With Snyders out of the picture, Jason Wright cast the Commanders’ votes on Monday

Key Speakers At The Bloomberg Power Players Conference
Getty Images

The NFL has an obsession with ensuring that every team has one person — and only one person — who can vote on league matters at league meetings. With Daniel Snyder’s double-secret probation that either has or hasn’t ended still keeping him away, his wife Tanya isn’t present, either.

It’s not a huge surprise, since a deal has been signed for the Snyders to sell the team to Josh Harris. Still, someone needed to be able to cast votes on important issues. On issues that came down to one vote.

Like the Thursday night flexing vote. The league office got just enough “yes” votes to push it through. Twenty-four teams voted in favor of it, and eight teams opposed it. If only one of the teams that voted in favor of Thursday night flexing had voted against it, the measure would have failed.

The Commanders could have been that vote.

According to a team spokesperson, franchise president Jason Wright is representing the team at these meetings. He’s also casting the votes.

And here’s where it gets a little confusing. We’d previously been told that the Commanders were opposed to Thursday night flexing in March. We reported it, without anyone pushing back against the reporting. (That’s hardly dispositive, but plenty of teams aren’t bashful about telling us when we got something wrong.)

Now, the Commanders say they were never against it.

Regardless of whether they were against it before they were for it, there definitely were and still are people within the organization who are opposed to it. The real question is whether the Commanders voiced opposition to it in March, and whether they needed to be flipped from no to yes, in order to push the measure through.

Also, it’s one thing for Wright to cast the ballot. Who made the decision? Weight? The Snyders? Harris?

In the end, that “yes” vote helped the league tremendously at a time when the Commanders could use a little help, especially as it relates to the specific structure of the Josh Harris bid ultimately securing 24 “yes” votes of its own at some upcoming gathering of the owners. If the Commanders really were against it before they were before it, the value of the Commanders’ assistance to the league becomes very significant.

UPDATE 6:39 p.m. ET: The Commanders corrected themselves later in the day, explaining that general counsel Norm Chirite, not Wright, is casting the votes at the meetings.

16 responses to “With Snyders out of the picture, Jason Wright cast the Commanders’ votes on Monday

  1. Clearly, he needed 24 YES votes to gain ownership of the washington football team, and coincidentally there happened to be 24 teams voting for something all us fans hate. So harris knew that to get his approval, he had to give his on this issue. What a joke. Talk about a kangaroo court. “Welcome to the party, pal!”

  2. “And here’s where it gets a little confusing. We’d previously been told that the Commanders were opposed to Thursday night flexing in March. We reported it, without anyone pushing back against the reporting. (That’s hardly dispositive, but plenty of teams aren’t bashful about telling us when we got something wrong.)”
    ————
    Not confusing at all. If they denied it then there would be multiple stories about how since their protesting/opposing the story then it must be true or there would be multiple articles stating that there’s no clear consensus on what they think, which is exactly what this article then goes to state rather than just admitting they may have been wrong they instead double down and call it a fact saying people in the organization have been and are opposed.

  3. It says a lot that a group of people as unsavory as the NFL owners don’t want to be around Danny Snyder.

  4. From day one Jason Wright has done an absolute horrible job in his role with the Commanders. I hope the first thing Josh Harris does when he gets control of the team is to show Wright the door.

  5. Lets not make the Commanders the bad guy, when 23 other teams voted for it too. They are equally to blame.

  6. Considering the fact that Jason Wright was a former RB in the league not that many years ago, I can’t envision him voting for it. Therefore, I think the voting process was ‘rigged’. I say it is time for another Congressional investigation with tongue partially inserted in cheek.

  7. This explains why he’s been doing interviews all over town talking as if the new owners are going to write him in as their executive! He should be fired along with Rivera and the rest! Then I’m sure Wright will sue, claiming he was somehow wronged!

  8. Since you know Jason is terminated quickly by Washington the commish offered him a very kush NFL head office gig for his vote

  9. I cannot comprehend the conflict. I bleed burgundy & gold, but if we’re bumped Thursday night for a better Prime Time match up … it is what it is. There’s no crying in football.

  10. In the biz, we call that tit for tat. Should be fun watching the new owner F up the league with the other 23 incompetent owners.

  11. Dropping the financial standards can ultimately lead to a team going belly up. Will all the guaranteed dollars players are getting I would be a bit concerned if I was a player.

  12. When engaged in the age old art of horse trading, don’t be shocked when horses are traded.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.