Based on surveillance video, Michael Irvin’s lawyer calls allegations against Irvin “nonsense”

Harold And Carole Pump Foundation Gala
Getty Images

Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin and his lawyer are on the offensive.

A day after attorney Levi McCathern had the ability to watch Marriott surveillance video of the alleged interaction between Irvin and the hotel employee who accused him of wrongdoing, McCathern called the allegations “nonsense” during a press conference, via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News.

McCathern said he was not given a copy of the video. He also wasn’t allowed to record what he saw, or to show it to Irvin. He has filed an emergency motion to force Marriott to surrender the video.

Apparently, Marriott restricted McCathern’s access without authorization from the court to do so.

This sickens me, this sickens me,” Irvin said, in a video posted by Gehlken. “Because in this great country, it takes me back to a time where a white woman would accuse a black man of something, and they would take a bunch of guys that were above the law, run in a barn, put a rope around his foot and drag him through the mud and hang him by a tree.”

Irvin complained that Marriott ignored repeated attempts to show the company what really happened between him and the employee.

“How can I defend myself if I don’t even know what I’m defending myself against?” Irvin said.

He explained that he meets people each and every day walking into and out of hotel lobbies during football season.

“This just blows my mind that in 2023, we’re still dragging and hanging brothers by a tree,” Irvin said. “That blows my mind that I have no opportunity to defend. I don’t even know what I’m defending.”

Irvin later reiterated that he knows he didn’t do anything wrong. If he didn’t, and if Marriott can’t show that he did, Marriott will have a big problem.

Then again, it already feels like Marriott has a big problem, based on the way Marriott has been dealing with the situation.

114 responses to “Based on surveillance video, Michael Irvin’s lawyer calls allegations against Irvin “nonsense”

  1. This isn’t a black or white issue Michael. This is today’s social state of mind . Crucify everyone black or white or any other color.

  2. Speaks more to the whole culture than the segregation era, but nonetheless he’s not wrong. He has every reason to be furious over this.

  3. We don’t know anything yet, but if Marriott has a problem, then the TV network should, too.

  4. Marriott to Irvin, so how many Benjamin Franklin’s would you need to make this go away?

  5. Here, I agree with Mike 100%. Marriott waiting to be forced to hand over the video means they know they have a problem. Based on their reluctance, I bet they took the accuser at her word and now realize there’s no evidence to substantiate the complaint. Looks similar to the Duke lacrosse case in that respect.

    Let’s all remember that Irvin was falsely accused of rape years ago – only to have the accuser subsequently admit she fabricated the whole story for money. She went to jail.

    I hope Michael gets a substantial settlement from Marriott and a public apology. Once again, sounds like a woman trying to get money from Michael and it also sounds like it’ll end the same way.

  6. Marriott as it was best said in Die Hard – the quarterback is toast! If they had anything on Irvin, it would already be released and on TMZ.

  7. If this is a fabricated story to get money from Michael then this woman should have to serve jail time!

  8. He’s right, and the reference to Our history of lynchings is apt.

  9. Wow.

    He has the nerve to use the race card and compare his conduct to innocent people who were lynched for no reason at all. This guy’s checkered past is well known. He was drunk and likely doesn’t even remember his behavior that night.

    I’ll take numerous witnesses’ testimonies as employees and the tape over his story, thanks very much. His NFL career and tv status doesn’t precdent over the truth and how Goodell and the NFL has allowed these people to treat women in general, Watson being the latest being the latest example.

    These people become so used to having their butts kissed, it becomes normalized for them.

  10. uuggghhh he had to play the race card. Now he lost me. I mean this stuff happens all the time, I just seen a news report how some woman that was pictured with Rodgers Brady Mahomes and Allen in the golf tournament was using the photo to scam people’s money. Maybe it had more to do with him being a celebrity, but everyone knows today playing the race card works so well, but that card is being overplayed and starting to lose it power. I guess in this matter Irvin sees race first, which some know what that means

  11. This is like when the tapes were burned so BB couldn’t exonerate himself from Spygate and Fraudger.

  12. It’s pretty rare that I find myself on the side of Michael Irvin, but this is definitely one of those times. I hope he puts it to Marriott

  13. There is still no mention, by Mariott or others, what the specific complaint was.

    All we know is that a Mariott employee complained about Irvin. Mariott called the NFL and got Irvin removed from Super Bowl activities.

  14. Irvin was there during the incident, he KNOWS what he is defending….unless what he actually did is indefensible. It’s not Marriott’s job to ensure Irvin have evidence for his defense. Marriott HAS to protect themselves, just as Irvin’s is trying to do. Let’s not just give Irvin the benefit of the doubt while not giving that same benefit to Marriott and/or the accuser. What happened to the mantra ‘Believe ALL women’? Does that slogan suddenly not matter when the woman is accusing a black former athlete? If that is the case, then this slogan, and others, can be SELECTIVELY used depending on the race of the parties involved. Got it.

  15. Well, he lost me with the lynching reference, this has nothing to do with that, it’s a money grab, color means nothing.
    I hope he wins his lawsuit.

  16. Mike, what is the logic behind the way the Marriot is managing access to the video in your opinion? Are they trying to avoid public leaks that would make them look bad? I imagine if it showed something terrible had happened TMZ would have had the video the first day.

  17. He semi-lost me at the “Hanging brothers from a tree” remark. Marriot and/or the employee may (probably) be in the wrong but the race angle cheapens the whole thing.

  18. He had me until he compared it to racism. If he had just said he had done nothing wrong, I’d be fine. Why bring race into it? It has NOTHING to do with race. Come on Michael you should be better than that. How about she just basically “Lied” and accused you because of who you are? Not because the color of your skin. ZERO to do with race…. again in a situation but it’s brought up.

  19. Before Marriott when to Irving’s room to throw him out in the middle of the night why didn’t they look at the video before putting themselves in a position to be sued? If the video showed clear evidence that Irvin did something reprehensible, Marriott would gladly release the video. If Marriott has nothing to hide, then releasing the video can help Marriott’s reputation. And what does this say about the NFL Network and ESPN for convicting and punishing Irving without any proof that he violated his contract.

  20. Another “modern day lynching” (eye roll). Maybe next they will compare it to Sept 11?

  21. While I hope the truth vindicates whomever needs vindication, nobody is being dragged or hung. Maybe Irvin’s name is being dragged a bit. But the correlation holds no water in my opinion. Settle your lawsuit dude, and move on.

  22. NcCathern was not given the video because he and Irvin want to use it to harass the victim. The court has already ruled that the victim’s identity should not be released. If McCathern and Irvin had the video they would use it to publicize the victim in the hope that enough people would attack her on social media, at her job, and even at her home.

  23. dryzzt23 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:32 pm
    Irvin was there during the incident, he KNOWS what he is defending
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.

  24. Sounds all too familiar, it’s amazing what video evidence reveals. Even after the fact when the truth was hidden to deceive the population.

  25. He’s Right. He should’ve NEVER Been pulled from the SuperBowl Coverage and removed from his position on NFL Network based Solely on the UNSUBSTANTIATED accusations of 1 person. No matter how Uncomfortable it may make some people feel, OUR Country has Historically BELIEVED “KAREN”. Whether it’s been the “Central Park 5” with the Central Park jogger
    Travesty or the Murder of Emmitt Till. Although the stakes weren’t nearly as high for Michael Irvin but the Damage has already been Done. I hope that he gets EVERY PENNY he’s Suing for!

  26. radar773 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:29 pm
    There is still no mention, by Mariott or others, what the specific complaint was.

    All we know is that a Mariott employee complained about Irvin. Mariott called the NFL and got Irvin removed from Super Bowl activities.
    _______________

    Marriott did not get Irvin removed, the NFL Network made that decision all on it’s own. Marriott called the Network because Irvin was belligerent and refused to leave the hotel when asked. He’s lucky that he was not arrested for public intoxication.
    01Rate This

  27. ——
    dryzzt23 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:32 pm
    …. What happened to the mantra ‘Believe ALL women’? ….
    ———

    it was a flawed mantra from the start, it should be

    Listen to ALL women
    Investigate ALL claims
    Present the truth based on the evidence and facts

    and ‘women’ can be substituted with ‘people’

  28. We don’t know enough to determine whether or not race played an issue.

    We do know enough to know that he wasn’t lynched, or murdered in any other way. That sort of hyperbole isn’t going to help his case.

  29. charliecharger says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:18 pm
    We don’t know anything yet, but if Marriott has a problem, then the TV network should, too.

    ***************************************************************

    My thoughts EXACTLY! How is the Network somehow not culpable ? This is why I believe Michael Irvin said what he said about lynchings. His Career was in essence “lynched” during one of the highlights of his broadcast career! That’s Honestly Sad. What will be even sadder is the amount of down votes this post gets because I speak FACTS!

  30. clk55amg36 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:41 pm
    Before Marriott when to Irving’s room to throw him out in the middle of the night why didn’t they look at the video before putting themselves in a position to be sued?
    ___________

    Hotels have the right to remove anyone they wish from there property, especially when a person is drunk and harassing other guests and employees. And do you really believe that a Renaissance Hotel would remove a celebrity without first confirming what happened?

  31. I LOVE BIG ( . Y . ) says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:48 pm
    dryzzt23 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:32 pm
    Irvin was there during the incident, he KNOWS what he is defending
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.

    ————

    I don’t interpret it that way. I think Irvin is saying his interactions in the lobby were pretty normal and inconsequential and he did nothing, so he’s wondering what he could possibly be accused of.

  32. I’m still on his side. But seriously ditch the race card or you’ll lose millions of us. False accusations are made daily. White on white, black on black, purple on green, you get the gist. It’s always about vengeance, or in his case money. You really think a woman working at a hotel hosting hundreds of Super Bowl personalities decided the next black man that walked in she’d “take to the barn”? No. She saw you as a former football player, currently on tv, and dollar signs filled her head.

  33. gibson45 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:47 pm
    NcCathern was not given the video because he and Irvin want to use it to harass the victim. The court has already ruled that the victim’s identity should not be released. If McCathern and Irvin had the video they would use it to publicize the victim in the hope that enough people would attack her on social media, at her job, and even at her home.

    ——-

    That’s a weird thing to make up. They want to see the video, just like anyone else that was accused of something would want to see the video. Nothing special.

  34. Race card? Really? You better be squeeky clean after that, mr attacked a guy with scissors once.

  35. I LOVE BIG ( . Y . ) says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:48 pm
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.

    85Rate This
    —————-

    So if I claimed you hit me at work when you didn’t, you lost your job, and there is video you wouldn’t want to go to the tape trying to defend yourself? You’d just be cool with saying “No I didn’t” and hope someone believes you and g8ves your job back?

  36. It might have been more responsible to stop the analogy before it got all the way to lynching, but he’s not wrong about the dynamic of who does or doesn’t get trusted and what often feeds into that. The degree of seeming overreaction from both the league office and Marriott suggests Irvin was given no benefit of the doubt whatsoever, let alone a neutral opportunity to address the issue before being punished.

  37. I believe the victim (a woman) and Marriott (her employer). The media demands that I, a male, ‘believe ALL women’, especially during March because it is womens month. 9 days ago, the media would demand that I believe Irvin, because of black history month.

  38. I was in Irvin’s camp until he played the race card. Now wondering what he did do wrong that he needs to pull that card out. This stuff happens all the time. An accusation to a public figure is almost always guilty until proven innocent in the court of public opinions and especially the media. It doesn’t matter what color you are.

  39. I LOVE BIG ( . Y . ) says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:48 pm
    dryzzt23 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:32 pm
    Irvin was there during the incident, he KNOWS what he is defending
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.
    —————
    Umm, Irvin is the plaintiff here. He doesn’t need to defend anything. He was forcibly removed from a Marriott owned hotel based on an allegation of sexual wrong doing, and that video would be his proof that he didn’t do it and that the allegation was false and harmed him. Yes, he’s entitled to the video as part of the discovery process.

  40. Jack Nicholson once said that, as a celebrity, he meets more people in a day then some people will meet in an entire lifetime. But the cretins say he is guilty because he doesn’t remember what transpired. Irvin demanding the release of this video makes me believe he is innocent. Ray Rice and Kareem Hunt were not wanting video of their “interactions” released. And yes, his comparison when a woman accused him of sexual aggression resulting in the loss of his livelihood and the presumption of guilt before any investigation of tape is apt. It happened all the time including in my lifetime and I live in the north. If you went to a fast food restaurant and claimed to be given the wrong change, the manager would get out the video before handing you a single penny from the drawer yet this guy lost millions plus a damaged name which affects his life and his family without anybody bothering to check the tape. I hope the accusers which include media and hotel have to issue a public apology.

  41. Sorry dryzzt23, Marriott can’t hide ANY evidence that relates to the case. Irving will file a motion to compel.

  42. Not a Cowboys fan, nor can I say I am a ‘fan’ of Irvin (indifferent)….but I will be cancelling 67 currently booked rooms at Marriott for a reunion…..1 hour before the deadline to cancel which will give them NO TIME to re-book. The new reservations have already been secured at one of their competitors and the attendees have been notified (and agree) so it will just be funny as hell. No place in society for crap like this.

  43. You don’t have to be a BBIPOC person to make the connection to false allegations leading to what Clarence Thomas called a public lynching. If he lost you by stating facts, you are truly lost.

  44. If it’s a cop beating video it’s released within a day or two. Marriott has nothing and owes Irvin for lost wages and legal expenses.

  45. gibson45 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:47 pm
    NcCathern was not given the video because he and Irvin want to use it to harass the victim. The court has already ruled that the victim’s identity should not be released. If McCathern and Irvin had the video they would use it to publicize the victim in the hope that enough people would attack her on social media, at her job, and even at her home.

    1332Rate This
    ——————————————————————————————
    There are ways around that are referenced in the article. They could have asked the judge for a “protective” or “non-disclosure” order when the judge ordered them to turn it over. But they didn’t, they just decided on their own to play more games.

  46. Anyone who doesn’t want all available video of a controversial incident released has something to hide.

  47. I LOVE BIG ( . Y . ) says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:48 pm

    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.

    _________________________

    OR… now try to stick with me here….. He is being accused of something of which there is video evidence. He knows he did nothing wrong, he knows the video shows he did nothing wrong, and therefore he wants access to that video to use in defense of the accusation.

  48. cincykpal says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:31 pm
    Surveillance videos do not record audio

    ———-

    He called her a bad name. Have to call the nfl… seriously people today are so soft and week. Especially in Cincy apparently.

  49. The lynching comparison was made by Irvin, himself. Not by his attorney.
    The attorney should have refused Marriot’s offer and stuck to his guns. “Provide us with a copy of the video as the court ordered. Anything less and we’ll see you in court.”

  50. I do think Irvin has been targeted. Having said that, being metaphorically dragged through the mud in the court of public opinion is not a good reason to invoke atrocities like lynching. This is not that. So, quit talking and let Marriott pay the piper.

  51. What we need to know is why was the Marriott able to call Irvin’s bosses and get him essentially fired? Were they providing all of the rooms free of charge for the NFL and felt it was their duty to report what happened? Either way, I can’t see any scenario where Marriott should have been snitching on Irvin. Looks like by trying to cancel Michael Irvin, Marriott may be the one who ends up getting cancelled.

  52. Not sure Marriott has a problem of any kind here. They aren’t the accuser(s). I wouldn’t turn over my video without a court order, either. Not in a million years. Simple liability issue.

  53. What will the Review Booth say about that video when it gets out, which is only a matter of time.

  54. I was a strong defender of him and I hate the Cowboys and him but now I’m rooting for the hotel to prevail. He just had to pull the race card and ruin it for everybody. Only a racist brings that into all subjects of life.

  55. Seeyounexttuesday says:
    March 8, 2023 at 2:13 pm
    I LOVE BIG ( . Y . ) says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:48 pm
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Right. If he knows he did nothing, he doesnt need the video. It makes it sound (I’m not saying this is reality, just how is actions come across) as if he knows he did something, but he needs to see what the cameras caught, so he can create his defense.

    85Rate This
    —————-

    So if I claimed you hit me at work when you didn’t, you lost your job, and there is video you wouldn’t want to go to the tape trying to defend yourself? You’d just be cool with saying “No I didn’t” and hope someone believes you and g8ves your job back?
    =====================================================================================
    First, HE is the one that used the word “defend”. Not me. I’m just going by what he was saying. Secondly, there is going to be a trial, and that video will be played at trial. So if you claime3d I punched you, and I know I didnt, the video will show that. See how that works? He doesnt need to “see” the video

  56. If there is something damning on that tape, I would think that the Marriott would happily turn it over to Irvin and his lawyer. It seems like Irvin is in good shape here, so there was no need to pull the race card.

  57. gibson45 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 2:02 pm
    clk55amg36 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:41 pm
    Before Marriott when to Irving’s room to throw him out in the middle of the night why didn’t they look at the video before putting themselves in a position to be sued?
    ___________

    Hotels have the right to remove anyone they wish from there property, especially when a person is drunk and harassing other guests and employees. And do you really believe that a Renaissance Hotel would remove a celebrity without first confirming what happened

    ______________________

    Absolutely if the celebrity in question is a black man and the accuser is a white woman. You can accuse a black man of anything and a large portion of society will believe it.

  58. Seems like people are more upset that Irvin said race played a factor than Irvin harassing a woman or a woman falsely accusing him of wrong doing. It’s weird how many white people have convinced themselves that racism doesn’t exist to the point that they believe absolute strangers are not even capable of being racist.

  59. I disagree with those calling it a money grab by the accuser. We have not heard that the woman is even suing Irvin. The only suit is Irvin suing Mariott.

    It’s only a money grab if the woman sues for money. That has not happened.

  60. Looks like Irvin has been wronged, however why is he using the race card 😡 He’s let himself down badly with that and is no different to the woman falsely accusing him, because her feelings may have been hurt.
    It’s not a race issue, it’s today’s society issue 😡

  61. There should be stiff penalties for people who makes false accusations. In this case a person got fired. The judge needs to send a strong message to deter people from fabricating stories. Fortunately, Mr. Irvin is well off. Can you imagine if the accused was an ordinary person struggling to get by, working a 9 to 5 job? Lose their job. Lose their home. If it turns out that accusation is false, accuser should spend multiple years in prison.

  62. Yes, Irvin and his lawyer are ratcheting up the rhetoric. They should. Irvin’s reputation was damaged. In order to repair the damage, they are going overboard a bit to get everyone’s attention. People clutching their pearls need to get over it

  63. buffman716 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:26 pm
    uuggghhh he had to play the race card. Now he lost me. I mean this stuff happens all the time, I just seen a news report how some woman that was pictured with Rodgers Brady Mahomes and Allen in the golf tournament was using the photo to scam people’s money. Maybe it had more to do with him being a celebrity, but everyone knows today playing the race card works so well, but that card is being overplayed and starting to lose it power. I guess in this matter Irvin sees race first, which some know what that means

    ————–

    That’s how you kind of know he’s grasping at straws here. My guess is Marriott is going through it’s legal protocols taking their team while Irvin panics and tries to curruy favor with the public, playing the victim role. Lots of people with power and money obviously do this because they’re so used to it working.

  64. kemp13 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 3:04 pm
    Not sure Marriott has a problem of any kind here. They aren’t the accuser(s). I wouldn’t turn over my video without a court order, either. Not in a million years. Simple liability issue.

    ————–

    Exactly. People just don’t know the law. Irvin is just irritated he can’t remmeber what he did or said after being out all night drinking and probably being loose with the lips and actions.

    Without a tape, he’s paranoid since he can’t rememember.

    Why would numerous hotel employees risk their jobs?

  65. Irvin was drunk, which means that he was drinking inside the Marriott. Irvin has a troubled past so, using legal phrasing, a ‘reasonable person’ can assume that Irvin did something stupid to the victim. In the end, Irvin will try to sue Marriott and claim that the bartenders forced him to drink alcohol and then forced him to walk in the direction of the victim. When will Irvin be held accountable for his actions? We all KNOW he did it.

  66. Earvin Bird says:
    March 8, 2023 at 3:35 pm
    There should be stiff penalties for people who makes false accusations. In this case a person got fired. The judge needs to send a strong message to deter people from fabricating stories. Fortunately, Mr. Irvin is well off. Can you imagine if the accused was an ordinary person struggling to get by, working a 9 to 5 job? Lose their job. Lose their home. If it turns out that accusation is false, accuser should spend multiple years in prison.
    ______________

    For the 45th time, Irvin was not fired. He did not lose his job. He was removed from a single television appearance, nothing more. He remains employed by the NFL Network to this day. He has not lost a single penny.

  67. bullcharger says:
    March 8, 2023 at 2:06 pm
    gibson45 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:47 pm
    NcCathern was not given the video because he and Irvin want to use it to harass the victim. The court has already ruled that the victim’s identity should not be released. If McCathern and Irvin had the video they would use it to publicize the victim in the hope that enough people would attack her on social media, at her job, and even at her home.

    ——-

    That’s a weird thing to make up. They want to see the video, just like anyone else that was accused of something would want to see the video. Nothing special.
    ______________

    Female victims are harassed by the perpetrators’ families and friends all of the time. They are also harassed by the general public. Just look at vitriolic the comments are here against the victim in this case.

  68. Last week Mike confessed that he was too drunk to remember the incident.
    Now he feels exonerated? Of what?
    Nobody ever accused him of physically assaulting anyone but I’ll damn sure bet he said something crazy to set this person off. Until we hear the audio (if it exists) none of us know what really happened. The video is meaningless.

  69. If Marriott were innocent, the video would have been leaked all over the place. Marriott, ESPN (or his network) and this women will be paying up. It doesn’t even sound like he is willing to settle now; good for him. Thank god he had some witnesses there too.

    All these companies so scared of upsetting employees, they never stop to think if the employees are the problem. Marriott gonna learn the hard way.

  70. Wow he makes it sound like Mariott is a person. Its a company that has laywers who watched and probably have sound too of a video of him and didnt like what they saw so they filed a suit against him.
    He’s right about one thing, they have a rope and its the tape. If someone is accusing him of something then they have proof that someone is telling the truth.
    Irvin IMO knows exactly what went down and is playing the stupid innocent black guy.

  71. statistically, more NFL players have been guilty of sexual assaults than have ever been lynched.
    .
    wouldn’t he have to prove the intent was for him to lose that gig though. if she feels assaulted she is free to say so. if the NFL fired you for that, not her fault.

  72. gibson45 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:47 pm

    NcCathern was not given the video because he and Irvin want to use it to harass the victim. The court has already ruled that the victim’s identity should not be released.

    —————————————————————————————-

    That should be “alleged victim” at this point.

  73. This is not a race-based reaction by Marriott; it might very well be a short-sighted and very ignorant business-based reaction, but it’s not based on MI race. If anything, the issue likely results from MI wealth and fame.

    The entire matter at this point appears-emphasis on appears!- to be an ill-fated attempt by an employee hoping to set the stage for a money grab opportunity, which is now veering off the rails.

  74. While Irvin was not fired, he took a huge hit by being banned from the Super Bowl. NFL analysts use the Super Bowl to help their careers. Irvin likely lost a lot of money and maybe some sponsors. I don’t blame him for suing.

  75. You white folks just don’t get it. Everybody in the Black community understands his lynching reference because it’s something we all experienced in one for of another. Being persecuted simply because of the color of your skin. If this was Tom Brady the conversation would be different and I doubt the NFL Network would have pulled him off the air without hard evidence. We understand there is a double standard particularly when it comes to Black men. Look at the DOJ report how the Louisville police referred to Black men as monkeys, animals and boys. This is our experience being Black in America and you folks will never understand it on your side of the line.

    As for the case, the hardest thing Marriott has to deal with is not just the video, but independent witness who have no relationship with Michael saying they were there and nothing happened. Apparently the video only supports their version of events.

  76. radar773 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 4:48 pm
    While Irvin was not fired, he took a huge hit by being banned from the Super Bowl. NFL analysts use the Super Bowl to help their careers. Irvin likely lost a lot of money and maybe some sponsors. I don’t blame him for suing.
    ________________

    Irvin has been an analyst for over 20 years. If he was going to advance any further it would have happened a long time ago. Losing a single one hour television hit on the Friday before the Super Bowl is not going to hurt his career one iota.

  77. I’ve been in his corner all along, but he lost me at “We’re still dragging and hanging brothers by a tree.” I’m tired of modern-day comparisons to the horrific racial injustices of yesteryear.

  78. Chiefs fan in LA says:
    March 8, 2023 at 4:14 pm
    statistically, more NFL players have been guilty of sexual assaults than have ever been lynched.
    .
    wouldn’t he have to prove the intent was for him to lose that gig though. if she feels assaulted she is free to say so. if the NFL fired you for that, not her fault

    _____________________

    Statistically, more black men have had more wrongful convictions overturned than any other group.

    Being falsely accused of a crime has more potentially devastating consequences for Irvin than most. If he feel that he is wronged he should fight back against her allegations.

  79. Take a lie detector test Mike. Granted it’s not acceptable in court but they are about 98% accurate using the latest technology. Get the woman to take one too.

  80. This woman obviously targeted Irvin because he was black,gruesome to look at,but a valid argument on Mike’s part in this observers opinion.

  81. Anyone who read even one of the bazillion media stories hyping Irvin’s supposed bad acts at that hotel has no reason to whine about Irvin holding a press conference to use the same media that crucified him to help clear his name.

  82. Statistically, more black men have had more wrongful convictions overturned than any other group.
    ….

    and that applies here how?
    a. i said players which would include all races…
    b. nobody here has been tried or convicted of a crime…
    .

  83. So a he said/she said is being compared to lynching? Couple that with Marriott maybe having to defend a female employee with a “me too” like accusation because men are unfairly guilty until proven innocent in these cases and fear of the backlash they would get if they didn’t side with the employee? We are truly seeing the decline of western civilization.

  84. Why mention that the women was white? If she was black Irvin would never of said so! He was up to NO good, no doubt. So he now spins it and blames the women cause she’s white!

  85. mikecrabtreeschain says:
    March 8, 2023 at 5:33 pm
    Statistically, more black men have had more wrongful convictions overturned than any other group.

    Being falsely accused of a crime has more potentially devastating consequences for Irvin than most. If he feel that he is wronged he should fight back against her allegations.
    _______________

    I totally agree with your first paragraph. As I hope you have seen, you and I are among the few here who call out the bigotry displayed against Lamar Alexander.

    However, in this case Irvin committed an assault against a woman. That is absolutely unacceptable regardless of what race Irvin is. There are way too many people who do not care about sexual assault. Just look at the overwhelming number of comments here dismissing what happened to the victim. Women deserve protection just like other minorities.

  86. So Irvin was too drunk to know exactly what he said to the woman, but not too drunk to know she was a racist for being offended by it. Smh.

  87. not everything that happens to a person that is not white happens because they are a person that is not white. mike could have chosen to not go down that road. we will never advance as a society until we can all agree with that and realize that some people are just a$$holes regardless of color (and white is a color too). sorry mike, i was with you until now. now i just dont care anymore

  88. Chiefs fan in LA says:
    March 8, 2023 at 6:12 pm
    Statistically, more black men have had more wrongful convictions overturned than any other group.
    ….

    and that applies here how?
    a. i said players which would include all races…
    b. nobody here has been tried or convicted of a crime

    _____________________

    Because I went down your rabbit hole of irrelevant with you. (A. Irvin is not an NFL. B. What does occupation have to do with sexual assault?) But since we are here you used the word guilty not me. And it applies here because before there can be a conviction there must first be an accusation. So black men are more likely to be falsely accused than any other group matter of fact its happened to Irvin before

  89. If proven false, that last needs to be imprisoned for a lengthy amount of time.

  90. My biggest issue is that Marriot was order to turn over the video but they strait up have refused. They wern’t told to show Irvin’s lawyer the video, they were ordered to turn it over and Marriot has lawyers that know what the court said. Idk if this is a symptom of our current culture where people ignore reality and just live fantasy lives but the court should fine Marriot for ignoring their court order and if they don’t start doing what they are supposed to, the court should just rule a summery judgement against them for more than Irvin is asking for. If one side chooses to be uncooperative trying to muddle the court system and make things harder for the other side and the court, they deserve to be punished.

  91. Its not a race issue, that was nonsense they dont need to make here, but it is a money issue, and it does sound like Irvin is getting screwed. Marriott and employees thought they could make some claims and get away with saying they could not show the proof of what happened really. Or maybe they just ran with the accusations on one person’s say so without checking, then found out after they were already liable that the evidence doesn’t back them. Either way, they did real damage to someone who is calling them out and suddenly digging in and balking at giving info to support a topic they themselves initiated. Until the video is public we are all only guessing, but my own guess is that if the video backed Marriotts story there would not be all these excuses and attempts to not show it.

  92. radar773 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:29 pm
    There is still no mention, by Mariott or others, what the specific complaint was.

    All we know is that a Mariott employee complained about Irvin. Mariott called the NFL and got Irvin removed from Super Bowl activities.

    ————————————

    They originally accused of inappropriate physical contact, then when the topic of the video arose they changed that to inappropriate speach, something the video cant disprove. But changing their accusation did not change the fact of the original one and what it had caused to happen to Irvin. Even though there updated accusation will likely never get proven/disproven they will still have to answer to their original one that caused the damage.

    My guess is that it was a money grab attempt by a single person, their employer tried to back their employee but did some big money damage to someone in the process, and only after that damage had already been done is when they checked the video did they realize they were in trouble now, and thats when the story change and excuses for not providing the video all started.

    If Im wrong the video will show that.

  93. touchback6 says:
    March 8, 2023 at 1:23 pm
    Wow.

    He has the nerve to use the race card and compare his conduct to innocent people who were lynched for no reason at all. This guy’s checkered past is well known. He was drunk and likely doesn’t even remember his behavior that night.

    I’ll take numerous witnesses’ testimonies as employees and the tape over his story, thanks very much. His NFL career and tv status doesn’t precdent over the truth and how Goodell and the NFL has allowed these people to treat women in general, Watson being the latest being the latest example.

    These people become so used to having their butts kissed, it becomes normalized for them.

    ——————————————-

    Just assuming accusations are true without caring to see the evidence is exactly how Marriott got themselves in trouble. I see you have even taken it further to assume further details than even Marriott put out.

  94. This is all on the networks that took him off the air, why is nobody talking about that? If nothing happened and if they did their due diligence then this would not even be an issue. Nobody is coming after Irvin.

  95. Who said it was a physical act? The video may show nothing. Perhaps it was a verbal, threatening assault. She reported it. He doesn’t remember because he was drunk. He’s the victim? Please.

  96. Football says:
    March 9, 2023 at 6:51 am
    Its not a race issue, that was nonsense they dont need to make here, but it is a money issue, and it does sound like Irvin is getting screwed. Marriott and employees thought they could make some claims and get away with saying they could not show the proof of what happened really. Or maybe they just ran with the accusations on one person’s say so without checking, then found out after they were already liable that the evidence doesn’t back them. Either way, they did real damage to someone who is calling them out and suddenly digging in and balking at giving info to support a topic they themselves initiated. Until the video is public we are all only guessing, but my own guess is that if the video backed Marriotts story there would not be all these excuses and attempts to not show it.
    ____________

    If it was a money issue the victim would be making a claim for damages. She has not.

    Irvin has not suffered any damage. He was not fired and remains employed by the NFL Network to this day. Irvin has not lost one penny because of this situation.

  97. It’s interesting how many people just automatically go to “money grab” without actually thinking about what they’re saying. Did the employee sue Irvin? No. Did Marriott sue Irvin? No. Did Marriott remove Irvin from SB broadcasts? No, it was his employer.

    An employee has a right to complain about treatment from a guest – there is no “standard of evidence” for this. That employee has nothing to gain from any of this, but she does have the threat of being threatened and dragged through the mud by the usual gaggle of braindead misogynists.

    The dispute is not about the employee, it’s about Irvin’s behavior when Marriott decided to oust him in the middle of the night, and his employer’s decision to remove him from the SB broadcasts. He hasn’t been fired.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.