Report: NFL lacks the votes to push Daniel Snyder out

NFL: AUG 25 Preseason - Chiefs at Bears
Getty Images

As the NFL’s owners prepare to take a trip to Arizona for the annual meetings, there’s a question as to whether enough votes exist to send Daniel Snyder on a trip to Belize.

According to Josh Kosman of the New York Post, the league currently lacks the requisite 24 “aye” votes to force Snyder to sell.

The details are thin, and it’s hard to know how 32 owners currently feel about the situation — unless the source has polled each of them and gotten a truthful answer.

From the moment the NFL clumsily, but obviously, hid the results of the Beth Wilkinson investigation, it became obvious that the league was protecting Snyder. And it’s surely not happening because he’s beloved by his brethren. Whether they don’t want to create a precedent that would potentially apply to them or they fear scorched-earth litigation that would expose their own potential entanglements or whether some of them like having a cluster of dysfunctional owners anchoring the dregs of the league, they’ve been treating Mr. Snyder with kid gloves.

Except for Jim Irsay. Although he doesn’t have the juice to lead his colleagues toward flipping from no to yes, he has the ability (as we saw in October) to say enough things to get the fans and media to grab torches and pitchforks.

Snyder’s announcement regarding his apparently willingness to sell took steam out of a situation that was approaching critical mass. The lingering question is whether he’s truly serious about selling, or whether he’s simply trying to run out the clock.

If the latest report is accurate, the simple truth could be that the clock isn’t even ticking.

56 responses to “Report: NFL lacks the votes to push Daniel Snyder out

  1. Stories are no longer than news so the NFL has essentially dodged bullet and will be able to walk away from this unscathed

  2. Sounds like it’s true Danny has dirt on a lot of them. And no one is surprised there was dirt to find…

  3. I’m telling you he has dirt on the commissioner. Topple Goodell and Snyder will fall along with a handful of other scumbags. Until you go after Goodell you just aren’t serious.

  4. Or, before going nuclear, behind the scenes the owners are pressuring him to sell voluntarily.

    That is good for everyone involved. NFL doesn’t air dirty laundry, Snyder gets top dollar because it isn’t a forced fire sale, and values of franchises continue to escalate.

  5. There are a number of owners with baggage and skeletons in the closet. They don’t wanna put themselves on that slippery slope.

  6. This is the league that all of you are so fixated on. It’s just a bunch of rich guys getting richer and laughing all the way to the bank.

  7. This is nothing but an argument centered around party lines. Irsay is a raging liberal and Snyder is the raging right. They don’t like each other and Irsay wants him gone. That’s what liberals do. Irsay should not be casting stones at anyone considering his checkered past. The NFL should vote him out if they vote Snyder out. As for Snyder, whatever he has done should be prosecuted in a court of law. The precedent of stripping people of their possessions just because you think they are a scumbag is a slippery slope.

  8. If he had dirt on Goodell…Goodell wouldn’t keep getting raises after his contract is up.He more than likely has dirt on the other owners.I would seriously laugh if Snyder ends up not selling the team

  9. Regardless of how they feel about Snyder, an owner doesn’t want to be part of a precedent used that could eventually be used against them.

  10. I will never understand the type of person who sticks around when they are no longer wanted. Maybe it’s the money – but how much is enough? You can only buy so many lifts for your shoes.

  11. It would be very foolish for the owners to allow anyone to bully them in to any action. Snyder gave in on the naming issue. He got no credit for it. They won’t ever publicly force another owner to do anything. Nor should they quite frankly.

  12. I read the original post article. The source for this was “one person who was familiar with one of the NFL owners.”

    Following the news on the Commanders sale — or lack thereof — should be a lesson in media/information literacy. As you intimate here, it’s hard to verify the veracity of this claim and many will just read the headline and take it all as fact.

    Bottom line the truth will come out through actions movibg forward.

  13. They took Snyder’s team away when he was made to change the name.I’m sure he wants to sell and the other owners don’t want to disrupt the process.It would cost Snyder a billion or two in the sale price if they voted him out now.

  14. one of the challenges is, sometimes the devil you know, is better than the Devil you don’t. There aren’t a lot of people who can afford to own an NFL franchise. And let’s face it, Danny is fielding a non competitive team. Why mess with the status quo – especially if the new owner has the means to make them successful. Remember, only one team can with the Super Bowl. The odds are better for other teams with Danny at the helm.

  15. I agree with all of the above things about BADdell. As a Bears fan, I do not really care about WFT ownership but I will say I would take Snyder as an owner over Haslam in Cleveland any day!!!

  16. Dan Snyder, new hero of the paranoid right. YOU can all blame the corperate agenda while supporting a guy who is a grifter. Snyder should start doing media, he could president at this rate.

  17. Grew up in the DC suburbs in the 80’s, the Redskins were practically a cult following…it’s appalling how far this franchise has fallen. So glad I moved to Baltimore 35 years ago and became a Ravens fan.

  18. If you’re saying men like Eddie DeBartolo and Jerry Richardson weren’t forced out, I’ll have to ask to sell crazy somewhere else.

  19. proraven says:
    March 11, 2023 at 10:23 am
    So glad I moved to Baltimore 35 years ago and became a Ravens fan.
    ——

    But the Ravens have only been in Baltimore for 27 years..

  20. The media narrative surrounding Snyder is different than reality and Irsay is a drunken crackpot. Note the number of controversies the last few years with the cowboys and jeery Jones….why isn’t he being taken out behind the woodshed?

  21. As so many expected, tough talk is meaningless. Owners will regret allowing themselves to be herded, as the next time the owner under pressure will know his fellow owners will melt. And forcing him to sell would not affect their own franchise value, his sale would be considered an outlier, like Watson’s contract.

    But nothing new here.

  22. Snyder can sell if he wants to. I offered $2,500 and an almost new 1988 Camry, (with only 347,000 miles) and he turned me down. So unless he is convicted in court, the fact that others don’t like him is no reason to force a sale. Unless of course it is to me.

  23. As terrible a person as Snyder may well be, and he probably is, it’s sets a horrific precedent to remove him. As a Raider fan it was obvious he completely sabotaged my team and ruined Jon Gruden in an attempt to deflect attention off his situation. If Snyder was removed for true reasons, the emails, ruining another team (as if Raiders needed help), then it would be acceptable. However, he would be removed for politically correct reasons and quite possibly be forced to sell to an individual or group that is far, far worse. There is so much evil with the ultra rich today. Men like Bill Gates, Zuckerberg etc. similar types would completely ruin the NFL.

  24. It’s a free country and we’re all Americans. Why are we always searching for the enemy within? I understand when politicians create a boogie man to scare people into handing over their wallets, but we’re better off sticking together. Otherwise, we’ll all be in jail one day.

  25. I said months ago that once a certain party in DC was out of power, the clock was done. It stopped in November 2022. The “fans” whomever they are and sports media which had another great week with Kendrick Perkins looking like a fool, do not have the sustained power to do anything but whine about it.

  26. If I’m in the Commanders Division I want Snyder to own the team as long as possible. They will never win a Super Bowl with Snyder pulling the strings.

  27. Turns out the people who value obscene wealth are themselves obscenely wealthy.

    What a coincidence!

  28. What, specifically, did Dan Snyder do again? He might be a terrible owner but what did he do, or not, that makes you want to ‘cancel’ him? We are living in the era of the woke witch-hunts. It’s got to stop. This stuff is no different than the witch-hunts during 1950’s McCarthyism or the the Salem witch hunts when the good people accused 200 of their neighbors of witchcraft, found 30 guilty, and executed 19. Same stuff here. Same type of people.

  29. Weird how so many want to take away something he built. Bad guy or not, it’s his business. I’m glad the media lost.

  30. Why is the general NFL fan so worried about if Daniel Snyder owns the team or not! I could care less!I just watch the games! I’m not a fan of Jerry Jones or Irsay, or Haslem, or quite a few others for that matter! Why is there the need to have him removed? Did he kill someone?

  31. number1 says:
    March 11, 2023 at 12:15 pm
    What, specifically, did Dan Snyder do again? He might be a terrible owner but what did he do, or not, that makes you want to ‘cancel’ him?
    ___________

    He stole money from his fellow owners. He sexually assaulted a Redskins cheerleader. He allowed his buddies to secretly watch the cheerleaders change clothes. Shall I go on?

  32. Because they know it’s a terrible precedent to set and a few of them might be looked at next. History has shown that power is never used only once and that power is often used for the sake of using power.

  33. I think the ONLY reason he’s not being forced to sell this minute is because the broncos just sold. The NFL likes to see each franchise sell for top of the market value with nice growth between sales. The broncos sale creates a very recent comp and it means someone with top dollar isn’t available to bid because they just bought a team

  34. springfield says:
    March 11, 2023 at 12:27 pm
    Weird how so many want to take away something he built. Bad guy or not, it’s his business. I’m glad the media lost.
    _________

    He did not build anything. He bought an iconic franchise and ran it into the ground.

  35. Good for him!! Goodell is a snake and a crook he 100% has the dirt on him and other guys like Jerruh. He should now say he’s going back to the Redskins and everybody would love it.

  36. It seems strange. His misconduct, workplace mismanagement, team mismanagement and financial improprieties seem far worse than what has prompted other owners to be forced out before.

  37. Other than the money profited what possible enjoyment could Daniel Snyder derive from owning the WFT. The team isn’t going anywhere. Has little chance of making a deep run in the playoffs. The stadium is routinely voted one of worst in the league. Snyder is a businessman and the $6-7 billion he receives he could put into any number of new ventures. Maybe one of those will be successful and he could earn praise in the business world and turn his whole narrative around. Right now he has no allies in the league or from his fanbase.

  38. Jim Irsay? Please. His own checkered past hardly makes him an ideal face for the “dump Snyder” movement.

  39. Jerry Jones still has command of the NFL. He is friends with Snyer. As long as he supports Snyder who claims to have dirt on good ole boy Jerry. It’ll be a while before those 24 voters are gathered to oust Snyder.

  40. Tom Brady says:
    March 11, 2023 at 9:38 am
    I’m telling you he has dirt on the commissioner. Topple Goodell and Snyder will fall along with a handful of other scumbags. Until you go after Goodell you just aren’t serious.

    ———————————

    Dirt on the commissioner is by default all of their dirt, so Snyder can get a ot of sway if he has that.

  41. The other three teams in his division probably want him to stay to assure his team’s continued dysfunction.

  42. number1 says:
    March 11, 2023 at 12:15 pm
    What, specifically, did Dan Snyder do again? He might be a terrible owner but what did he do, or not, that makes you want to ‘cancel’ him? We are living in the era of the woke witch-hunts. It’s got to stop. This stuff is no different than the witch-hunts during 1950’s McCarthyism or the the Salem witch hunts when the good people accused 200 of their neighbors of witchcraft, found 30 guilty, and executed 19. Same stuff here. Same type of people.
    ******************************************************************************************
    You must really be upset with that woke Florida governor who’s cancelling Disney World and cancelling whatever books in schools that he opposes. I’m sure they’ll be burning witches in Florida soon. Oh, the wokeness.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.