Pat McAfee says Brett Favre has withdrawn defamation case against him

Miami Dolphins v Indianapolis Colts
Getty Images

Pat McAfee opened his Thursday show with a fairly significant statement. McAfee said that Brett Favre’s defamation case against McAfee has been withdrawn.

“As many of you know, Brett Favre sued me over statements over him that I made about him on this program,” McAfee said. “As I confirmed in my court papers and I repeat here, my statements expressed in comedic style were based solely on public statements and allegations.

“As I have previously stated, I respect the hell out of Brett Favre the football player and his Hall of Fame career on the field, and I have no personal knowledge about any case involving Brett in Mississippi.

“I am pleased to report that based solely on me again clarifying these points now, with no settlement paid, Brett is withdrawing his suit against me.”

It’s a smart move for Favre. He did not have a strong case, in my opinion. He also risked aggressive efforts to prove the allegations against Favre regarding potential misuse of welfare funds. Along the way, Favre could have tripped into a perjury jackpot while testifying under oath.

And so, per McAfee, it’s over. If never should have been started.

25 responses to “Pat McAfee says Brett Favre has withdrawn defamation case against him

  1. The last thing Favre needed was to turn over more evidence during discovery for a case he had no chance of winning.

  2. It’s not defamation when it’s true. I don’t like McAffee, but glad he won.

  3. In related news, Favre is still free after stealing money allocated for one of the poorest communities in America.

  4. Seems a lot like a retraction/ apology from McAfee. Maybe he doesn’t want his dirty laundry out there either. He’s supposedly is looking to get a new deal from ESPN. This is a way to keep stuff like this out the public as not to jeopardize his new deal.

  5. Too bad. I was hoping to see that criminal Favre tell us how building a volleyball stadium at his daughter’s college with diverted welfare money was legit.

  6. He did not have a strong case, in my opinion.
    _______________

    He had no case whatsoever. What McAfee said was the absolute truth. Favre’s text messages alone conclusively show that he knew exactly where the money was coming from.

  7. Darn…the popcorn was ready and everything! Was *so* looking forward to this clown show. Ah well…

  8. “And so, per McAfee, it’s over. If never should have been started.”
    ———-
    Poor advice from a failed lawyer. If nothing else, with Favre bringing the case against McAfee, if swayed some of the public perception. If Favre had sat quietly EVERYONE would be saying he’s guilty(still a high % feels that way now but then it would’ve been worse). Any decent lawyer would’ve given Favre the same advice to bring the defamation since there’s always the option to drop it later.

  9. Captain Obvious here. Just because you’re a good football player doesn’t mean you’re a good person…

  10. Yeah, I thought the suit might be withdrawn…So would this apply to Shannon Sharpe too?

  11. Sunday Swami says:
    May 11, 2023 at 12:42 pm
    “And so, per McAfee, it’s over. If never should have been started.”
    ———-
    Poor advice from a failed lawyer. If nothing else, with Favre bringing the case against McAfee, if swayed some of the public perception. If Favre had sat quietly EVERYONE would be saying he’s guilty(still a high % feels that way now but then it would’ve been worse). Any decent lawyer would’ve given Favre the same advice to bring the defamation since there’s always the option to drop it later.
    _____________

    No public perception was swayed Favre’s way. If anything it drew attention to and perception against him from people who knew nothing about the situation prior to suit. The degenerates who support Favre were always going to regardless of whether he sued or not. No competent attorney would have advised Favre to file this case.

  12. “I have no personal knowledge about any case involving Brett in Mississippi.”

    Like everyone else here..

  13. Favre has no access to state money. Someone in a position of control of the allocation of the funds is the one who took the money and should be held accountable.

  14. kyzmyn2 says:
    May 11, 2023 at 2:51 pm
    Favre has no access to state money. Someone in a position of control of the allocation of the funds is the one who took the money and should be held accountable.
    ________________

    Favre obviously did have access to the money through his relationships with the governor and the state agency personnel. His texts clearly show that he requested the welfare funds be diverted to volleyball complex, knew that the diversion was improper, and that he was concerned that the scheme would become public.

  15. nfl1920 says:
    May 11, 2023 at 12:37 pm
    Seems a lot like a retraction/ apology from McAfee. Maybe he doesn’t want his dirty laundry out there either. He’s supposedly is looking to get a new deal from ESPN. This is a way to keep stuff like this out the public as not to jeopardize his new deal.
    —————————————————————————————-
    Maybe Florio can confirm, but I don’t think any of Mcafee’s dirty laundry could be evidence in the case, only Favre’s. The case is about Farve’s reputation, not Mcafee’s.

  16. Sunday Swami says:
    May 11, 2023 at 12:42 pm
    If nothing else, with Favre bringing the case against McAfee, if swayed some of the public perception. If Favre had sat quietly EVERYONE would be saying he’s guilty(still a high % feels that way now but then it would’ve been worse).
    _________________

    Folks need to realize that a scorched earth strategy is not the way to defend your reputation. It did not work here, did not work for Michael Irvin, and 99.99% of time does not work for anyone. Screaming about how you have been defamed and filling lawsuits for ridiculous damage amounts does nothing but draw more attention to situation. Such tactics just make someone look worse than they already do.

  17. Mcafee is a tool as a talent on air and seemingly in person too. But in this case, he was right.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.