Rule change could make failed fourth downs reviewable by the booth, not coach’s challenge

Pittsburgh Steelers v Baltimore Ravens
Getty Images

The Texans are proposing a new NFL rule that would add failed fourth downs to the list of plays that can only be reviewed by the replay assistant, and not by a coach’s challenge.

Currently replays are initiated from the booth on turnovers, scoring plays, in overtime and in the last two minutes of either half.

If the NFL adopts the Texans’ proposal an offensive team that goes for it on fourth down and is ruled short of the yard to gain would not be able to throw its challenge flag to have the play reviewed. Instead, the replay assistant in the stadium or the league’s officiating office would determine whether the play was close enough to call for a replay review.

According to the Texans’ proposal, the reason the team is proposing the play is “Competitive equity and pace of play.”

Like all rule changes, the Texans’ proposal would require a three-fourths majority of the league, or 24 teams, to vote in favor of it in order to be adopted.

18 responses to “Rule change could make failed fourth downs reviewable by the booth, not coach’s challenge

  1. Meaning they expand the rule to include another situation that is crucial to the outcome of games, makes sense

  2. I mean technically it’s a turnover on downs so it should automatically be reviewed like scoring plays and turnovers

  3. I’ve never understood why failed touchdowns aren’t reviewable by the booth. Scoring plays are reviewed by the booth but if the refs screw up and fail to call a touchdown a touchdown, then it’s up to the coach to challenge. A touchdown that is short of goal line or ruled incomplete or whatever should be automatically reviewed by the booth. Especially if this 4th down rule would pass. Would be odd that a 4th down that is short is automatically reviewed on a drive where a touchdown that is short is not automatically reviewed by booth.

  4. At this point just have a “replay ref” present on site to immediately watch all plays on screen and immediately inform field officials when a call went wrong. It’s faster, more efficient and will probably lead to less controversy

  5. The real rule change needed is a booth review when the ref says it is not a TD. Ref says TD automatically they review to see if it is correct but when they rule no TD ….on to the next play.

  6. Freakin tennis can track balls flying 150 mph and spot whether the ball is in or out of a 2 inch line down to a fraction of a millimeter…..NFL still has 75 year old guys and a chain

  7. All rule changes are made with one thing in mind: cheat the Patriots.

  8. drinkblatz says:
    March 15, 2023 at 7:12 am
    I’ve never understood why failed touchdowns aren’t reviewable by the booth. Scoring plays are reviewed by the booth but if the refs screw up and fail to call a touchdown a touchdown, then it’s up to the coach to challenge. A touchdown that is short of goal line or ruled incomplete or whatever should be automatically reviewed by the booth. Especially if this 4th down rule would pass. Would be odd that a 4th down that is short is automatically reviewed on a drive where a touchdown that is short is not automatically reviewed by booth.
    ———
    It actually wouldn’t be odd and your not looking at the big picture and pace of play. The majority of plays near the goal line are borderline calls so what your saying is with a 1st and goal let’s say on the 2, if they run the ball its likely every down would be reviewed as they become borderline. So instead if adding maybe 1 or 2 replays your seemingly adding 5 plus almost every game

  9. If something is bad enough a coach wants to risk a challenge even knowing it supposedly was already looked at once, why prohibit that? So, if it’s clear they blew the review, or you can’t really tell if they chose to review it, there’s zero ability for the coach to make anybody take another look? Raise your hand if you see this eventually causing a controversy.

  10. Interesting. But does that mean future by the offense to get a first down or failure by the defense to stop the offense from getting a first down. Both sides potentially have an argument, which makes this ripe for unintended consequences for this rule change.

  11. This is stupid. Should the replay ref just review every play, because every play has the potential to be pivotal? How about if a team comes up short on a 3rd and 1 and as a result has to punt? Potentially pivotal. OTOH, the NFL ref quality has gone straight into the dumpster in the past few seasons. I’m not implying that legalized gambling has anything to do with it, but I’m not implying it doesn’t, either. Players get paid enough that they’re probably bribe-proof. Not so refs.

  12. I wish we could get away from having replay altogether and let the referees call the game, for better or for worse. An occasional bad call would be better than the forensic analysis of replay we do every Sunday to figure out if the ball might have moved slightly when the player went to the ground.

  13. Allow the coaches to challenge ANY play. With only 2 challenges, 3 if they get the first 2 correct. Penalties, no calls, etc. If there is a missed holding call, the replay should fix that. Judgement calls (PI) can be challenged with the likelihood they won’t be overturned but if the coach wants to risk it, let them.

  14. So, what happens on a 4th down play that is ruled successful, but shouldn’t have been? Will they review those, or only, as stated, the failed 4th down attempts?

  15. cbwv1974 says:
    March 15, 2023 at 8:55 am
    Freakin tennis can track balls flying 150 mph and spot whether the ball is in or out of a 2 inch line down to a fraction of a millimeter…..NFL still has 75 year old guys and a chain

    ————————-

    The tennis argument is kinda silly. The ball is captured by a camera. It’s not a ball that’s oblong, that is obscured by 300 pound men. If you do a chip, how does the chip know when the knee is down? How does the chip know if there was movement before or after the player is down?

    I agree, there’s a better way, but tennis isn’t really a comp.

  16. With sports gambling running wild in America, EVERY PLAY SHOULD BE REVIEWABLE. Just get it right !

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.