Some perspective on the question of NFL millionaires vs. NFL billionaires

NFL: AUG 25 Preseason - Chiefs at Bears
Getty Images

As explained in Playmakers, NFL fans tend to align with the teams (and the owners of those teams) over the players. For the vast majority of fans, there’s no real difference between millionaire players and billionaire owners.

As a practical matter, there’s a gigantic difference. For starters, many players aren’t millionaires, not after taxes and living expenses and everything else that turns a million bucks into something far less than that.

And players have a limited time to make NFL money; most are out of the game before they even approach their thirtieth birthdays. They have no equity. Owners own the team as long as they want, until they sell. Or until their heirs sell. When they do (after years of making many millions over and over again), they realize the astronomical return on the original investment, whatever it may have been.

Myles Simmons and I discussed the dynamic of millionaires vs. billionaires during Friday’s PFT Live. For most people, however, it’s still difficult to appreciate the distinction. All that matters is that both millionaires and billionaires have more.

A reader suggested earlier today a great way to understand the difference between millionaire and billionaire. I double-checked the math, because the numbers were stunning.

If you receive one dollar for every second of every hour of every day, you’d have $100,000 in 27.78 hours. In 11.57 days, you’d have a million.

So when does the meter hit a billion? That would take 31.71 YEARS.

Keep that in mind when resenting the men who take the short- and long-term physical risks and who usually don’t have a million bucks in the bank when the game spits them out, and when softly applauding those who have more money than they could ever spend — even if they spent one dollar for every second of every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year.

30 responses to “Some perspective on the question of NFL millionaires vs. NFL billionaires

  1. Without the owners there would be no team or league for me to watch and cheer for. Of course im pulling for the owners. All day long. You can get players anyday…

    The NFLPA drives me nuts too.

  2. I think many fans are like me and just want to protect the quality of the games and the league. The other issue is that these billionaires earned most of their money thru businesses outside the NFL.

  3. Anybody who criticizes how much players make in sports is clueless to the reality of our world and society and how money functions in them. The economic gap in this country from top to bottom is growing at an astronomical rate, and the people blasting athletes for making millions and for negotiating higher salaries just goes to show the growing gap of intelligence in this country from top to bottom as well. Our country’s billionaires want the American people to be poorer, angrier, less informed, and more divided because it’s good for their businesses. So when i read these comments from web-warriors who sound off on players complaining about being taken advantage of by the league’s owners, and they comment that they deserve more money too or that the players should be happy with what they get, i laugh, because these comments are coming from people that arent the best at what they do, who dont have skills that set them above the competition they see and feel everyday, and who expect to be given something that they havent earned. Athletes embody the best of us as a people, of what we can accomplish, but it doesnt last, and their efforts make others rich beyond their wildest dreams, and in the end the athlete is used up and cast off, while the fat cats purr and laugh at how the rest of the country doesnt dream as big as they do. Anyone who doesnt see this, go ahead and give me a thumbs down lol

  4. Cry me a river. Fans line up with the teams because that’s who we want to win the games! If a player goes to another team to make more money, they are within their right, but a fan wants to see his team win. Pure and simple. To fans, it is all about the team. To the player they will say its all about the team, until it isn’t which is usually when their contract is up.

  5. You might add in the fact that you’re comparing the earnings of someone’s first real job after college with the lifetime’s accumulated wealth of some of the richest people in America.

    I don’t really understand how there is anything to discuss here. It’s like you’re comparing a new programmer at Microsoft to Bill Gates. I don’t get how there is anything to discuss.

  6. Yes they do have equity, in their personal identity, jersey an likeness. Granted not every athlete gets a shoe deal or even a sandwich named after them from a local place, but it is theirs and free to use that outside of football in any fashion they chose or what an agent can get them.

  7. I think this has less to do with millionaire v billionaire and more to do with the fact that the millionaire player is going to leave my team at some point. I’m hopeful that the billionaire keeps my team in my city – so, selfishly, that’s where this shakes out.

  8. Some perspective…from two rich people who insist they must not be rich because they know people who are far richer.

  9. And I give a real person’s perspective on the millionaires and you’re too scared to post it because you want to pander to the players. Not surprised.

  10. Next generation, it’s going to be interesting when LeBron and Brady and Mahomes start owning teams.

  11. Fans aren’t aligning with billionaires, Mike. Fans usually want to keep their favorite team intact. With a salary cap, a few bloated contracts can prevent that. “Keep that in mind when resenting” the owners and the NFL.

  12. Another perspective on millionaires vs. fans. Many fans are blue collar workers for whom $50,000 would represent a really good yearly income. It would take such a person 20 years to earn 1 million dollars. For many fans, an NFL player earns far more in a year than they will earn over than entire life. And as for the “living expenses” that take a player’s money in the bank to under a million, it is true that buying $100,000 cars and multi-million dollar houses, etc., will take a chunk out of one’s savings, but then agin most blue collar fans cannot really identify with such extravagant lifestyles.

  13. As said previously, fans side with teams/owners because a salary cap exists, and players asking for a larger piece of the salary cap hurts your team’s ability to win. We don’t care about how the money anyone makes, we just want the most quality players on our roster as possible.

  14. What burns me a lot more than what a player makes is when a billionaire owner wants the taxpayers to pony up for their stadiums. Or when the owners cheated the players by creative accounting and kept many millions of dollars out of the shared revenue pool. That was 2015, I believe, and it would be going on indefinitely if it hadn’t been discovered during an NFLPA audit.

    The average player’s total career earnings don’t come close to what most owners make in a single year. Millions of Americans want to watch football and they want to watch the best possible players. The kind of sustained effort needed, and the willingness to take on the high risk of serious injury earn them more money than most Americans make from their jobs. Fine by me.

  15. PLayers are what entertain me> The owners are just a bunch of guys who are born on thirdbase and want you to think they hit a triple. These guys are the same guys who care less about blue collar workers, let alone the poor. It’s sad to see a bunch of working poor thinking they have a shot to be a billionaire, so they protect the status quo. You will never be in their club, they dont want you.

  16. Everybody sides with the average players. Everybody. But he ones who say $30,000,000 isn’t enough. Yeah, we don’t side with those guys.

  17. The Packers’ owners don’t seem to be from another class. They are people to whom I can relate.

  18. sugarbears says:
    March 4, 2023 at 1:52 pm
    Cry me a river. Fans line up with the teams because that’s who we want to win the games! If a player goes to another team to make more money, they are within their right, but a fan wants to see his team win. Pure and simple. To fans, it is all about the team. To the player they will say its all about the team, until it isn’t which is usually when their contract is up.

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Until the billionaire owner packs up his team and moves to greener pastures. That doesn’t happen quite as often as players switching teams, but ask people in Baltimore, Oakland, Cleveland, San Diego or St. Louis about this. Some cities got back teams, but not all of them and then you can see who you want to root for if there is no longer a local team. Your logic applies to college but not to the pros.

  19. I side with the teams because players are temporary. Teams will always be there, even if they move to another city. Current players will not. The league will still be there long after Rodgers or Burrow, etc. im also sick of hearing about players are risking health. They know full well what the risks are and nobody forces them to take that risk, they willfully do it. They can always work like the rest of us but THEY CHOOSE the risk that is football.

  20. I side with the teams because players are temporary. Teams will always be there, even if they move to another city. Current players will not. The league will still be there long after Rodgers or Burrow, etc. im also sick of hearing about players are risking health. They know full well what the risks are and nobody forces them to take that risk, they willfully do it. They can always work like the rest of us but THEY CHOOSE the risk that is football.

    Exactly, sir! Exactly!

  21. Yeah, no. It doesn’t matter in the slightest how much of a gap there is between players and owners, because they are all part of the hyper-elite 1% class in society. They are all hoarders of wealth and drivers of inequity and greed.

    It’s the gap between the haves and have-nots in society that matters. The have-plenty and have-more-than-plenty don’t deserve any concern, because they are all set for life and are all taking too much.

    Players get wealthy with only a few voluntary years of employment. Why should they have any equity in something they didn’t create that they move on from in a few years? It’s silly.

    The purpose of pro sports is entertainment. They should cost much less, be much more accessible, and pay a lot less to owners and players alike. What we have now is grotesque and getting worse.

  22. Players come and go, but fans are fans of the team. Probably less about siding with the owner in most cases, and more about a natural bias toward the team.

  23. This isn’t a mystery. The interests of the fans align with the interests of the owners.

  24. Two way street millions and billions to owners and players have not made the game better. In all reality many can take or leave the NFL game today. Fantasy football has kept many younger fans engaged not the game itself. The game today with millions involved has become more of the extras stuff than the score of the game. Workers out on the street are happy there are owners no matter what they make.

  25. On the flip side I used to be a season ticket holder for under $250.00 a year. I reached my own financial limit giving the rich folks any more $$. Now we approaching the point where almost ALL games to view on TV will have to be paid for. AT THAT point again I will reassess,and possible stop watching NFL football forever.

  26. Billionaires’ wealth is typically not particularly liquid. For example, Mark Davis is a billionaire because he owns the Raiders. To actually have that in cash to pay the players more, he would have to sell the team.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.