their answers to specific questions. Those results would go a long way toward exposing any internal biases.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.