Josh Jacobs, Tony Pollard, Saquon Barkley might be wise to accept franchise tenders

Kansas City Chiefs v Las Vegas Raiders
Getty Images

In a text discussion with the PFT staff regarding our recent item about Austin Ekeler‘s valid (but ultimately futile) complaints regarding the running back market, MDS made an observation that I saw fit to steal.

The three running backs currently operating under the franchise tag might be wise to accept their tenders.

Raiders running back Josh Jacobs, Cowboys running back Tony Pollard, and Giants running back Saquon Barkley each have one-year, $10.1 million offers. They become fully guaranteed if/when accepted.

Until they’re accepted, they can be rescinded, making the player a free agent.

If Jacobs and/or Pollard and/or Barkley suddenly become free agents, what would happen? When the top of the 2023 free-agent market at the position is $$6.25 million per year, would someone offer $10 million or more?

What if the Cowboys decide to cut the cord on Pollard and trade for Derrick Henry? He’s due to make $10.5 million this year. (That said, he’s likely looking for a new deal.)

For all three of these players — Jacobs, Pollard, and Barkley — it makes sense to seriously consider taking the bird in the hand. Unless and until they do, any of them could end up foraging for roughly half a bird in the bush.

28 responses to “Josh Jacobs, Tony Pollard, Saquon Barkley might be wise to accept franchise tenders

  1. Saquon wishing he had taken the Giants offer for 3 and 36. Don’t know if it was ego or bad advice from his agent, but he’s not seeing that again.

  2. RBs are in for a rude awakening. Their careers are short and only the truly elite are difference makers. Heck, even the elite are not sure things for long. Ask any fantasy football player. RBs should see their pay decrease as GMs get wise to the fact that it’s an easy spot to save on salary.

    Stud WR + Average RB > Average WR + Stud RB

  3. I don’t even know who the Chiefs primary running back is, and I actually went to the Super Bowl. Who was the Rams primary back last year? I don’t recall either. And so forth.

  4. mcdeez22 says:
    March 22, 2023 at 8:43 pm
    RBs are in for a rude awakening. Their careers are short and only the truly elite are difference makers. Heck, even the elite are not sure things for long. Ask any fantasy football player. RBs should see their pay decrease as GMs get wise to the fact that it’s an easy spot to save on salary.
    _________________

    Sure, fantasy football players are much more ahead of trends than professional football GMs.

  5. Honestly, D Henry is the only one I could even imagine paying more than a few million a season.

    Dude is just on a completely different level than other RBs in the league.

  6. In Jacobs’ case there is no state income tax in Nevada.. If his offer were to be rescinded and let’s say he got that top of the market rate of $6.25m from another team .. there’s a high likelihood a good percentage of that would be clipped off the top.

  7. The only way for these RB to get paid big money is to become one year mercenaries for teams.willing to pay for 1-year deals at 10 mil per year. There are two problems with this. First, they have to make it through the franchise tag year. Second, they have to play RB. Which means they’ll be lucky to make it through the franchise year healthy AND productive. Teams know the deck is stacked against these RBs and fresh meat is coming out of the draft every year…on the CHEAP!

  8. GMs have wised up. You can put a 3rd round RB behind a 1st and 2nd round OL and get great returns for less cash. Of the RBs in the league right now, only like 5 are worth more than $5m a year

  9. The fact is good OL good running game. Can you block catch out the back field there’s value there. Just seems that position is easier to plug and play. Heck they aren’t even getting drafted that high anymore.

  10. They’re probably getting their advice from Lamars mom. She’s telling them to stand fast

  11. gibson45 says:
    March 22, 2023 at 8:55 pm
    mcdeez22 says:
    March 22, 2023 at 8:43 pm
    RBs are in for a rude awakening. Their careers are short and only the truly elite are difference makers. Heck, even the elite are not sure things for long. Ask any fantasy football player. RBs should see their pay decrease as GMs get wise to the fact that it’s an easy spot to save on salary.
    _________________

    Sure, fantasy football players are much more ahead of trends than professional football GMs.

    ———

    Nah, you’re not hearing me. Fantasy football players were wrong too. I’m a guy who drafted Jonathan Taylor #1 last year. We’re all learning together. If you want to dispute my actual point that RBs are overpaid and committing to them for long term big money contracts makes zero sense, go ahead.

  12. It’s just supply and demand. The *function* of a RB is extremely valuable to a team, but the guys doing it are so commonplace that individual RBs aren’t cost-effective to invest in. There’s not much reason the market *should* value players who are easily replaceable and who don’t last as long.

    The draft tells the tale. Almost all RBs are drafted outside the first round. Even TEs are starting to pile into the first round. That says that most teams don’t expect to need to keep a RB even to their 5th year, let alone sign another contract with them.

    If it’s determined that there is really a disproportionate impact on their career value compared to all other positions (all, not just some), one option would be to shorten the rookie RB contract by a year. That’s a calculated risk, though, and those who benefit could be offset by those who just get dumped a year early.

  13. Jacobs was excellent last season, but I’d be surprised if he gets an offer anywhere close to his one year rental.

  14. mcdeez22 says:
    March 22, 2023 at 8:43 pm

    RBs are in for a rude awakening. Their careers are short and only the truly elite are difference makers. Heck, even the elite are not sure things for long. Ask any fantasy football player. RBs should see their pay decrease as GMs get wise to the fact that it’s an easy spot to save on salary.

    Stud WR + Average RB > Average WR + Stud
    ________________

    Actually, RBd are very valuable in FF because there are so few top backs who get a lot of carries. In the past, teams that had guys like Gurley or Henry won their leagues a pretty good amount of time.

  15. “RBs are in for a rude awakening. Their careers are short and only the truly elite are difference makers”

    They already know this. Which is why they have to push for the most amount of money possible early in their career.

  16. I believe that the Giants can tag Saquon next year, too. Probably for around $11m.look If he was offered 3 years at 36 million, that ship has sailed.

  17. Thinking this year is the turning point for NFL players to truly question the direction the NFLPA has taken them. Fa has been underwhelming at best for the majority of players. Plenty of stories of players turning down offers from their own teams on the advice of their agents who are being influenced by the NFLPA only to end up signing elsewhere for less money. Look no further then Lamar Jackson as the prime example of how the leadership has failed the players. Having him lose huge sums of money in a desperate attempt to make guaranteed contracts a reality is ridiculous. Time for the players to take control of their union and elect leadership that has the best interest of all the players in mind not just the QBs and a handful of other elite players. Here’s a glaring example of how the NFLPA has failed the players. The minimum salary for a player with at least 3 yrs is $1.08 million. For a player with at least 7 yrs is goes up to a whopping $1.165 million. Considering the average length of a NFL career is 3.3 years this just shows how bad the current CBA truly is.

  18. Everyone here said Barkley should have taken the Giants deal. Not sure why his agent could’t see it. RBs get one FA contract to cash in. Now he will get kicker money.

  19. I would have to put money down on each of the above teams are going to draft a replacement RB this year and cut these guys loose in 2024.

    RB with zero NFL carries >+++ RB with 6 years of NFL carries

  20. Please hold out – I want to hear the orchestra and choir play as you all join together in a chorus of disrespected feelings!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.