Tempe voters reconfirm prevailing mood regarding public money for sports venues

NHL: MAR 26 Blackhawks at Coyotes
Getty Images

The best way to get public money for a sports venue is to find a way to avoid a public vote on the proposal.

That basic truth was proven again in Tempe on Tuesday, when local voters rejected three proposals regarding the potential construction of a new facility for the Phoenix Coyotes. Even though Tempe mayor Corey Woods called it the “best sports deal in Arizona history,” voters weren’t willing to foot any of the bill.

And while it’s easy to attribute this one to the fact that hockey currently occupies a spot on the fringes of the mainstream sports scene at best, the same outcome would be likely in any jurisdiction for any NFL team. Most electorates contain far more voters who don’t care about football, and who wouldn’t be inclined to subsidize the oligarchs who own and operate football teams.

Even though ballot measures regarding public money for sports stadiums almost always fail, efforts to get the money via political maneuverings not involving the ballot box almost always prevail. It could be as simple as politicians not wanting to be responsible for losing the local team, and in turn being willing to do whatever needs to be done to save it.

Regardless, Tempe voters have made it clear that they don’t sweat the possibility of losing the local ice hockey team. If another city wants to attract the Coyotes, the time to act is now.

As long as it can put the money together without putting the issue out to vote.

23 responses to “Tempe voters reconfirm prevailing mood regarding public money for sports venues

  1. With the rise of flexing schedules that may move what would have been a home game, leaving fans holding the bag, NFL owners may find themselves facing more than just a few disenting voters when it comes to public funding of their “empires.” I know stadiums can be multi-activity venues, but …

  2. Kansas City Royals are running into this as they want a downtown stadium . They are doing a “listening tour”, to move away from a great stadium . Public don’t want to pay for it

  3. This article is severely misleading. The proposed arena was to be entirely privately funded. The only reason it was on the ballot was because the city of Tempe was to sell the land to the Coyotes. By the way, the land is a hazmat waste site. The only public money that was proposed was for the city to pay half of the cleanup costs. Apparently some people prefer to leave hazardous sites contaminated.

  4. If the no taxes crowd had their way we would have no police or fire departments, no roads, no ambulances, no schools, and no libraries. Public services have to be paid for.

  5. Now I’m confused. Is it the “Phoenix” Coyotes or “Arizona” Coyotes?

  6. Tempe/Phoenix people wouldn’t know a good thing if it fell of out the sky and landed on their face and wiggled.

  7. Hockey in Arizona, lol. Move them to Quebec City, where there’s a relatively new amazing arena and sold out season tickets, name them the Nordiques, and be done with it.

  8. I live in Chandler. No one cares about hockey here, which is a shame. The NHL should have already moved the team to Quebec, which has an arena and a true fan base ready to welcome back the Nordiques 2.0. Instead the NHL wants that sweet expansion fee lucre instead of admitting the obvious about a situation that isn’t working.

  9. The “final solution” is federal law that allows a State or Locality to use Eminent Domain (to find a local buyer) if a team wants to leave for another venue, if the stadium was built with public funds. That would discourage teams moving, and would also point teams toward private financing of a stadium.

  10. Next up, or soon, in the NFL will be Jacksonville. There is talk about renovating this stadium to the tune of a lot of money and they are going to seek public funding to get it. Jacksonville elected a Democrat to the mayor’s office this week which was a major upset and certainly is going to affect the Jaguars stadium plans. I know this will set off the move to London crowd but if they don’t get that stadium renovated, well, everything is up in the air.

  11. gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 7:54 pm
    If the no taxes crowd had their way we would have no police or fire departments, no roads, no ambulances, no schools, and no libraries. Public services have to be paid for.

    ———

    I don’t think any commenter on here overly exaggerates simple ideas into far fetched accusations as much as you. What part of the vast majority of the public not wanting to fund billionaire’s projects is hard to understand? What on earth does that have to do with schools, roads, or police? If you’re cool with your money going to billionaires then feel free to contact them. I’m sure they’d be more than happy to accept your money. Me, I want to fund necessities. I don’t want to (in my case) fund the Bills new stadium when I live 5 hours away. And no I’m not downstate, I’m geographically north of Buffalo.

  12. @ Gibson 45
    How many citizens benefit from this? Let the billionaires finance every penny…licking the boots of billionaires, unbelievable

  13. If the no taxes crowd had their way we would have no police or fire departments, no roads, no ambulances, no schools, and no libraries. Public services have to be paid for.

    Unfortunately these “services” are the first thing cut when things get tight to punish the voters for not imposing tax increases on themselves. They never reduce the number of administrators or personal/office assistants or any other behind the scene people whose service probably wouldn’t be missed. Instead of the public paying for a facility they need to be partnerships between owners an the community where the facility can benefit the area for more than 8 to 12 football games. Let the owners make this money tax free until they recover the cost of investment.

  14. The proposed Tempe Entertainment District was a $2.1 billion dollar project with $1.9 billion coming from private funds. Someone please explain how that was a bad deal for the citizens of Tempe.

  15. The era of publicly funded stadiums for the most part is over. If owners can afford to pay obscene amounts of money to athletes and get paid huge sums of money by moving their sports leagues to streaming, and if they can willy-nilly move games around on a whim, seemingly not caring about the fans that actually go to games, then they can afford to pay for their own damn stadiums.

    Sports is entertainment, it is not a necessity.

  16. Eh, the now former mayor of Chicago wasn’t willing to do much to stop the Bears from moving to the suburbs. She made a few nominal offers in hopes of avoiding electoral blame but lost her primary.

  17. Supporting welfare for billionaires is strictly for idiots who vote down proposals for taxes for schools and health services.

  18. getem says:
    May 17, 2023 at 9:55 pm
    gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 7:54 pm
    If the no taxes crowd had their way we would have no police or fire departments, no roads, no ambulances, no schools, and no libraries. Public services have to be paid for.

    ———

    I don’t think any commenter on here overly exaggerates simple ideas into far fetched accusations as much as you. What part of the vast majority of the public not wanting to fund billionaire’s projects is hard to understand? What on earth does that have to do with schools, roads, or police? If you’re cool with your money going to billionaires then feel free to contact them. I’m sure they’d be more than happy to accept your money. Me, I want to fund necessities. I don’t want to (in my case) fund the Bills new stadium when I live 5 hours away. And no I’m not downstate, I’m geographically north of Buffalo.
    _____________

    Name the last tax for a basic service that you supported.

  19. getem says:
    May 17, 2023 at 9:55 pm
    gibson45 says:
    May 17, 2023 at 7:54 pm
    If the no taxes crowd had their way we would have no police or fire departments, no roads, no ambulances, no schools, and no libraries. Public services have to be paid for.

    ———

    I don’t think any commenter on here overly exaggerates simple ideas into far fetched accusations as much as you. What part of the vast majority of the public not wanting to fund billionaire’s projects is hard to understand?
    __________

    $1.9 billion of $2.1 billion Tempe project was to be paid by private funds. How exactly does that constitute the public funding a billionaires project?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.