Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch: TNF switch from broadcast to streaming is a “disaster”

The Allen & Co. Media And Technology Conference
Getty Images

For the NFL, streaming isn’t the future. It’s the present. One executive whose business model arguably could end up being stuck in the past had something to say about the 2022 shift of Thursday Night Football from one of the networks he runs to Amazon.

Via Joe Flint of the Wall Street Journal, Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch made this comment at the MoffettNathanson conference regarding the notion that Amazon’s reach for TNF is down 42 percent following the shift from Fox: “If I’m an NFL owner, that’s a disaster for me.”

Frankly, it all comes down to how an owner defines “disaster.” Amazon is paying considerably more than Fox was for TNF. That’s not a disaster. The audience is smaller than it would have been on three-letter network TV.

The NFL knew the audience would shrink with the prime-time pivot to streaming. The NFL is now trying to do what it can to boost the prime-time audience, from doubling up on the number of times a team can be asked to play on Thursday after playing on Sunday to the looming vote on the ability to flex Thursday night games late in the season.

In this regard, the NFL isn’t simply thinking about where the puck is going. It’s attempting to apply a slap shot to the projectile.

By moving one of the prime-time packages to streaming and by shifting both a late-season Saturday night game (Bills-Chargers, December 23) and a prime-time wild-card game to Peacock, the NFL isn’t waiting for the shift to streaming to take root. The NFL is sprinkling seeds and tilling soil.

Whether it’s successful isn’t the issue. The league had to do it. Faced with a choice between being on the cutting edge of the future of TV consumption or being dragged into tomorrow kicking and screaming, the NFL is opting to embrace the not-so-new world of streaming.

42 responses to “Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch: TNF switch from broadcast to streaming is a “disaster”

  1. Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered. Can’t wait for Karma to result in NFL owners wiping tears. Lol.

  2. Wouldn’t be so bad if (1) the quality of the broadcast was equal to network quality. (It jumps around and makes me dizzy) or (2) you could buy any out of mkt game on an individual basis.

  3. The shift to streaming has already taken root. Less people have cable now than in 1994. You can subscribe to multiple streaming services, still pay less than your cable bill, and watch whatever you want. Roku alone has over 600 channels.

  4. A real disaster is settling a lawsuit and paying more than $700 million to a company you knowingly defamed and lied about.

  5. gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:24 pm
    Roku alone has over 600 channels

    It has over 600 channels available. How many of those channels still require a separate subscription to view the content?

  6. Will miss an NFL playoff game this season for the first time since, I’m guessing, I was an 8 year old in 1973. NFL, look at the you-know-what-show MLB has become after making it so hard to watch your team. Keep this up and your next.

  7. gcsuk says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:34 pm
    gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:24 pm
    Roku alone has over 600 channels

    It has over 600 channels available. How many of those channels still require a separate subscription to view the content?
    ________________

    Over 350 of the channels are totally free. Those channels have practically anything that you may wish to watch, including live sports and news. For example, the NFL Network’s draft coverage was shown in its entirety free on Roku.

  8. It is in fact a disaster, and even though this article attempts to dissuade one of that, it actually makes the case.

    The only reason this was written was bc it originates from the last name of Murdoch who happens to be right, so it’s about going after Murdoch. So. whatever.

  9. naturallawandselfownership says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:17 pm
    Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered. Can’t wait for Karma to result in NFL owners wiping tears. Lol.
    _______________

    Mark Cuban made this famous prediction, including that it would happen in ten years, in 2014. He’s running out of time to be right.

  10. NFL has had the top 1 through 50 rated programs on television for 50 years, but yeah, they should be worried about keeping their product on a dying platform instead of making more money, lol.

  11. Lachlan Murdoch, born in 1971. Every day it is more and more obvious that the people who complain about streaming are old enough to remember when Jimmy Carter was president.

    This is pretty simple stuff: advertisers want a young adult audience. They pay the bills, they make the rules.

  12. Should change the Amazon TNF theme music, it needs more bass and masculinity like the Sunday and Monday night music.

    Also should replace the pregame crew except the host, she’s ok the rest are horrible.

    Al Michaels is great as usual, Herbstreit is still stuck in college mode.

  13. Wait just a minute here.
    For years the media has bashed the NFL for not going the streaming route. Now that the NFL has embraced streaming, the media has done a 180 and says that the NFL should have just stuck with broadcast media because some fans cannot afford streaming? The media will never let the NFL win in any situation, everyone can see that now. News flash for the media…the world needs ditch diggers too.

  14. Gonna be a drought…till and sow all you want….I saw one TNF game last year…because I was in the stadium.

  15. Murdoch’s are the disaster…..money grubbers dividing America by creating an audience of disgruntled individuals who tune in to hear hosts pander to their fake issues. NFL should boycott FOX as they are traitors to America!

  16. gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:58 pm
    naturallawandselfownership says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:17 pm
    Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered. Can’t wait for Karma to result in NFL owners wiping tears. Lol.
    _______________

    Mark Cuban made this famous prediction, including that it would happen in ten years, in 2014. He’s running out of time to be right.

    ___________________________________________________________

    Exactly. It’s amazing how people keep bringing up that quote without realizing just how wrong Cuban was

  17. Lachlan’s father being allowed in the US is the bigger disaster.

    Why are we giving terrorists organizations free airtime here?

  18. All the folks afraid of change can always try to catch the game on their fax machines?!

  19. Seems many people don’t have $4.99. Streaming is way cheaper than cable. Less commercials too.

  20. Who cares what happens to a network that feature Carlson Hannity two of the biggest liars…trash network!

  21. gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:24 pm
    The shift to streaming has already taken root. Less people have cable now than in 1994. You can subscribe to multiple streaming services, still pay less than your cable bill, and watch whatever you want. Roku alone has over 600 channels.

    ///////////////////

    You keep saying similar things over and over again, who are you trying to convince? Why are you so invested in streaming? If that is your thing, cool. if others aren’t interested, why do you care?

  22. the8man says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:20 pm
    I didn’t see a single TNF game last year.
    *****************************************
    So, I would guess you’re not going to impact the rating numbers, unless you decide to watch. Then, it can only be positive. You and others who don’t normally watch, aren’t going to be missed. It’s the ones that used to watch, but won’t be able to until they get the streaming platform.

  23. Millions more people utilize the ‘dying platform’ of broadcast television than currently have access to affordable internet (the newest medium for television program dissemination).

    It costs the average consumer quite a bit more money to watch streaming NFL games. People pay the internet service providers for only the content and they might receive a modem/router for free and any upgraded modem/routers for no additional costs – that could change in the future.

    I live rural. Just had high-speed/throttled fiber (400 MBs) installed and available in January of this year, after twenty years of watching the phone company roll out incremental bandwidth speed tweaks via DSL since 2002.

    Still many people who can’t afford fiber internet, can’t afford either of the two satellite tv providers, don’t live near a major city – and have 10 to 15 digital channels they can pick up.

    The NFL doesn’t want those 3rd and 4th tier information age consumers. They have written those people off, outright.

    Ten years from now, the NFL will only be available to watch directly at the stadium or via fiber streaming internet providers. The NFL wants to meter their consumers like the utility companies do.

  24. Ooooh! Lachlan Murdoch.
    The overwhelming majority of posters to this site view Lachlan as Jesus and his daddy, Rupert as God.
    That makes them Fox Disciples.

  25. The Murdochs are the only disasters here. The CEO of Fox should be a bit more concerned with the billions his company is paying out for peddling fake news, the loss of viewers and advertisers, and the coming shareholder lawsuits.

    NFL owners just made the most money ever in their new TV deals- that’s no disaster.

  26. He is 100% correct, BUT the NFL is playing chess and F0X is playing checkers; channels are dying, and the league will make more money making their product more exclusive. Bubbles burst, but more keep coming if the faucet’s running, and Bezos is paying the water bill.

  27. Since I don’t know and haven’t ever met Lachlan Murdoch, and specifically because I’m too damn lazy to research a transcript of the entire interview from which the headline “disaster” quote is culled, I will refrain from generalizations about him personally.

    I would ask this:

    1) for those who know, is Murdoch similar in temperament & disposition to other scions of wealth ? that is to say, is Lachlan Murdoch a sanctimonious holier-than-thou self-entitled prig, completely oblivious to the fact that he was born on third base but thinks HE hit a triple ?

    2) how on earth can anyone in their right mind regard ANYTHING that comes out of any Fox executive’s mouth as credible? this, of course, being the network populated by the most obscene collection of misanthrope dimwits and dooosh-bag blowhards (Exhibit A: Sean Hannity; don’t get me started on all the buffoons formerly employed by Fox, who Fox axed to forestall further financial losses & litigation…… at the very front of the line would be Bill O’Reilly & Cucker Tarlson)…. but I digress…. this is the same network currently on the hook (as mentioned elsewhere in these comments) for approx $700M in damages for intentionally defaming & deliberately libeling Dominion Voting Systems, in a feeble & misguided attempt to perpetuate the nonsense voting fraud scheme narrative….. so, ummmm, yeah, not so much with the Fox geniuses

    3) some might consider putting words in the mouth of a pro sports team owner a slippery slope, but LM doesn’t seem to have any reservations; guessing that most NFL owners are glad that LM and his family company foot (see what I did there?) the bill for a large % of their NFL-advert-revenue-funded lifestyle(s), but if Amazon wasn’t paying a premium to the NFL for the “privilege” to stream TNF, then regardless of bogus viewership stats, you’d likely hear some squealing come perty soon, fellers….

  28. I don’t have a problem with the streaming concept. It is the nickel and diming that turns into price gouging that I have a problem with. The NFL is spreading out the product to 6 networks. Am I going to be expected to pay for 6 different services with an escalating cost?

    I hardly watch baseball and basketball anymore because they have been taken to cable. I wish the NFL wouldn’t go that route. Like you say, none of you media guys care about eyeballs. It’s all about the quick buck today and screw the future. Welp, there’s the shark. I guess you can’t help trying to jump it.

  29. MTLighthouse69 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 2:30 pm
    gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 1:24 pm
    The shift to streaming has already taken root. Less people have cable now than in 1994. You can subscribe to multiple streaming services, still pay less than your cable bill, and watch whatever you want. Roku alone has over 600 channels.

    ///////////////////

    You keep saying similar things over and over again, who are you trying to convince? Why are you so invested in streaming? If that is your thing, cool. if others aren’t interested, why do you care?
    __________________

    Obviously the people who erroneously think that streaming is more expensive than cable cannot be convinced.

    It doesn’t matter if you, I, or anyone else is not interested or cares, streaming is the future. Before too long cable will not exist. And if you think that you are currently getting the NFL free while you are paying at least $150 per month for cable I can’t help you.

  30. “Ask not for whom the bell tolls, Lachlan Murdoch and Roger Goodell…. it tolls for thee….”

    Often, those whose end is near confuse destiny with demise…

  31. It was a terrible choice and has been proven as such in different iterations in all of sports. Taking the upfront money and obscuring vision of your product for the short term gains of contractual rights money decimated the NHL, has hurt the NBA and MLB in the past and will hurt the NFL. This was a bad move and will not pan out…no way in hell.

  32. It is in the best interest of the NFL to have more bidders to televise games. NFL games are one of the few things keeping the broadcast networks in business. It won’t be good for the NFL if the broadcast networks disappear.

  33. Murdoch, as said, needs to not only worry about $750 Mil pay out but also the upcoming $2.7 BILLION lawsuit filed by Smartmatic.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.