Report of Commanders’ interest in Andrew Luck first surfaced last year

Chicago Bears v Indianapolis Colts
Getty Images

Much isn’t known about whether the Commanders tampered with retired Colts quarterback Andrew Luck. Here’s one thing we now know.

It’s not new.

Nearly 14 months before John Keim of ESPN.com buried a Luck nugget in an article under an unrelated headline, Keim . . . buried a Luck nugget in an article under an unrelated headline.

March 19, 2022. “How Joe Gibbs, film study and analytics led the Washington Commanders to Carson Wentz.” Fifteenth paragraph: “At one point [the Commanders] even wondered: Would Andrew Luck, the retired former Colt, want to play again? That went nowhere.”

It still doesn’t nail down whether the Commanders contacted the Colts or Luck. However, it’s worded in a way that implies they went straight to Luck.

The first time around, Colts owner Jim Irsay didn’t notice — or he didn’t care. This time around, Irsay sees the potential benefit for nailing a team for tampering, given the way the league handled the Jonathan Gannon tampering situation.

This time around, Irsay and the Colts have demanded an investigation. It will be very interesting to see what happens. Or what doesn’t happen.

22 responses to “Report of Commanders’ interest in Andrew Luck first surfaced last year

  1. Battle for worst owner in NFL now that Snyder is gone – Jim Irsay vs. Michael Bidwill

  2. The Colts really have some nerve going after the commanders for tampering when they not only ran but were the ring-leaders of the “Suck for Luck” campaign. Maybe they should clean up their own back yard first. It’s a tell-tale sign of a poorly ran organization. The only conclusion that I can come up with as to why Irsay is even pursuing this in the first place must be sour grapes over the Wentz trade debacle.

  3. What’s her name will come out with a derailed 209 page report that will never see the light of day.

  4. Will The Washington Commanders build their new stadium on the old RFK stadium site with a entertainment complex?

  5. Mark Maske of the Washington Post has reported that they didn’t contact Luck directly and other GMs around the league are siding with Washington on this. Irsay is the new Dan Snyder.

  6. It’s ok to tank for a player, yet not ok to discuss a guy who retired 4 years ago??

  7. Everything should be investigated just as everything should be litigated. The lure of ‘something for nothing’ is irresistible.

  8. Are we going to have some huge investigation over what at most will result in a text message or a phone call to a retired player.

    It’s so stupid and such a waste of money.

  9. So nobody from any other NFL team can say hello to Luck, who hasn’t played in years? Does this last until his death?

  10. The Colts seem to enjoy making something out of nothing, but I guess if you aren’t any good at winning you need to find something to do with your time

  11. Battle for worst owner in NFL now that Snyder is gone – Jim Irsay vs. Michael Bidwill
    ============

    Spanos. Its not even close.

    He’s paying RENT

  12. Let’s say Luck DID want to come back. Surely, it’d be a for short-term and he’d want it to be with a contender. Like he’d be a good target for somebody on the cusp who just needed a QB or maybe just had their starter get hurt. Washington checks none of those boxes and even if they did get Luck for a couple seasons they still wouldn’t be a contender. It’d be a total waste for them in the big-picture.

  13. Luck sources said they never contacted him. Jim Irsay, why didn’t you just call and ask luck yourself????

    Hmmm

  14. This is one of those outdated rules that needs to go. This is a mockery of the tampering rules for guys that are retired and out of contract

  15. Jim Irsay has been a clown for a long while, but he is in the right here. Why not try and get something for your team out of it? He was also keen to bait Tennessee into trading up and take Lewis. And his frank comments on Dan Snyder were good to see, rather than the owners covering each others’ backs no matter what. Irsay is doing well lately in my opinion.

  16. wickedawesome says:
    May 9, 2023 at 11:24 am
    Jim Irsay has been a clown for a long while, but he is in the right here. Why not try and get something for your team out of it? He was also keen to bait Tennessee into trading up and take Lewis. And his frank comments on Dan Snyder were good to see, rather than the owners covering each others’ backs no matter what. Irsay is doing well lately in my opinion.

    ————–

    I agree he’s doing pretty well, but the tamper rule is generally terrible and it’s even worse in this case. It actually doesn’t stop any tampering and it only catches careless fools and gets them fined.

    Most smart teams probably do the recruiting via one of their trusted players and it is no longer tampering.

    Generally, I don’t see why teams need to collude to avoid recruiting each others players. That’s what contracts are for. In the real world this stuff happens all the time. Not sure why the NFL has to protect against it.

  17. Irsay is one of the worst clown owners for sure now that Danny boy is leaving. Go hang another banner.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.