Matt Araiza, alleged victim disagree strongly on impact of prosecutor’s comments

Getty Images

Much has been made about comments made by prosecutors to the alleged victim in the incident involving former Bills punter Matt Araiza. The alleged victim makes very little of the conclusion that charges ultimately weren’t filed due to evidence supporting a conclusion that Araiza was not present when an alleged gang rape occurred.

USA Today spoke separately with Araiza and the alleged victim. They sharply disagree on the impact of the 101-minute recorded meeting between prosecutors, the alleged victim, and her lawyer.

Per the new article, Araiza and his agent, Joe Linta, have sent the audio to roughly 20 teams, in an effort to get Araiza another opportunity in the NFL.

“I know the teams know the true facts,” Araiza told USA Today. “They’ve heard the audio. They know this isn’t true. It’s that we need the public to understand as well. Because I think teams have a fear that if they sign me, there will be a little bit of backlash because the public has been told things that aren’t true.”

One way to help reduce the backlash perhaps could be to make the audio available for public consumption. It Araiza and Linta are able to give it to roughly 20 teams, they also can release it for media to review, analyze, and/or scrutinize.

The reaction to the tape might not be universal.

“I don’t think it exonerates anybody,” the alleged victim told USA Today.

Per USA Today, the recording refers to “nine brief video clips of the woman’s sexual encounters” on the night in question. Araiza claims the recording is “huge.”

The alleged victim claims that she was too intoxicated to consent to sexual activity, and that the video clips, “show only a fraction” of what transpired. She said the video accounts for roughly 30 seconds of events that lasted more than 90 minutes.

“I just don’t think that’s fair at all to look at these short clips that were already way into this assault already happening and make a judgment on that and say that that was consensual,” she told USA Today.

Araiza admitted to having sex with the woman outside the house where the gang rape allegedly occurred. In the lawsuit, the alleged victim claims Araiza led her inside and threw her down on a bed.

“He should face accountability for what he did and what he admitted to doing,” the alleged victim said. “It was wrong. I was 17 and I was drunk, regardless of whether the DA was able to prove. It was wrong.”

Despite her age, the prosecutor told the alleged victim that it could not be proven Araiza and the others accused of having sex with her that they knew she was younger than 18. In California, it is a defense to statutory rape if the accused reasonably believed the alleged victim was at least 18.

“I didn’t say my age at all and nobody asked me,” the alleged victim told USA Today. “Matt didn’t ask me. None of the guys asked me. Nobody at the party asked me, so I just wasn’t prompted and I didn’t answer.”

Ultimately, prosecutors don’t like to take to trial cases that they believe can’t be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That very high bar, which was prominently on display in the O.J. Simpson case, regularly influences the exercise of prosecutorial discretion.

It was a factor last year with the Deshaun Watson cases. The prosecutor admitted that she ultimately deferred to other vehicles for the victims securing justice, including their civil lawsuits.

In this case, the civil lawsuit against Araiza will continue. As we previously have explained, there’s no NFL rule or policy that would result in discipline or paid leave, given that he will not be charged criminally — regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit.

It’s now for the teams to balance the significance of the punting position and how well Araiza can be expected to perform it at the NFL level against the potential consequences of giving him a roster spot. It’s a matter of assessing the benefits from a football standpoint versus the costs from a P.R. perspective.

Whether that’s right or wrong doesn’t matter. It’s the way it is, especially since Araiza plays a position with an overabundance of individuals who can perform the duties of the job to an acceptable degree.

If, in contrast, Araiza were a high-end quarterback, he’d already be on a team. He probably wouldn’t have even been cut in the first place.

15 responses to “Matt Araiza, alleged victim disagree strongly on impact of prosecutor’s comments

  1. He was cut in Buffalo and he would have been cut in Buffalo if he had been a star QB or any other position. The facts are the facts and he’s not somebody that McDermott, Beane, and the Pegulas wanted around their organization, their families, and their fans. The Bills aren’t the Browns, your assumptions missed the mark on this one.

  2. The Eagles can use a great punter like him because their punter sucks. If the Eagles had a great punter like him they would have won the Super Bowl this past year.

  3. Of course she disagrees with the prosecution statement, she is watching her “pay day” go away!

  4. I would feel a little more sympathetic if she took some accountability for her role in this.

  5. This entire case confuses me. He admitted to having sex with her that night. Even told her he had Chlamydia and to get tested. This was all recorded by the police.

    Ultimately, not going to court because of reasonable doubt isn’t an exoneration. It’s just a lack of clear cut evidence of rape.

  6. This Bills fan won’t pretend to know enough to give an opinion on who did/didn’t do what. But, as they say, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

  7. I’m not sure what to believe. In December, the prosecutor said evidence doesn’t support charges and there is no path to a conviction. That statement doesn’t feel like exoneration. Now the prosecutor says Araiza left 1 hour before the assault. I don’t think the prosecutor has this story straight.

    And let’s face it, this feels like one big he said, she said. Either way, the bills were right to move on.

    I also don’t think anyone can say he was cut only cause he was a punter. The bills have a female owner and until her health issue, she was the face of ownership and actively involved.

  8. It’s better for a 100 guilty men to go free…then one innocent man to ne found guilty

    Sounds to me like he was honest about what happened…her payday is gone now..I hope the guilty are held accountable and he continues his dream in the NFL

  9. Bottom line…from the prosecutors…he wasn’t there when the assault happened. Why should there be ANY character-related doubt about the man being employed in the NFL?

  10. One big question I always have… Why is it that these young men and women don’t get the risks associated with getting hammered and going to Frat Parties where all this kind of stuff is going on?

    Any NFL hopeful athlete should stay FAR away from it.
    Any young woman who does NOT want to have sex should NOT get hammered and then hang around with drunk idiot jocks at a Frat party.

    I’m sorry, but it’s just common sense.

  11. Facts matter. The Punt God as he refers himself to be had sex with an inebriated minor at a party where she was gang raped by his teammates. Public opinion will definitely weigh in if an NFL team tries to sign him. He made a big error in judgment and he’s not criminally charged so he can get a job with whatever his college degree helps him find. The NFL is for the top 1%. Nobody is going to go out on a limb for a punter. So punt god needs to stop whining and get a real job. Maybe the San Diego DA can hire him to fetch coffee.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.