Mark Davis “absolutely not” in favor of TNF flexible scheduling

San Francisco 49ers v Las Vegas Raiders
Getty Images

Raiders owner Mark Davis is among those not in favor of additional flexible scheduling for Thursday Night Football.

Davis told Jarrett Bell of USA TODAY that he would rather just have the NFL “make the schedule and play it,” adding he’s “absolutely not” supporting additional flexing.

Davis also took a dig at one of his team’s division rivals when further explaining his position.

“If you have a Raiders-Chargers game in Las Vegas scheduled for a Thursday and all of the fans driving from Los Angeles — the Raiders fans and all three Chargers fans — buy their tickets and book their hotels, how in the hell do you schedule it and now say, ‘Sorry, it’s now on Sunday?’” Davis told Bell. “How in the hell do you do that?”

But, Bell added, Davis seemed resigned that the revised TNF flexing proposal — which would allow a game to be switched with a minimum of 28 days’ notice — will pass during the league’s spring meeting this week.

Giants co-owner John Mara famously called the initial proposal from the March league meeting, which would have allowed a game to be flexed from Sunday to Thursday with a 15-day notice, “abusive” toward fans.

8 responses to “Mark Davis “absolutely not” in favor of TNF flexible scheduling

  1. I highly doubt Mark Davis really is thinking about the fans. Just be honest Mark, you know your Raiders are going to be garbo this year and you know the Raiders are going to get “flexed” out of their only prime time Prime game of the season that nobody really wants to see (other than the Bolt fans) the Raiders get smacked around at home by the Chargers. Even in a loss, Mark knows he’s going to lose his Prime game, that’s the real reason he’s against “flexing”.

  2. warpumpkin115 says:
    May 22, 2023 at 8:06 pm
    I highly doubt Mark Davis really is thinking about the fans. Just be honest Mark, you know your Raiders are going to be garbo this year and you know the Raiders are going to get “flexed” out of their only prime time Prime game of the season that nobody really want
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Bad news fer you ,.bub, we got 6 prime timers so looks like you’ll have plenty of time to type angrily of the atrocities on the world that MD has trangressed.

    Meanwhile, back at the Legion of Doom I’ll be enjoying the sport from the comfort of an old busted couch with whatever munchies I can manage to wrangle up. With the exception of the newer facilities and maybe a couple legendary venues (like Seattle to experience the 12th Man) there’s not much to entice me to go drop the coin n deal with the hassle of a live game. I’ve gone to a couple games n it is fun. To a point lol. Now the extra concern of flex games is another notch in the “Stsy the Hell Home” column lol

  3. No fan should attend a flexed game in person or watch on television. If enough fans can’t get together and make something this simple happen the NFL will have no reason to abolish flex scheduling. Of course this wouldn’t affect the gamblers. Flex scheduling doesn’t impact them much, and it seems to me that most league decisions these days are made with gambling in mind.

  4. The Chargers are low hanging fruit. If the Chargers weren’t such a horribly run franchise (and this goes all the way back to when Gene Klein owned the team) they would have a much larger fan base. Bailing on San Diego just made matters that much worse.

    Davis is moving his team to Vegas. I seriously doubt he would be moving to Vegas if his much-traveled Raiders (playing in both Los Angeles and Oakland) had a permanent home with a stable fanbase.

  5. Davis is moving his team to Vegas. I seriously doubt he would be moving to Vegas if his much-traveled Raiders (playing in both Los Angeles and Oakland) had a permanent home with a stable fanbase.
    ==========

    Davis wanted to be in LA, due to the size of his pocket book, Kroenke won that fight

    Spanos is such a useless lowlife, the League was better off making him Kroenkes tenant

    The Raiders had enough brand appeal to get a deal done elsewhere

    .. the League shouldn’t have left San Diego. I understand, the money just wasn’t there to get a deal done, but its just a huge long term mistake.

    Too bad their bylaws prevent them from forcing freeloaders like Spanos out. Everyone would be better for it.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.