Are Raiders in play for Aaron Rodgers, or not?

Oakland Raiders v Green Bay Packers
Getty Images

The future of Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers continues to be a beautiful mystery. Then again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Some would regard the whole thing as a hot mess.

Adding a little heat to the happenings is the question of whether the Raiders are a realistic destination for Rodgers. Vic Tafur of TheAthletic.com has said it’s not likely to happen. The betting markets say otherwise, making the Raiders the prohibitive favorites to get him. Most recently, Dan Graziano of ESPN.com put the Raiders in play for Rodgers.

The broader question is whether Raiders coach Josh McDaniels and Rodgers will click. McDaniels may want to coach Rodgers a lot harder than Rodgers is used to being coached. McDaniels, after years coaching Tom Brady, may not know of any other way to effectively coach a quarterback.

We asked McDaniels at the Scouting Combine whether coaching Brady for so long has ruined other quarterbacks for McDaniels. But Rodgers could be the closest thing to Brady that McDaniels would ever see.

Maybe McDaniels would be willing to tiptoe around a delicate genius. Maybe McDaniels knows that having a delicate genius is better than having no genius at all.

However it plays out, Rodgers, Patrick Mahomes, Russell Wilson, and Justin Herbert being in the same division remains a possibility.

76 responses to “Are Raiders in play for Aaron Rodgers, or not?

  1. Seems like the only ones all over this are the media commentators, trying to stretch a story into reality. The only right answer to the question will come from the Raiders or Rodgers…or not.

  2. Never ever take anything the Raiders beat writers say as gospel. There is no other journalists in the history of mankind as bad at their jobs as they are.

  3. These posts about teams being in the mix for Rodgers is useless until the drama queen decides if he is playing, then decides what team he is interested in.

  4. I want Rodgers on the Raiders purely to stick 2 more losses a year to Russell Wilson and the Broncos.

  5. I figure Rodgers has known his decision for awhile and now just enjoying watching the Packers squirm just because he can…

  6. This is almost as bad as TDS 24/7 almost but not quite. I already said NO this is not happening, no way, no how, The Radiers are not paying him 60 million to play for them for 1 year. I cannot say it strongly enough NO

  7. Packers arent restructuring all these contracts and mortgaging their future for nothing. If you haven’t noticed they’ve quietly gotten pretty comfortably under the cap by converting salaries to signing bonuses to future years. Tells me they’re going to go all in for one more run. He’ll be in Green Bay for one last run book it. This talk is 1 year premature, next year they’ll deal him and move on with Love.

  8. Brian Gute should maybe call Josh McD and tell him they will trade Rodgers to the Raiders for Davante Adams and two first round choices.

  9. Might be fun to watch McDaniels and Rodgers take each other down in flames. Might be tedious, too.

  10. Only a fool would go to that division. The smart way for him is to go somewhere where he can win the NFC south, or maybe Tennessee.

  11. No player with options wants to play for Josh McDaniels. He’s a soulless, Belichick-wannabee who makes life miserable for his players and unlike Belichick, he doesn’t ease the misery by winning.

  12. hogbuster7 says:
    March 5, 2023 at 3:21 pm
    Packers arent restructuring all these contracts and mortgaging their future for nothing.
    ___________

    Restructuring contracts does not equate to mortgaging the future. The Packers have always been good stewards of the cap, especially for future years. I’m pretty sure that Gute and Russ Ball know more about managing the salary cap than internet GMs.

  13. hogbuster7 says:
    Packers arent restructuring all these contracts and mortgaging their future for nothing.
    ====================================================
    Yes they are now $20 mil under the cap with a few players they want to re-sign. But I have a different take on it. They want to shore up the O Line with a couple FA’s. Maybe a mid level veteran WR to boot.

  14. Rogers is, or has been, one of the best over the years. But, honestly, why would anyone want him at this point? He doesn’t seem all that interested and he’s probably going to walk away a lot sooner than later. Teams/media make it sound like he’s the hottest thing since sliced bread, but I don’t think the benefits will outweigh the cost to get him.

  15. “Rodgers is playing in GB and will retire after the season.” then it will be as a backup to Jordan Love.Packers management does not want to lose their number one pick in the draft who has shown consistant improvement to them for three years and may be their starting quarterback for another ten years or more.they need a team leader who actually shows up for football practice in the spring with his team.

  16. Tony Awesome says:
    March 5, 2023 at 4:11 pm
    hogbuster7 says:
    Packers arent restructuring all these contracts and mortgaging their future for nothing.
    ====================================================
    Yes they are now $20 mil under the cap with a few players they want to re-sign. But I have a different take on it. They want to shore up the O Line with a couple FA’s. Maybe a mid level veteran WR to boot.
    __________

    A decent WR would be very helpful. The O Line will be fine now that Jenkins is fully recovered and playing guard, as long as a decision is made about Bakh. Need to know if Bakh can play full time. If not Nijman can be full time. It was the constant shuffling last season because of Jenkins being out at the beginning and Bakh’s on and off availability that hurt the O Line.

  17. heLLpaso says:
    March 5, 2023 at 3:02 pm
    Never ever take anything the Raiders beat writers say as gospel. There is no other journalists in the history of mankind as bad at their jobs as they are.
    ————————

    You just stated one of the things that Rodgers might find appealing about playing in Vegas. Who wouldn’t want to face the media there vs in NY?

  18. heLLpaso says:
    March 5, 2023 at 3:02 pm
    Never ever take anything the Raiders beat writers say as gospel. There is no other journalists in the history of mankind as bad at their jobs as they are.
    ——————————————
    The betting market and Dan Graziano of ESPN are not Raider beat writers. By the way, most team beat writers asses any player which may be available in a trade that would help the team they write about. Patriot beat writers are talking about Hopkins. Chiefs’ beat writers are talking about listening to calls about Edwards-Helaire. It’s that time of the season where most anything can happen. You shouldn’t believe it all.

  19. Packers arent restructuring all these contracts and mortgaging their future for nothing.

    I think they are preparing for the dead money they will have. Pushing some cap into future years when they will no longer have Rodgers cap hit. Gives them flexibility now instead of waiting for the dead money to be done.

  20. I think Zach Wilson and Josh McDaniels could be a great duo. I was also the first one to mention Sean Payton/kyler Murray as great pair and that didn’t happen, so what do I know.

  21. The Raiders playing coy is the way to go. The only way this happens is if Rodgers forces a trade by saying the Raiders or I go nowhere. Then LV has leverage on GB and gives up a 2nd rounder at most. Digging into Rodgers contract you will also see the 60M the media keeps talking about becomes far less in 2023 (and 2024) if the deal becomes valid post June 1. Doing that also allows the Raiders to NOT give up any picks in 2023 so any draft picks would be 2024. The Raiders would be able to fix their D and not overpay for a Rodgers Rental(tm).

    ALL of this has to happen for the Raiders to be realistically motivated.

    Odds on that (despite Vegas bs) I put at 5% or less.

  22. The Raiders will trade 2 first round picks & 2 second round picks and pay real housewife nihilist Aaron Rodgers $60 Million for 1 year of crazy town drama show … or not

  23. Doesn’t matter. He’s not winning anything anyway.

    Let’s get back to obsessing over Daniel Snyder.

  24. Raiders are so far away from contending they would be better off trading their assets to start over

  25. Rodgers plays this annoying game every year, and the Packers top brass lets him play them for fools, every year. He’s returning to the Packers……for another failed season.

  26. It’s official: I’m now more sick and tired of the Aaron Rodgers drama than I was of Colin Kaepernick.

  27. gibson45 says:
    The O Line will be fine now that Jenkins is fully recovered and playing guard, as long as a decision is made about Bakh.
    ===========================================================
    The right side of the O line is not okay. And Myers at center isn’t impressive either.
    The Pass Pro has to be better than last year. Bahk will be fine. Nijman and Runyan have to do better. They’re okay but on most teams they’d be depth.

  28. McDaniels did a great job with Mac Jones. He can coach young players. Rodgers is uncoachable at this point and the Raiders offense is precision based. Rodgers sandlot style won’t work there.

  29. bondlake says:
    It’s official: I’m now more sick and tired of the Aaron Rodgers drama than I was of Colin Kaepernick.
    ====================================
    Who’s creating the Drama ?? Aaron ? I don’t believe he’s said much other than he would talk with Gutey the week before FA starts. What did you hear Aaron say ?

  30. This year’s story to make the AFC West the greatest division ever. How’d that work out in 2022? Realistically, can the Packers trade Rodgers, take a $99 million cap hit, and field a team? How is that possible?

  31. bondlake says:
    March 5, 2023 at 5:54 pm
    It’s official: I’m now more sick and tired of the Aaron Rodgers drama than I was of Colin Kaepernick.

    Just out of curiosity, where did the DeSaun Watson drama fit in?

  32. Please, no!!! This team already has about 3 times as much drama as it needs. Signing the NFL’s biggest diva would break the locker room even more than it is now–and that’s a lot, especially when McDaniels and his staff may be gone in another season.

    Time to trade up and draft a good rookie prospect who could start now and grow, just as with Allen, Mahomes, and Burrow.

  33. Don’t wait. Designate Love as the starter and inform Rodgers he’s the back-up if he returns to Green Bay. It doesn’t even have to be true, not any more. Rodgers understands lying, and he’s OK with it. If nearly 35% of all conservative voters still like Trump, then you know millions are just as OK with lying as Rodgers is.

  34. I agree with those here who think he will stay in GB. It makes too much sense for all involved, and the potential other options make too little sense.

    He’s in a winnable division in the far-weaker conference. Unless there’s something about where he is that has become intolerable to him, the best option for all involved seems to be to keep him in GB, and go hard in the FA market and draft for win-now options.

    What *wouldn’t* make sense is GB keeping him but doing more of the same mushy nonsense in the draft and not pursuing FAs. If you’re keeping Rodgers, it’s to win now. If you don’t want to do that, move him and start over.

    SF will be in flux at QB for a while. The Eagles are turning over their coaching staff. The Vikings and Giants aren’t as good as their results were last year. The Cowboys are reliably a mess. There is opportunity in the NFC.

  35. If the Raiders add Rodgers, are they suddenly better than the Bengals, Bills or Chiefs? No, they are not. Draft Anthony Richardson and let’s see in a couple of years.

  36. Rodgers is undermining his own stock value buy publicly & constantly questioning his own future. Teams won’t give up huge draft picks if his hearts not in the game & GB will just get tired of his constant games keeping everyone on edge guessing & will move onto the future, especially if he doesn’t attend pre season training.

  37. The only reason you’re sick of the Aaron drama is because PFt writes a story every day. He actually hasn’t commented in weeks. The whole sports media does the same thing. The quieter he is, the more coverage he gets. If you hate him, just don’t read the same piece everyday, they’ll be real news soon enough.

  38. The potential for being exposed as a QB in decline both in skill and work ethic is another reason he won’t be going to that loaded division. He won’t be at the bottom of that group, but he won’t be comparable to the top.

  39. As a Packers lifetime fan and part owner! I guarantee he will be back with the Packers again this season! Anybody that has common sense already knows this! All the media just trying to stir up controversy! He’s not going to be playing for no Raiders!

  40. Agreed the packers all in strategy for this year is a hot mess. As is the contract the packers grovelled to Rodgers last year.

  41. No! Green Bay is trapped with a mortgage on an upside down property with a high interest rate. They would love to unload it on any foolish AFC Team. Don’t flush away the future on a drama Queen that is a horrible leader of men.

  42. As long as he’s not coming to Seattle… Please, John and Pete, stay the heck away.

  43. It is time for the Packers to turn off the lights and throw away his locker room key. Rodgers gives me a headache.

  44. You can’t hallucinate away terrible offensive play calling, bad OL play, injuries, and a bad defense. Rodgers is not stupid.

  45. If he goes anywhere it will be to Vegas. But I doubt he is going anywhere.

  46. “Rodgers could be the closest thing to Brady that McDaniels would ever see”. Not at his present age. Just gonna say this, considering what the Raiders would have to give up to get him, Rogers is not an upgrade over Carr. They need too many players to give up multiple draft picks for a 40 year old quarterback. They would have to win it in the next two years to make the trade be worth it, and that defense is more than a year or two away.

  47. I think the answer will be here in less than 2 weeks! 95% Packers 3% Jets 2% Raiders 0% retiring!

  48. I hate this idea that bullying and humiliating players is called “hard coaching.” It should be called being a jerk. It’s the only thing neanderthal coaches with zero communication skills know how to do. Younger players are more mature and don’t want that nonsense.

  49. What qualifies Rodgers as a genius? He may be a gifted quarterback, but he’s no genius.

  50. Green Bay is in position to get the best center in the draft and get a replacement for Bakh. The young WR they have will now have a year of experience under their belts and be better for it. Packers run a steady ship. I don’t think that Rodgers is going anywhere.

  51. itsizzi says:
    March 5, 2023 at 3:01 pm
    Seems like the only ones all over this are the media commentators, trying to stretch a story into reality. The only right answer to the question will come from the Raiders or Rodgers…or not

    ————————

    What seems to be happening is sports reporters are putting out stories with different QBs to the Raiders. Later when they learn which story was right they will pull the wrong ones and act like they called it all along. Until they know anything though you just have to put up with every possibility being reported simultaneously.

  52. For all this drama and posturing, I believe Aaron has loved being a Packer and respects that legacy in his own bizarre way. He’s not going anywhere. I agree with the comment above, he’ll have one last shot and then retire a Packer. He’s not looking to be compared to Favre any more than he already is. He will retire a Packer next year.

  53. Tony Awesome says:
    March 5, 2023 at 6:15 pm
    gibson45 says:
    The O Line will be fine now that Jenkins is fully recovered and playing guard, as long as a decision is made about Bakh.
    ===========================================================
    The right side of the O line is not okay. And Myers at center isn’t impressive either.
    The Pass Pro has to be better than last year. Bahk will be fine. Nijman and Runyan have to do better. They’re okay but on most teams they’d be depth.
    ____________

    I agree regarding the right side. Oddly enough, Nijman is better at LT than RT. Zach Tom plays hard, but he is seriously undersized. Disagree regarding Myer, he played well last year.

    The problem with pass protection was that Bahk was essentially week-to-week all season. I absolutely love Bahk but he has to be available every week.

  54. The Raiders GM, Ziegler has talked about how they need to rebuild the defense with draft, and I agree I wouldn’t trade any picks for an aging quarterback on the decline.

  55. No one is bigger than McDaniel’s. Someone do the story on why he and Carr really clashed!

  56. Chris Simms Doobie says:
    March 5, 2023 at 9:34 pm
    I hate this idea that bullying and humiliating players is called “hard coaching.” It should be called being a jerk. It’s the only thing neanderthal coaches with zero communication skills know how to do. Younger players are more mature and don’t want that nonsense.
    _________

    100% agree. Today’s young folks want to be respected and they should be. Yelling, screaming, and acting like a maniac does not show respect and has never been the best way to communicate.

  57. It’d be entertaining for sure. Classic case of subtraction by addition since to get him they’d have to give up a bunch of the pieces around him needed to win games. And what is the over/under for Rodgers disagreeing with whatever McDaniels is selling?

  58. Or not

    Rodgers-McDaniels would end quicker than a Hollywood marriage.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.