Shaquille O’Neal finally gets served in FTX lawsuit

Boston Celtics v Miami Heat - Game Four
Getty Images

He was able to run, but he was not able to hide.

NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal, after eluding process servers for months, finally has received a summons and complaint in the class action filed against him and other celebrities (including Tom Brady) over the collapse of FTX.

Attorney Adam Moskowitz tells PFT that O’Neal was served on Tuesday night, during the Heat-Celtics NBA game that O’Neal was working for TNT.

Coincidentally, the arena where the game was played previously was named FTX Center, before the company imploded.

“He was personally provided the papers, so he cannot raise his absurd delay tactics,” Moskowitz said. “We watched the prior Heat/Celtics game, so knew he would be in the outside broadcasting b0oth where fans were right next door.”

We caught wind of the fact that Shaq had been served because a PFT reader who attended the game tipped us off to the fact that a kerfuffle of some sort had occurred. The reader found and photographed the front page of a copy of the summons.

O’Neal was served with the original FTX lawsuit filed by the Moskowitz firm. He also was served in a new lawsuit over the Astrals Project, an NFT/crypto offering.

“The allegations in the new crypto complaint are very serious and detail how him, his son and his business partner all founded this NFT Metaverse and he made promises every week that he would be extremely involved, so the value of the NFTs would grow greatly,” Moskowitz said. “Once the FTX fraud was revealed, he ran away and has not been heard since.”

O’Neal has 20 days to respond to both complaints.

31 responses to “Shaquille O’Neal finally gets served in FTX lawsuit

  1. Can’t wait to see how this turns out.
    This could be the end of athletes ever doing any kind of endorsements at all.
    I may go to a Subway, fake food poisoning and sue Charles Barkley, Steph Curry….Peyton Manning…Oh yeah… Tom Brady also told me to get a Subway sandwich. I’m suing every celebrity in those commercials.

  2. You had to be extraordinarily stupid to purchase an NFT. Silly lawsuit when it’s your own stupidity that got you in this situation.

  3. Did Shaq fall for the remove all the tp from the stalls trick?
    Shaq: What the! Hey, somebody hook me up with some tp!
    Moskowitz: Here you go.

  4. These attorneys must be employing the worst process servers in history. It is not difficult to figure out where Shaq is every night that TNT/TBS airs a game. Any decent process server would have this done the day that the complaint was filed.

  5. Also, have these class action attorneys not heard of certified mail? Practically every jurisdiction allows a complaint to be served via certified mail. Going after service in person in this case is simply a publicity stunt.

  6. I haven’t read the lawsuit, but if Shaq, Brady, etc. were paid endorsers of a product due to their celebrity status why are they being sued? This would be like suing an actor that got paid to do a commercial for KIA because all of their cars had a flaw that let them be stolen. That actor doesn’t know that the engineers made a bad design flaw. They were just taking money to let someone use their popularity to sell a product. If they did know that FTX was corrupt then sure, but getting paid to do commercials? C’mon man.

  7. I would think it would be a difficult task for someone as large as Shaq to hide for long.

  8. Little chance any of the people that promoted FTX will pay a dime. They were paid to do a job and they did it. They didn’t have any insider knowledge that the company was going to fold and they didn’t act in bad faith by doing what they were hired to do. I am sure they were all incented to do well if FTX did well, so they probably all lost whatever they were paid anyway.

    The Astrals Project, who knows? He could be liable if he is the founder and there was fraud. Promising he would be involved doesn’t mean much though.

  9. It’s discovery, “what did Shaq know and when did he know it” If he can successfully play the I dunno card he will be fine. What about: I misunderstood the meaning of the word “is” remember that one?

  10. AND another thing, what if he just thought it was fun to avoid getting served??? Looks like fun in the movies. He and TB12 had a bet to see who could go the longest!! This is Shaq I won’t be back

  11. Crypto is just a pyramid scheme. Those that got in early made all of the money. Everyone else lost.

  12. dublindemonszfl says:
    May 24, 2023 at 2:39 pm

    It’s discovery, “what did Shaq know and when did he know it” If he can successfully play the I dunno card he will be fine. What about: I misunderstood the meaning of the word “is” remember that one?

    ***************************************
    You have that a bit wrong, Demon. The EXACT slime-ball response from Horn-dog Bill was:
    “It Depends on what the meaning of the word is is”

  13. Shaq has actually made some very good business decisions with conservative proven business models…he’s worth well over $400m and owns 155 Five Guys locations, 40 24-Hour Fitness locations, 150 car washes, etc, so it seems out of character for him.

    What I’m much more concerned about is the fact Florio used the word “kerfuffle.”

  14. Why are people surprised that a celebrity endorser that really didn’t actually do anything wrong to ruin the business is now being gone after in court? They went after a former president over book-keeping for crying out loud and people actually cheered. This is our new country, and people are still surprised at this stuff?

  15. tingelhoff53 says:
    May 24, 2023 at 3:13 pm
    dublindemonszfl says:
    May 24, 2023 at 2:39 pm

    It’s discovery, “what did Shaq know and when did he know it” If he can successfully play the I dunno card he will be fine. What about: I misunderstood the meaning of the word “is” remember that one?

    ***************************************
    You have that a bit wrong, Demon. The EXACT slime-ball response from Horn-dog Bill was:
    “It Depends on what the meaning of the word is is”
    ____________________

    I doubt that was his exact response. Most stenographers know that depends is not capitalized in that context.

  16. Shaq would have made helluva TE but this has nothing to with football.

  17. Lol at a man that big trying to hide anywhere. He has his own zip code. Process Servers should have had no issue finding him.

  18. @gibson45
    Provided the party accepts delivery of the certified mail.
    If the summons and complaint is sent by certified mail, it must be done using “restricted delivery”, meaning the individual must show up, with identification, to accept the mail. If they do not do so, service has not been accomplished, and the other party must resort to personal service. Simply “sending it certified mail”, is not sufficient to prove service upon an individual. Now if it is a corporation, the rules are different.

  19. I can’t imagine naming celebrity product endorsers as defendants in a civil lawsuit as anything but an attention grab, as the legal basis for any claims against them is tenuous at best. Its claims like these when frivolous claims should subject the plaintiffs and their attorneys to exposure to pay the fees and costs of the wrongly named defendants.

  20. Advice for every pro athlete reading this: Don’t sign with and endorse anything from a company if even unrelated to your product they also make football helmets. You’ll be next.

  21. Also, have these class action attorneys not heard of certified mail? Practically every jurisdiction allows a complaint to be served via certified mail. Going after service in person in this case is simply a publicity stunt.

    much easier to evade certified mail.. just dont answer the door

  22. Let’s steal the name of an old British comedy and call this new sitcom “Are You Being Served?” It can be Shaq running from a stoned process server (Seth Rogen?) all over the country, styled like “The Fugitive.”

  23. drvandalia says:
    May 24, 2023 at 4:50 pm
    @gibson45
    Provided the party accepts delivery of the certified mail.
    If the summons and complaint is sent by certified mail, it must be done using “restricted delivery”, meaning the individual must show up, with identification, to accept the mail. If they do not do so, service has not been accomplished, and the other party must resort to personal service. Simply “sending it certified mail”, is not sufficient to prove service upon an individual. Now if it is a corporation, the rules are different.
    _____________

    Actually the precise rules differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. However, you are correct in that service by mail on an individual usually requires a signature. I apologize for using the incorrect term.

  24. @drvandalia – The main point still stands that the Plaintiffs could have attempted a much easier method of service. Also, Shaq undoubtedly has counsel that is well known who the Plaintiffs could have requested to accept service.

  25. purpleguy says:
    May 24, 2023 at 4:53 pm

    I can’t imagine naming celebrity product endorsers as defendants in a civil lawsuit as anything but an attention grab, as the legal basis for any claims against them is tenuous at best. Its claims like these when frivolous claims should subject the plaintiffs and their attorneys to exposure to pay the fees and costs of the wrongly named defendants.
    ——————

    They aren’t being sued as mere cue card-reading endorsers but as people who made statements implying that they would be involved in the business and/or making claims about the returns investors would get.

  26. radar773 says:
    May 24, 2023 at 2:47 pm
    Crypto is just a pyramid scheme. Those that got in early made all of the money. Everyone else lost.

    ————–

    FTX was obviously a pump and dump, but Crypto currency in general is not a bad thing.
    It solves many worldwide currency issues given all the corruption in the banking systems in many countries. Speculating on Crypto is not a tangible investment though, like buying the stock of a company that you believe in. It’s just gambling like any other currency speculation, except much more volatile.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.