Chargers propose playoff seeding change that could let wild card teams host division champs

AFC Wild Card Playoffs - Dallas Cowboys v Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Getty Images

Under current NFL rules, division winners will always host wild card teams in the playoffs. Under a proposed rule change by the Chargers, that would not necessarily be the case.

The Chargers have proposed a change to the NFL bylaws that would seed wild card teams higher than division winners in the playoffs if the division winner had a losing record and the wild card team had at least four more wins than the division winner.

That would have come into play last year, when the 8-9 Buccaneers won the NFC South and got the 4 seed, while the 12-5 Cowboys were a wild card team and got the 5 seed. When the two teams met in the playoffs, it was at Tampa Bay. Under the Chargers’ proposal, the Cowboys would have been the 4 seed, the Buccaneers the 5 seed, and the playoff game would have been in Dallas.

The Chargers themselves lost on the road in the playoffs to a team that had a better record than them, although that situation wouldn’t change under the Chargers’ new proposal. Last year the 10-7 wild card Chargers played on the road at the 9-8 division champion Jaguars, and that would still be the case in the future if this proposal is adopted. Still, it’s easy to see why the Chargers think this proposal could benefit them in future years: As long as the Chiefs have Patrick Mahomes, the AFC West is going to be a tough division to win, and the Chargers may find themselves a wild card team a lot in the years ahead.

All 32 NFL teams will consider the Chargers’ proposal, and they will need 24 teams to vote in favor of it for the rule to change.

40 responses to “Chargers propose playoff seeding change that could let wild card teams host division champs

  1. Makes sense the Chargers would push for this with the Chiefs in their division. That said, I like this proposal. Enough with teams with a losing records getting rewarded with a home game.

  2. That’s rich. 90 percent of the Chargers home games are seated by visiting team’s fans.

  3. I would make it simpler than that. Teams with losing records can’t host playoff games. Period.

  4. The Chargers have accepted they’ll never win the division as long as Mahomes is in Kansas City.

  5. The Chargers also proposed a rule that if a team is up by 27 then the game ends.

  6. This is such a Chargers thing to push for. Striving for 2nd for years to come

  7. Chargers were 2-4 in their division last year maybe just do better if you don’t like going on the road and losing to a 9 win team. This rule is awful I’m done watching if it passes which I think eventually down the road it will.

  8. How about play off seeding based on wins and loses period. That division wasn’t good enough this year so none of them get in .

  9. Just eliminate wild card teams altogether and they will never have this problem again!

  10. Playoff teams should be seeded by their season record, regardless of division. Good teams have been screwed over by the current system. Leet the best teams compete in the playoffs.

  11. If you’re gonna start doing all kinds of mixing and matching, then just get rid of divisions & rack ’em and stack em. You should get some sort of advantage, if you win your division, if you’re going to have divisions. Nobody guessed the NFC East would be the best NFC division last year. It can change every year. Otherwise, just leave it alone.

  12. Totally disagree. You should be rewarded for winning the division. If you aren’t the best team in your division, you deserve to travel.

  13. This is the Chargers’ best hope to get a home playoff game, since they know they’ll never win the division as song as Mahomes is in KC.

  14. Just leave it alone. The 7 team playoff is bad enough. It was perfect with 6 teams.

  15. Just get rid of divisions then. Top 7 in each conference go to the playoffs. I know we’ll all miss Titans-Texas twice a year, but it’s a small price to pay to ensure the teams that deserve to make the playoffs get in, the teams that don’t stay out, and the best teams get home playoff games.

  16. Last year, because of division rotation, the Dallas Cowboys, along with every other team in the NFC East, played the NFC North and the AFC South. Those two divisions had a combined record of 56-78 (.417).

    Last year, because of division rotation, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, along with every other team in the NFC South, played the NFC West and the AFC North. Those two divisions had a combined record of 69-66 (.511).

    Who you play matters. There is a reason that division winners are given a home playoff game.

  17. Way too many divisions. Reduce by 1/2. (2) divisions in each Conference. Then each division winner can get a well earned bye week going into the playoffs and thus the division winner really means something. (2) division winners and 4 wild card teams in each Conference. Each team plays every team in its division once, not twice. Home field rotational as in college divisions.

  18. I guess the 27-point blown lead in the playoffs would have looked better at home….

  19. Just seat them one through eight. Have at her. Just like every round robin tourny going. The best teams will still meet up in the championship round and the the Super Bowl.

  20. Now would be a great time to float another change to The Kansas City Situation in the NFL.

    All officials must leave the field of play at the two minute warning of both halves. No penalty flags shall be thrown and no penalties will be assessed.

    Just let anything go on field between the two opponents.

    We can’t be calling penalties during end of game scenarios anymore. That’s so 1970s anyway.

  21. Don’t be that team, Chargers. It’s fine the way it is. Will we only appreciate how perfect the division-centered approach to this game is after it’s been swept away?

  22. “The Chargers have proposed a change to the NFL bylaws that would seed wild card teams higher than division winners in the playoffs if the division winner had a losing record and the wild card team had at least four more wins than the division winner.”

    This proposal is doomed, simply because it involves a “IF X AND Y THEN Z” condition. That is far too complicated for most people to understand. Things that can’t be consumed off your phone screen while driving are just too complex to deal with, it seems these days.

    If you doubt this, look at the discussions here, on TV, and on radio about playoff seeding. People are completely flummoxed how a 9-7-1 team can outrank a 9-8 team.

  23. gmjoe says:
    March 13, 2023 at 7:34 pm
    How about play off seeding based on wins and loses period. That division wasn’t good enough this year so none of them get in .
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————-
    The problem with that line of thinking is that the teams from different divisions have vastly different schedules. When a Wildcard has a better record than a Division winner, maybe it is a better team or maybe it had a better record due to a much easier schedule.

  24. Terrible idea. It would cheapen both traditional rivalries and the regular season. Why not just get rid of divisions and conferences altogether. How far would it go?

    Want to win it all? Win your division first and hopefully get a home game.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.