Will Commanders make a play for Lamar Jackson?

USA TODAY Sports

Here’s something that was said on PFT Live, #PFTPM, and multiple other shows. I recently realized it hasn’t been mentioned here.

The Commanders may make a run at Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson.

The light first flickered after the Commanders hired Eric Bieniemy. Coach Ron Rivera admitted during a Super Bowl-week interview with PFT Live that Sam Howell was QB1. Rivera made it clear that, one year after the Commanders literally called every other team to see if they had a quarterback available in trade, the Commanders won’t be looking for a veteran starter.

Of course, that was before the Ravens gave Jackson a qualified shot at the open market, via the non-exclusive franchise tag.

Obviously, Lamar is a better option than Howell, from a football standpoint. Jackson would be far more expensive, and the question would become whether the investment makes sense to the team, from an overall roster construction and cap/cash allocation standpoint. From a football standpoint, he clearly would make the Commanders better.

And if owner Daniel Snyder is selling (or if he ultimately isn’t), adding Jackson would be the perfect bright, shiny object to distract from the ongoing controversies. If it makes the team better, attitudes toward Snyder would change, whether he’s still there or not.

If he sells and if the team improves under new management, people could be inclined to credit the new owner. But if Snyder adds Jackson before Snyder exits, it will be impossible to not give Snyder credit for making the move.

Giving Jackson a fully-guaranteed deal (which the Ravens likely wouldn’t match) also would stick new ownership with the bulk of the bill. And it likely wouldn’t affect the purchase price. Anyone who owns the team will have cap and cash obligations. Jackson will simply be part of the player payroll for the new owner.

Then there’s the most fascinating point. With fully-guaranteed contracts for veteran players currently frowned upon, Snyder could give his soon-to-be-former partners a gigantic middle finger as he rides his superyacht into the sunset.

So, yes, it makes sense for Snyder to explore it, on multiple levels. It frankly makes too much sense to not pursue the possibility.

81 responses to “Will Commanders make a play for Lamar Jackson?

  1. Snyder being forced to sell, so in a final middle finger to whoever he’s forced to sell to (especially if it’s Bezos) he saddles the franchise down with a QB with a worrisome injury history and hands over two first round picks right before selling.

    Yea, I can see him doing something scummy like that.

  2. This would be expected under the leadership of Dan Snyder.
    Any other owner or GM: Haynesworth Redux or maybe Robert Griffin IV

  3. Jackson ending up in the dumpster fire that is the Washington franchise would make a poetic end to this unendingly dumb spectacle.
    Not sure if Baltimore would be willing to deal with a geographical competitor though.

  4. Not likely. First, any team that wants Jackson will have to be willing to change their offense to take advantage of his unique skill set. Second, they must be willing to spend the time to negotiate an agreement, a process which will take hundreds of hours and made more laborious because he represents himself. Third, in all likelihood the Ravens will match the agreement so the entire process will be a waste of time.

  5. Why would anyone give a running QB who can’t stay on the field and has won one playoff game in his career a huge contract? The Browms may have but they already sunk their franchise with the Watson guaranteed contract.

  6. It seems logical, Snyder definitely fits the whacky rebel owner mold. For the actual football part, DC does have players and coaches to provide the credibility and wins. Going against Hurts twice a season at least would also be good football probably.

  7. After everything I’ve read about Snyder I could absolutely see him giving Lamar a fat fully guaranteed contract and watching 30 owners heads explode and put the new owners in cap hell…

  8. Lamar Jackson isn’t worth 2 first rounders and a guaranteed contract. Period. End of story.

  9. Fedex field has claimed the legs of RG3, Alex Smith, Joe Burrow and Adrian Peterson. Lamar would be wise to dat away.

  10. andyreidsmustache says: March 9, 2023 at 1:09 pm

    Snyder being forced to sell, so in a final middle finger to whoever he’s forced to sell to (especially if it’s Bezos) he saddles the franchise down with a QB with a worrisome injury history and hands over two first round picks right before selling.

    Yea, I can see him doing something scummy like that.

    **********************************************************

    I could see Snyder wanting to do that. But he won’t because it’d drive the value of the franchise WAY down and could cost him 5% of the franchise value. So $300 mil.

  11. It would be insanely stupid to give up two first round drafts picks for Jackson.

  12. originalsteelcurtain says:
    March 9, 2023 at 1:13 pm
    Why would anyone give a running QB who can’t stay on the field and has won one playoff game in his career a huge contract? The Browms may have but they already sunk their franchise with the Watson guaranteed contract
    ————–
    Well I’d say because Jackson is better than Wentz who they trotted out much of the year and with an owner likely on the way out and a coach possibly(probably?) on the way out without a playoff berth they’d be looking at only trying for immediate results not future repercussions. Jackson and Howell(If/when Jackson is hurt) is a definite improvement over Wentz/Heineke and likely means a playoff berth at least which would likely save Riveras job

  13. Turns out there’s not much demand for quarterbacks who skip playoff games, have proven impossible to negotiate with, are often injured, and are better runners than passers. Lamar needs an agent who can convince him he isn’t as good or indispensable as he thinks he is.

  14. Jackson at QB, Kemp was added as WR and I believe Bieniemy will talk Commanders into trading for Clyde Edwards-Helaire at RB. Offense could look very different next season

  15. dryzzt23 says:
    March 9, 2023 at 1:09 pm
    Now the MEDIA is tampering with players under contract
    ———-
    You should really go look up what the word tampering means before misusing it again

  16. Dan Snyder has been holding Washington hostage for almost 25 yrs. Acquiring Lamar Jackson would be such a Snyder thing to do as a parting gift.

  17. Yes, Washington ought to make a play for him. First off, their offense is already run-heavy, so his talents already mesh with their scheme.
    Second, Ron Revera has worked with Cam Newton before, so he knows how to use and coach mobile QBs.
    Third, they are not necessarily in position to draft a day 1, starter, so they may have to trade to do so anyway. Might as well do so for a known, quality starter.

  18. But if Snyder does that, potential buyers presumably are not stupid, and could back out or lower their offer, which is not something Snyder wants.

  19. I suppose that’s one way to spin it…

    Forking out 2 first round picks and saddling a team with a Watson/Wilson-esque terrible contract is another….

    Whomever takes Jackson at the terms Jackson wants and sends those picks away is going to regret it. And any thought of Bieniemy as a HC is going to end if he’s the guy pushing for that disaster.

  20. Florio is finally seeing the light. Just because teams say they aren’t interested… it doesn’t mean it’s true.

    However, don’t be surprised if Lamar’s market is just a couple teams. That’s especially true if Rodgers gets the NYJ job. Any team would be blowing up their cap/offense signing Lamar. Either way, I don’t think Lamar gets the exact contract he was looking for. Injury concerns are real too. The only bright side there, is that running QBs have been less desirable—they can find an affordable backup or rookie for cheap.

  21. I don’t think the writer really appreciates the financial bind Snyder is in…he cant come up with the guaranteed money that would be needed to be place din escrow

  22. Please, please, please make this move, Danny – Boy. It would be a continuation of his fan boy ways going back two decades.
    It is somewhat sad to see how far this once proud franchise has fallen.
    That is all.

  23. Maybe they already discussed the Lamar option internally, and decided not to pursue him. Did anyone ever think of that ?

  24. IF any team were to break the 31 team pact, I can easily believe it would be the Commanders!

  25. Makes no sense. Foolish free agent signings is why the Commanders had so much failure. Building the right way now and a huge QB cap number would hinder resigning our core. Pass

  26. That’s a lot of bad reasons that would ultimately be bad for everyone involved, except perhaps Jackson.

    Jackson as a player would be an asset to most teams, and a big upgrade for at least half the league. But his cost is outrageous, and it’s been 3 years since he completed a full season. In practical terms, his value to other teams peaked in his MVP season 3 years ago.

  27. Do you think Snyder has the liquid capital to put a huge chunk of this magical mega-contract signing bonus into escrow to make this happen? I sure don’t!

  28. A purchaser would lower the price they pay for the franchise to compensate.

    But how they might assess the effect on the salary cap and loss of draft chices is another matter.

  29. $10m/year guaranteed contract and give up 2 chicken sandwiches? You bet.

    $40-$50m/year guaranteed and give up 2 first rounders? Go pound sand.

  30. I can see the Commanders doing that for sure given the circumstances.

    Here is a question for everyone:

    The NFLPA works for all players, equally, right? The unending escalation of QB salaries leaves ever other player with a smaller part of the pie to enjoy. Is it be part of the NFLPA’s responsibility to the other ~98% of its members to somehow put a ceiling on just how much of the salary cap one player can account for?

    Mike Florio & Team – what do you-all think?????

  31. dryzzt23 says:
    March 9, 2023 at 1:09 pm
    Now the MEDIA is tampering with players under contract
    ————————————————
    Please tell us all who is under contract? Lamar is in limbo land. His contract expired and he has been tagged, but hasn’t signed the tag. According to the terms of the tag he can negotiate with any club. The Ravens will have an option to match the offer or receive two first round picks from tht club. Again, who is under contract?

  32. 32 teams may make a run at Lamar Jackson. I believe he’s a Raven. 32 teams may make a run at Patrick Mahomes. “May” is a very important word.

  33. You guys are priceless. Now, if a team signs Lamar, it’s sabotage. All I know is don’t let Lamar go to the NFC. Both he and Hurts would rule the NFC Championship game for years to come. The other QBs simply cannot compete. Oh, my fault, I forgot about golden boy, Purdy, who has more playoff wins than Jackson. What a feat! What a remarkable MVP talent like the NFL has never seen! Purdy and all of his 7 wins is destined for the HOF.

  34. NO team is going to pay an often hurt running QB, who has missed roughly 10 games in the last 2 seasons, and quits on his team mates, a fully guaranteed contract like Lamar seems to be stuck on! LOL End of story.

  35. If Lamar wants to make headway on the “fully guaranteed” contract issue for the NFLPA, it’s not gonna happen if he’s asking for 5 years, $50M a year.

    The going rate for top-tier 5-year QB guaranteed money is about $130M. Lamar should take a 5 year $140M fully guaranteed deal. Nothing more. Cut out all the other frills.

    Otherwise it’s all ego.

  36. No, they will not. No one is coughing up two 1st Round picks and forking over that kind of contract.

  37. I would never think such evil on my own, but now that the idea has been breathed into existence I can’t stop thinking about a 10 year $560M fully guaranteed contract right before he sells.

  38. Florio, no way it happens. He doesn’t have the money to put in escrow to cover the signing bonus.

  39. Two first round picks for Jackson, A veteran MVP. Or Two first round picks for a number one lottery ticket from the Bears. Option A is a no brainer.

  40. It would be hilarious if he gave him a $250 million guaranteed contract – no signing bonus – and then sold the team.

  41. He has already demonstrated he is selfish, self-centered, and not a team player. No team should go for this at any cost. And his only asset, his legs, are now damaged. He cannot be counted on and that is going to make him a pariah.

  42. vottorific says:
    March 9, 2023 at 2:21 pm

    Two first round picks for Jackson, A veteran MVP. Or Two first round picks for a number one lottery ticket from the Bears. Option A is a no brainer.

    ===

    It’s not just two first round picks, though. It’s a huge contract that he wants fully guaranteed, for a player who’s failed to finish two straight seasons, compared to a healthy player who’s 5 years younger on a rookie contract. Or option C: just wait ’til next year to get a new QB.

    Jackson’s a great player but the equation is complicated.

  43. Jackson I believe would make Washington markedly better, but Snyder’s ego is too monstrous to have the Commanders immediately succeed as soon as he sells the team. He would be the butt of jokes, even more so than he is now, for the rest of his life.

  44. If Dan Snyder signed Lamar Jackson to a 5-year $250 million fully guaranteed contract, it would increase the value of the Commanders, not decrease it. The Commanders would immediately get at least two more prime time games, they would have an excited fan base and they would win again. The Ravens have won 75% of the games that Lamar Jackson has started since entering the NFL and he is only 26 years old.

  45. This is the team that should. Just brought in Eric Bienimey, make a splash with Lamar. Next on the list of teams that should be interested (no particular order) the Jets, Bears (and then trade Fields to the Commanders), Falcons, Dolphins, Texans, Colts, Raiders, Lions (and trade Goff to the Commanders).

  46. Regardless of what Danny Boy does or doesn’t do involving Lamar, guaranteed contracts are coming. Between Burrow, Herbert and Hurts one of them will get the guaranteed bag. Maybe all three. All three are also better than Jackson at QB.

  47. nite2al says:
    March 9, 2023 at 2:06 pm

    You guys are priceless. Now, if a team signs Lamar, it’s sabotage. All I know is don’t let Lamar go to the NFC. Both he and Hurts would rule the NFC Championship game for years to come. The other QBs simply cannot compete. Oh, my fault, I forgot about golden boy, Purdy, who has more playoff wins than Jackson. What a feat! What a remarkable MVP talent like the NFL has never seen! Purdy and all of his 7 wins is destined for the HOF.

    ===

    Seeing how Jackson has lost playoff games against Ryan Tannehill, Phillip Rivers, and Josh Allen (only managing 3 points in the latter game), I’m not sure who he’s clearly better than.

    But Hurts sure does look like the real thing. He’s already shown he can play well when the lights are brightest.

    As for Purdy, 2 playoff wins in two months of starting sure looks like a bargain compared to 1 playoff win in 5 years. And he’s just starting a rookie contract.

  48. Perish the thought. The last thing we need is a super-expensive, injury-prone running back that, by the way, sometimes serves as a mediocre-at-best passer. Let’s build a great Oline that would enable any reasonably good pass-first run-second QB to thrive. Long ago, the Skins won 3 SB’s with 3 different reasonably good but definitely not elite passers… because of its monster Oline. Same approach still works today, and it’s a lot easier to build a strong/deep line than it is to secure a (unicorn) Mahomes/Burrow/Rodgers.

  49. This isn’t A nightmare scenario. This is THE nightmare scenario. The team has a chance to take advantage of a rookie contract, giving them the opportunity to stabilize the roster elsewhere and grow some more via the draft before having to devote a third of the cap to a QB. Further, giving up the next two first-round picks? That would be an insanely irresponsible move….which is why it’s probably going to happen. That’s exactly how much of an a$$ Dan Snyder is.

  50. Maybe they already discussed the Lamar option internally, and decided not to pursue him. Did anyone ever think of that ?
    ————
    Why announce it then? Wouldn’t said team be better saying nothing and let other teams bid thinking there’s more competition? Don’t tell me it’s to keep fans from getting excited.

    Is it be part of the NFLPA’s responsibility to the other ~98% of its members to somehow put a ceiling on just how much of the salary cap one player can account for?
    ————
    This is exactly what’s happened in the NBA. A big rush to give the superstars the entire salary cap. NFL teams won’t win doing this. It doesn’t matter much in the NBA, because that’s just entertainment. Anybody NFL team who thinks they can pay max money to Jackson and field a competitive team long term is foolish. Lamar depends on a lot to be successful.

  51. im truly sorry but i would seriously LMAO if snyder did that. i am laughing now just thinking about it.

  52. A team doesn’t necessarily have to give up two first round picks as the Ravens have basically now invited teams to offer trade proposals. And to the guy above that says this it tampering with a player under contract — once the non-exclusive tag is in place, the player is free to negotiate with other teams.

  53. Snyder committed bank fraud to get 50 million dollars to keep up appearances. He doesn’t have the money to Pay Jackson. I believe that is the only reason he might sell the team. He is cash poor

  54. This would be right in line with Snyderisms of the last 22 years. Let me go on record as a non-believer in LJ as a top-tier QB and that this site stating that they somehow know that he would be better than the unknown quantity that is Howell paints them as dim-witted.

  55. Well we all know the last thing anyone in the media wants to do is to give Dan Snyder credit for anything so regardless of what happens don’t expect that to happen

  56. I generally like Florio but this story is silly. As a longtime Washingtonian and fan (although not nearly what I once was), and can say definitely that attitudes towards Snyder are set under 10 feet of concrete. Bringing in Jackson isn’t changing anything in that regard. But he’s not bringing in LJ because he doesn’t have the cash to put into escrow that would be required. Now if a sale is completed sometime in the near future, maybe a new owner with the proper cashflow would make a run at Jackson, assuming, I hope, the football people are on board. But just stop with the theories about Snyder and Jackson and salvaging his reputation with fans. It’s not happening.

  57. pg33 says:
    March 9, 2023 at 2:54 pm
    Maybe they already discussed the Lamar option internally, and decided not to pursue him. Did anyone ever think of that ?
    ————
    Why announce it then? Wouldn’t said team be better saying nothing and let other teams bid thinking there’s more competition? Don’t tell me it’s to keep fans from getting excited.

    Is it be part of the NFLPA’s responsibility to the other ~98% of its members to somehow put a ceiling on just how much of the salary cap one player can account for?
    ————
    This is exactly what’s happened in the NBA. A big rush to give the superstars the entire salary cap. NFL teams won’t win doing this. It doesn’t matter much in the NBA, because that’s just entertainment. Anybody NFL team who thinks they can pay max money to Jackson and field a competitive team long term is foolish. Lamar depends on a lot to be successful
    ==========================================

    Not True. NBA superstars are underpaid. Its the middle class guys that are overpaid. The NFL is the league that is over paying its superstars who only play half the game. Jackson does more with less than anyone. His entire receiving core makes 10x less than Tyreek Hill. The amount of money these leagues make its all about power and the owners consistently inadvertently give it to players over time. With the NBA it was the demand for shorter contracts and it the NFL its getting rid of the middle class. Everything is cool until a few guys realize that they can pull a Carson Palmer if they are unhappy.

  58. Only a true Jackson apologist would compare poor, mommy-represented Lamar to Brock Purdy. The clown played chicken w/ the Ravens, and lost. He’s hurt too often, he ain’t worth 2 First rounders, and you have to build an offense around his reckless, can’t come back from a deficit, style. Owners saw how stupid Haslam was to give Watson guaranteed money. The owners wised up, poor Lamar didn’t.

  59. Lamar,… 70 games played,.. 4440 yds rushing avg 66 yds a game. Now try to tell me he’s NOT a running QB. He’s a salary cap risk from the standpoint he’s susceptible to more injuries than a prototypical pocket QB. I wouldn’t want to offer more than $40 – 45 mil/yr avg on a 4 or 5 year deal. But not fully guaranteed. Nope ! Phenomenal athlete though,…

  60. Tony Awesome says:
    March 9, 2023 at 4:39 pm
    Lamar,… 70 games played,.. 4440 yds rushing avg 66 yds a game. Now try to tell me he’s NOT a running QB. He’s a salary cap risk from the standpoint he’s susceptible to more injuries than a prototypical pocket QB. I wouldn’t want to offer more than $40 – 45 mil/yr avg on a 4 or 5 year deal. But not fully guaranteed. Nope ! Phenomenal athlete though

    ==================================

    Since LJ became starter in W11 of 2018 there have been 25 QBs with at least 50 dropbacks in 4th quarter, 1-score, 2-min situations

    Among the 25 QBs, LJ ranks
    No. 2 in QBR (100)
    No. 3 in Comp%
    12 in yards per pass attempts
    Second-most rush yards of ANY player in same situation

    Now tell me he is not also a great passing quarterback.

  61. No team “has to” make an offer to Lamar. It’s just insane to make a statement like that. Only way he gets an offer sheet is if he finally gives up on the guaranteed contract demand.

  62. mikecrabtreeschain says:
    March 9, 2023 at 4:53 pm
    Tony Awesome says:
    March 9, 2023 at 4:39 pm
    Lamar,… 70 games played,.. 4440 yds rushing avg 66 yds a game. Now try to tell me he’s NOT a running QB. He’s a salary cap risk from the standpoint he’s susceptible to more injuries than a prototypical pocket QB. I wouldn’t want to offer more than $40 – 45 mil/yr avg on a 4 or 5 year deal. But not fully guaranteed. Nope ! Phenomenal athlete though

    ==================================

    Since LJ became starter in W11 of 2018 there have been 25 QBs with at least 50 dropbacks in 4th quarter, 1-score, 2-min situations

    Among the 25 QBs, LJ ranks
    No. 2 in QBR (100)
    No. 3 in Comp%
    12 in yards per pass attempts
    Second-most rush yards of ANY player in same situation

    Now tell me he is not also a great passing quarterback

    ———

    He has only passed for over 3000 yards once. That stinks

  63. Not True. NBA superstars are underpaid. Its the middle class guys that are overpaid. The NFL is the league that is over paying its superstars who only play half the game. Jackson does more with less than anyone. His entire receiving core makes 10x less than Tyreek Hill. The amount of money these leagues make its all about power and the owners consistently inadvertently give it to players over time. With the NBA it was the demand for shorter contracts and it the NFL its getting rid of the middle class. Everything is cool until a few guys realize that they can pull a Carson Palmer if they are unhappy.
    ————-
    I fail to see the logic here. The NBA max/supermax deals have been a colossal failure for NBA teams. Like you said, guys get supermax deals and then they never play, never win the ring, and eventually get traded (sometimes the receiving team gets the picks). The only NFL comparable I can come up with is Brock Osweiler.

    The Ravens have the 2nd ranked offensive line, 3rd ranked defense, highly ranked special teams, elite TE, good HBs… but lesser WRs. No need to discuss why WRs don’t come to Baltimore. Lamar is very good at his thing. But it will only appeal to a handful of teams and I’ll bet none are willing to guarantee 100%.

  64. Seems very unlikely. Any team that acquires Lamar is going to have to build out a very specific style of offense that works for his skill set. The ravens build that out over the years. Really don’t see him going anywhere.

  65. I really don’t think any team will make a legitimate run at getting Jackson. What they’d have to give up is probably too high of a price and they’d have to end up dealing with the non-agent-agent situation. Not to mention dealing with the whole “100% garaunteed contract” conversations. Jackson is a certified star QB, but is feeling more and more like a certified pain to work with.

  66. Id love to see Jackson on the Raiders or Dolphins. A smart coach and some elite receivers will bring out his arm. I don’t care what anybody says, he has one of the best deep balls in the NFL.

  67. Jackson will sell tickets to a depressed fan base. Which the new owners will need to convince the local politicians to pony up for a new stadium. It’s a no brainer.

  68. pg33 says:
    March 9, 2023 at 5:49 pm
    Not True. NBA superstars are underpaid. Its the middle class guys that are overpaid. The NFL is the league that is over paying its superstars who only play half the game. Jackson does more with less than anyone. His entire receiving core makes 10x less than Tyreek Hill. The amount of money these leagues make its all about power and the owners consistently inadvertently give it to players over time. With the NBA it was the demand for shorter contracts and it the NFL its getting rid of the middle class. Everything is cool until a few guys realize that they can pull a Carson Palmer if they are unhappy.
    ————-
    I fail to see the logic here. The NBA max/supermax deals have been a colossal failure for NBA teams. Like you said, guys get supermax deals and then they never play, never win the ring, and eventually get traded (sometimes the receiving team gets the picks). The only NFL comparable I can come up with is Brock Osweiler.

    The Ravens have the 2nd ranked offensive line, 3rd ranked defense, highly ranked special teams, elite TE, good HBs… but lesser WRs. No need to discuss why WRs don’t come to Baltimore. Lamar is very good at his thing. But it will only appeal to a handful of teams and I’ll bet none are willing to guarantee 100%
    ================================
    ======

    There have been 9 supermax contracts in the NBA. 2 Have won rings. And only 4 have been traded and and zero have had picks attached. And nearly every NBA championship team has max players on its roster.

    As for Jackson you conviently left out the fact that same place that graded the Ravens offensive line as 2nd best in the NFL also graded Jackson as the 5th best QB. The wide receivers are among the worst in NFL history. The starting running back has missed 26 games the two seasons and only had 35 carries in two seasons on the field with Jackson. The defense got torched and blew 5 4th quarter leads in the 4 games that Jackson lost this season. The reason the Ravens didn’t acquire a top notch wide receiver is they don’t want to pay for one. Aj Brown, Diggs, Tyreek Hill, and Davante Adams all went to places with bad QBs before they showed up because they all got huge contract extensions. The owners might collude against giving a fully guaranteed contract but they should. Whenever a Rooney Rule story comes out I hear how much owners don’t care about anything but winning and yet they don’t want to pay for a one man offense that wins 75% of the time.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.